Sentences with phrase «from at least understanding»

Benjamin Graham style value investing is not for everyone, but anyone who is an investor can benefit from at least understanding the system.

Not exact matches

Quite apart from the argument over OSFI - style oversight, the former federal official and others stress this segment of the market at least requires more transparency and clearer data so regulators and the Bank of Canada can better understand the credit landscape and the extent of high - risk loans issued by private lenders.

Trying to genuinely understand where the other person is coming from generally has a disarming effect on people because (at least in my experience) few take the trouble to do so.

And if not, at least make sure they understand that marketing can never truly be great if exists in a separate silo from sales.

The first step is to understand that I'm part of the problem — or at least that I'm at risk of being seen as selling an unnecessary service from just another unknown startup.

«We are trying to toe the line, at least that's my understanding from TheBlaze.

When the next debate emerges on whether Canada should accept a large investment from Asia, we will at least be able to start with a better understanding of the underlying data.

Having recently called out the federal government for failing to provide a justification for its decision to approve Shell's Jackpine mine oil sands expansion project (an approach that serves no interest other than the government's, as even industry would stand to benefit from knowing why one project is justified while another, e.g. Taseko's original Prosperity mine, is not), it was reassuring to see that at least this Joint Review Panel (JRP) shares my understanding of this obligation under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, SC 2012, c 19.

Stock options are derived from stocks so you need at least a basic understanding of how to read stock charts.

Wipe those tears from your eyes, I understand it's embarrassing to get publicly humiliated but I hope at least some good can come from this and you'll learn to keep your mouth shut once and a while and learn.

For at least a decade and a half before the appointment of Tietjen to the presidency of Concordia Seminary, some of its faculty had begun to turn away from such understandings — though without claiming that this turn meant giving up biblical inerrancy.

At least in my own experience, as I have gotten to know people different from me, it's given me an appreciation and / or understanding for what they go through, or their culture, perspective, etc..

Thank you for letting me know, it at least allows me to understand where you are coming from and maybe I will try to look into it a little more.

A certain soteriological orientation was maintained, but there was a basic shift away from the organizing motif of justification - at least as understood forensically - toward themes of regeneration and sanctification.

If it is understood in a strongly mentalistic way, as consisting exclusively in what the agent has it in mind to do, then the agent can at least try to avoid formal cooperation by excluding from his plans the evil effects of the action he is cooperating with.

But did not the Socratic manner of speech have at least one advantage, in that he himself and all others were from childhood equipped with the necessary prerequisites for understanding it?

In the US it is fairly common to either be Christian from childhood, or at least have the basic understanding of the basics of Christian thought.

It should be the work of Christian teachers in every generation, first, to understand the Scriptures, to distinguish what gives unity to the message of the Bible from what is peculiar to this or that writer, what is central from what is peripheral, what is essential from what is accidental; and then, on the basis of such understanding, to develop a doctrine of the act of God in Christ which will be intelligible, or at least not meaningless, to the contemporary mind.

I hope, nevertheless, that my comments may indicate why one person at least on this side of the Atlantic (and hence somewhat isolated from the technical expertise, vocabulary, and sometimes apparently frenetic debates of the community of process thinkers) finds in Hartshorne's work «genuine philosophic wisdom,» especially as it develops insights into the logical status and conceptual structure of a theistic understanding of the concept of God.

But Campolo at least makes the theologically responsible argument that «you can only understand the rest of the Bible when you read it from the perspective provided by Christ.»

In my experience at least Hartshorne's a priori claims, far from impoverishing experience, actually enhance it by leading to a structure of understanding which gives due weight to both the abstract and the concrete, both the necessary and the contingent, both the unchanging and the changing aspects of reality.

I get all kinds of «hate mail» for loving Muslims the way I would want to be loved which is to get an understanding of Islam from people who are at least sympathetic if not ardent supporters of the faith.

That way, even when I don't agree, I at least have a basic understanding of where people are coming from.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiat the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiAt the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees from state college (I mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).

Still not sure where any of this connects with me or the New Testament, but at least I understand more of where you're coming from.

Paragraph 2: We donâ $ ™ t agree, or at least I donâ $ ™ t agree that â $ œto be a real Christian is to believe that all other faiths are in error and profoundly so.â $ Having said that, I can also understand how a person would get that impression from the Christianity they see on TV.

sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».

Then my identity no longer derives from things or from the attitudes of others but, to some degree at least, stems from a clearer understanding of the truth of my relationship to God; and this understanding can sharply decrease the fear generated by ignorance of who I really am.

Though the particular structure and procedure of Process and Reality appear to be quite a divergence from most philosophic exposition, Whitehead here achieves a system which requires at least a moderate understanding of the mathematician's construction.

When we understand human nature as the pinnacle and goal of material development it all appears to come to nothing, or at least to frustration, without an end in God - and that quandary can not be answered from within the categories and potential of created being.

If the Trinity is not to be understood tritheistically, the generation of the Logos from the Father is God's self - expression, whereby God's nature is articulated in ways at least partially accessible to discursive reason.

Followed by a tent in the southern region... I completely understand his decision... at least from that perspective... can't have the entire audience, team, etc seeing said «tent»

At least we question whether the compiler has understood the spectrum of mankind's Scriptures from within or whether he has merely combed them for those parts which appear to be useful.

With that background in mind, they also have every right to feel a sense of insensitivity from Muslims and any other person who wouldn't at least understand them when they oppose the building of a structure that reminds them of the evil that those individuals cause on that fateful day.

As human knowledge advances, it seems, the realm of mystery, at least as it is often understood, will gradually shrink and eventually disappear from view altogether.

At least, we will be conscious of the language - game we are using and will assist our students in understanding how we point and show in religious language in a way that is different from how we do so in a chemistry laboratory.

It was my understanding that the Islam is supposed to be an abrahamic based religion, that believes, at the very least, that the Old Testament books, especially the Mosaic Law is from God, so how is that the Qu «ran is considered to be the only true word of God?

The system of checks and balances they built in the Constitution was formed not only by the recognition that good citizens may differ over the proper course of action, but also, at least in part, by the Biblical understanding of humans as fallible and prone to wrong - doing, and therefore frequently in need of some healthy opposition from their fellows.

Disagreement about theology is one thing, but I take it that from your perspective, material truth is all that you can understand (for the time being, at least), and the notion of anyone claiming to believe (or better yet experience) other truths is abhorrent to you.

In a few thousand years of recorded history, we went from dwelling in caves and mud huts and tee - pees, not understanding the natural world around us, or the broader universe, to being able to travel through space, using reason to ferret out the hidden secrets of how the world works, from physics to chemistry to biology, we worked out the tools and rules underpinning it all, mathematics, and now we can see objects that are almost impossibly small, the very tiniest building blocks of matter, (or at least we can examine them, even if you can't «see» them because you're using something other than your eyes and photons to view them) to the very farthest objects, the planets circling other, distant stars, that are in their own way, too small to see from here, like the atoms and parts of atoms themselves, detected indirectly, but indisputably THERE.

5) Natural selection This is the understanding that individuals in every generation are different from one another, or, at least some of them are.

I think the best way of understanding cosmic purpose in our loose sense is to propose that it consists essentially in the aim toward beauty.3 Perhaps from the limitedness of our own perspective we can say no more, but at least we can say this much.

There are dangers in our phrasing here which we shall clarify later on, but it is legitimate to state that at least some things which appear without intelligibility from an earlier perspective may in principle become intelligible within a later and wider perspective.8 If this is the case, then, it may be simply impossible for us ever to have a controlling and objectively comprehensive understanding of what chance really is.

At least, that's what I understand from the money in my wallet (In God We Trust).

It is precisely because of the particular shape of the Christ - event as Paul understands it — as a gift (1:6, 15) given without regard for its recipients» worth, status, honor, or cultural capital, whether Jewish or pagan (1:14 - 15; 6:15), delivering them from enslavement to cosmic powers (4:1 - 7)-- that Paul deems circumcision unnecessary and, in the Galatians» case, at least, positively forbidden (5:4).

I am a Christian but maybe I can help non-Christians understand what we may be saying at least from my one life's perspective

If you have read this far, maybe this will help you to understand where I, at least, am coming from as an atheist opposed most strongly against religion and what it does to our world.

[3] It is not that he departed from process thought, but that he seemed to confront a crisis in the world that challenged at least his previous understanding of it, a crisis that he could not easily digest without altering his trajectory of theory.

For example, if leaders are learning from the experts in the field, they will be in a better position to challenge pastors to read at least one recommended book a year that will help them better understand the dynamics of abuse.