The prohibition against marriage between close relations has reasons beyond any «moral» code, and certainly does not come
from biblical standards in which such relationships seem to be common, if not celebrated.
Since Paul is a biblical figure, one could argue that the Bible sets the standard for the nature of the church and, since that time, faithfulness requires that we do not deviate
from the biblical standard.
Not exact matches
Alice said: There are no
biblical rules as to how to deal with bloggers and the motley crew who visit here can't be held to
biblical standards since half of them look at the Bible as a few steps down
from the Sunday comics.
I've received countless emails
from women who, upon reading about the original intent of Proverbs 31 in A Year of
Biblical Womanhood, report that for the first time in their lives, they no longer feel that they are falling short of some sort of impossible
standard of womanhood.
Enns goes on to examine various passages
from Second Temple literature to show how «
biblical interpreters exhibit for us an attitude toward
biblical interpretation that operates on very different
standards from those of modern interpreters.
To answer that question, Justin argues that we have to have «a clear, consistent
biblical standard for interpreting the text, a principle we can apply to various passages that will help us to determine, fairly and consistently, how to translate them for our culture... Such a
standard would need to be able to differentiate God's eternal laws — such as those dealing with murder, theft, and adultery —
from the cultural
biblical rules Christians are no longer obligated to follow — such as those dealing with dietary restrictions and head coverings.»
We can't expect other religions to not look into their mirrors if we will not — and I repeat — if we will not (that's the
biblical standard as far as I can tell
from Matt 7).
It may be an arrangement that factors out different aspects of the school's common life to the reign of each model of excellent schooling: the research university model may reign for faculty, for example, or for faculty in certain fields (say, church history, or
biblical studies) but not in others (say, practical theology), while paideia reigns as the model for students, or only for students with a declared vocation to ordained ministry (so that other students aspiring to graduate school are free to attempt to meet
standards set by the research university model); or research university values may be celebrated in relation to the school's official «academic» program, including both classroom expectations and the selection and rewarding of faculty, while the school's extracurricular life is shaped by commitments coming
from the model provided by paideia so that, for example, common worship is made central to their common life and a high premium is placed on the school being a residential community.
Before continuing to review the discussion as it has been carried on within Protestant theological circles, we may perhaps be permitted a brief excursus into the realm of Roman Catholic
biblical scholarship, for Strauss's book produced an immediate reaction
from a Roman Catholic New Testament professor in which what has come to be, to the best of our knowledge, the
standard Roman Catholic viewpoint, was developed.
Rather than saying that Whitehead was very deficiently Christian by orthodox
standards, Morris B. Cohen and Bertrand Russell complained that he was excessively Christian, or at least too Christian to be a rational philosopher.7 Whitehead,
from a purely rational point of view, was, as Pascal and James before him, a defender of emotion and feeling, or in
Biblical terms, a defender of the heart, the raison.
Within the Prepare / Enrich model, I am able to work with couples
from a
standard approach or a
biblical or Catholic approach.