Not exact matches
Counsel for CN and McKercher are also expected to clash over the «professional litigant exception» to the
bright line rule, where consent to act adverse in interest may be inferred
from entities such as banks, governments, or large corporations.
Whereas there might (in the future) be a
bright -
line rule for the commercial, or profit - making nature of a given website (e.g. income
from advertisement, even if marginal, main economic activities, etc.), the criterion that pertains to the knowledge (of the lack of consent of the right holder) of the non-commercial user might prove much more problematic.
Adoption of an approach to regulating conflicts of interest that diverges significantly
from the Supreme Court's
bright line test and interpretation of fiduciary duties might lead to lawyers being removed as counsel by a court even though they have complied with the
rules set by law societies.
In the American law
from which both the
bright line rule and the substantial risk principle are derived, the substantial risk test is what defines when a conflict arises; the
bright line rule is relevant as a way of identifying whether or not there is a substantial risk.