Hundreds of metres of rock above us protect the detectors
from atmospheric particles that could mimic such a strike.
Not exact matches
They plan to examine data
from other instruments on MAVEN to see if escaping
particles map to the same regions where they see reconnected magnetic fields to confirm that reconnection is contributing to Martian
atmospheric loss and determine how significant it is.
It's a center for research on everything
from particle physics and astronomy to
atmospheric chemistry.
The reaction rate between
atmospheric hydrogen chloride (HCl) and chlorine nitrate (ClONO2) is greatly enhanced in the presence of ice
particles; HCl dissolves readily into ice, and the collisional reaction probability for ClONO2 on the surface of ice with HCl in the mole fraction range
from ∼ 0.003 to 0.010 is in the range
from ∼ 0.05 to 0.1 for temperatures near 200 K. Chlorine (Cl2) is released into the gas phase on a time scale of at most a few milliseconds, whereas nitric acid (HNO3), the other product, remains in the condensed phase.
Add other
atmospheric effects, soot and other
particles released
from fires during the dryer months, and it's very difficult for the satellite to pick up a clear signal of the surface, Lyapustin added.
The setting gave scientists the rare opportunity to look at the impact of pollution on
atmospheric processes in a largely pre-industrial environment and pinpoint the effects of the
particles apart
from other factors such as temperature and humidity.
To determine whether declining pollutants deserve credit for the recovery, the researchers used a 3D
atmospheric model to separate the effects of the chemicals
from those of weather, which can affect ozone loss through winds and temperature, and volcanic eruptions, which deplete ozone by pumping sulfate
particles into the upper atmosphere.
They occur when charged space
particles, typically
from the sun, stream along a planet's magnetic field lines and interact with
atmospheric atoms, producing not only optical light but also radio emissions.
Using publically available data about wind speed and water vapor flux
from real - world
atmospheric rivers over the Atlantic, the scientists created a computer model consisting of thousands of moving virtual air
particles and found a close match between the complex swirls — the Lagrangian coherent structures — made by the air
particles and the patterns made by the real
atmospheric rivers.
Most of this research has taken place just within the last 10 years, and it is truly multidisciplinary, ranging
from solar physics and
atmospheric chemistry to geology and meteorology — even high -
particle physicists are involved.
This field deflects the solar wind and prevents it
from picking away at the planet's
atmospheric particles.
Roughly half the mercury contamination in the United States comes
from Asia; much of it may arrive aboard
particles in
atmospheric dust clouds.
Two satellites originally designed to observe gamma rays
from space recently caught the
atmospheric flares in action, revealing that they emit far more energy than previously thought and release streams of antimatter
particles, which bear a charge opposite that of their normal counterparts.
The results
from the experiments were incorporated into a global
atmospheric model to assess the impact of ELVOC on the
particle formation and growth in the atmosphere.
This artist's concept illustrates how charged water
particles flow into the Saturnian atmosphere
from the planet's rings, causing a reduction in
atmospheric brightness.
Incoming energy, which comes primarily
from the sun, is turned into various forms of absorbed energy, depending on terrain and
atmospheric conditions such as clouds and aerosol
particles.
Solar
particles collide with
atmospheric gases in the thermosphere; creating a brilliant light show that is best seen
from late autumn to early spring on cold, clear nights above the Arctic Circle.
Contributions
from the following topics (but not exclusively) are invited: • Solar irradiance and energetic
particle impacts on the atmosphere • Upper
atmospheric dynamical variability and coupling between
atmospheric layers • Solar variations and stratosphere - troposphere coupling • Solar influence on climate variability • Solar irradiance (spectral and total irradiance) variations
Previous Mars missions detected energetic solar fields and
particles that could drive
atmospheric gases away
from Mars.
A sudden and intense increase of solar
particles eliminated the
atmospheric and hydrological protection, causing the atmosphere to thin and water to retreat
from the surface.
2) Most actual
atmospheric cloud droplets form around dust
particles including bacteria, rather than starting
from minute droplets of pure water.
A paper discussing the difficulty of getting
from nm sized nucleation mode to a size that can generate cloud
particles is: Erupe, M. E., et al. (2010), Correlation of aerosol nucleation rate with sulfuric acid and ammonia in Kent, Ohio: An
atmospheric observation, J. Geophys.
Later, the enhancement of
atmospheric aerosol
particle formation by ions generated
from cosmic rays was proposed as a physical mechanism explaining this correlation.
In principle, at least, the recent results
from the CLOUD project at CERN provide information about the role of ionizing
particles in «sensitizing»
atmospheric aerosols which might, later, give rise to cloud droplets.
A second UNEP report points out that it is much easier to cut short - lived greenhouse gases like methane, and fine
atmospheric particles like soot
from inefficient stoves.
In the article «Global
atmospheric particle formation
from CERN CLOUD measurements,» sciencemag.org, 49 authors concluded «
Atmospheric aerosol nucleation has been studied for over 20 years, but the difficulty of performing laboratory nucleation - rate measurements close to
atmospheric conditions means that global model simulations have not been directly based on experimental data.....
Another unsettling development is the effect of
atmospheric brown clouds (ABCs) consisting of soot
particles from burning coal, diesel fuel, or wood.
For
atmospheric aerosol, this shape factor is usually not strongly different
from one; its effect is usually assumed negligible compared to the effect of
particle size, which covers several orders of magnitude.