Creationism ranges
from biblical literalism to «intelligent design,» which disputes natural selection theory.
Not exact matches
In my experience the reformed traditions (baptists, presbyterian, and many independent churches; the puritans and anabaptists also came
from this branch) can tend toward legalism; the pentecostal traditions (Church of Christ, Assembly of God, vineyard, many independent churches etc.) can tend toward
biblical literalism and a bit of a herd mentality; the lutheran tradition can tend toward antinomianism, while the anglican and wesleyan traditions do the best at shooting down the middle (though I am admittedly biased).
Literalism diverts attention
from, as well as flattening out, the symbolic depth and multidimensionality of the
biblical texts.
They rigidly adhere to a belief structure (typically stemming
from a prior commitment to
biblical literalism and innerancy) that can countenance no doubt or uncertainty.
The final result was the rejection within mainstream culture of
biblical literalism with its repudiation of history, geology, and the scientific method, and an acceptance of the contributions of science, of evolution and Freudian psychology, of a «higher criticism» of the Bible, of the move
from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy and its need for high technology, and of a rearrangement of political views to accommodate social planning and reform which became known in the churches as the Social Gospel.
In either case, it results in a flight
from religious pluralism and an insistence on rigidity of belief, conformity with
biblical literalism, acceptance of often sterile dogma.
Using data
from the U.S. Congregational Life Survey, a national sample of religious congregations and members, Stroope and his team, composed of two researchers
from Hope College and Baylor University, measured the dependent variable of college completion and the independent variables of individual
biblical literalism and congregational
biblical literalism.
The threat of natural selection is largely philosophical: It calls
Biblical literalism into doubt and undermines the argument that humans are somehow distinct
from the rest of the animal kingdom.