Sentences with phrase «from claim experience»

Dividends are not guaranteed, but are paid if the company has good results from claim experience, investment income and expense management.
As I have experienced in the insurance industry many times, good companies accept feedback from claim experience into new product pricing, and consider the potential downside risks.

Not exact matches

I've never been a woman, so I can't speak from experience, but when I was younger the women I knew seemed to fear aging, which they claimed was worse for them.
He claims the experience helped serve his original goal — «Each loan that we would recoup was money we could lend to another family» — but it was also a clearly formative demonstration that sometimes external success means, well, tilting away from your original intentions.
If you want to convey your dedication or motivation, share an example from your past work experience; examples will go much further to making your claims believable.
This doesn't just fall foul of the technicalities of net neutrality, but of the core principle itself — generally, while operators claim they want to improve their customers» experience, they also want to use their gatekeeper role to demand a slice of the action from the big ad networks.
If employees experience systemic problems with slow reimbursements and claims denied, insurers are likely to hear about it from the HR staff.
Since Help Scout is a help desk, it would be foolish to claim that I'm approaching this without a slight brush of bias, but I promise you my stance comes from experience; specifically, seeing new founders suggest to other new founders why they think a convoluted system of Gmail filters is «okay for now.»
This is achieved with Amino's massive trove of deidentified data from patient experiences as described in the services billed and paid for in 9 billion commercial and Medicare insurance claims.
And while some marketers are quick to claim nobody uses niche search engines because they've never heard of them, I can tell you from ten years of experience they're wrong.
It claims it will lower costs 30 - 50 % from shops and dealers, offering an «Uber - like experience» where the mechanic visits you to service your car.
Rosales has never filed a claim against a worker who violated a non-disparagement clause with an online post, and in his experience, he said, those clauses don't prevent workers from exercising their rights to speak about workplace conditions.
But I can tell you from direct, first - hand experience that Mitt's integrity is just as solid and forthright as his supporters claim.
To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.
Or one might claim that, even though there are different uses of the term «experience», there is still something common to all or many of those uses and that process philosophy and theology are constructed around and from an account of an essence common to many different kinds of experience.
If, as the Scriptures and experience tell us, all men are by nature in a state of guilt and depravity from which they are wholly unable to deliver themselves and have no claim whatever on God for deliverance, it follows that if any are saved God must choose out those who shall be the objects of His grace (Boettner, Predestination, 95).
And I have sought to show, using Hartshorne as a concrete example, how a dialectical defense provides the ultimate support for one's claims about experience and its essential temporality and how that dialectic rests on claims quite remote from any direct or straightforward reading of experience, whether private or public.
At the beginning, a physical organism, whose life - principles were breath and blood, whose mental and emotional experiences were the functions of bodily organs, the ordinary man was submerged in the corporate mass of his tribe, without individual status, separate hopes, personal rights, or claim on divine care apart from the group.
(continued from 6/1/09) As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see....
Aside from his claims on his own alleged personal experience, Paul's testimony was hearsay.
We need to recognise our alienation from our sexuality and to lay bold claim to the gospel's promise of reconciliation to our embodiment, and then to explore some of the ways in which sexuality enters into our experience of Christian faith.
Genuine Christians who've converted from Islam have had their asylum claims rejected and been sent back to their country of origin where they're at risk of experiencing family rejection, beatings and even death.
Although the formulation of the question was not always precise, the everyday experience of black suffering, arising from black people's encounter with the sociopolitical structures controlled by whites, created in my consciousness a radical conflict between the claims of faith on the one hand and the reality of the world on the other.
I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar as it suggests that belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his system, as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.
He cites writings by John O'Malley as well as those by Gregory Baum, who claims the council reflects a «Blondelian shift» from «extrinsicism» toward experience and immanence.
In my experience at least Hartshorne's a priori claims, far from impoverishing experience, actually enhance it by leading to a structure of understanding which gives due weight to both the abstract and the concrete, both the necessary and the contingent, both the unchanging and the changing aspects of reality.
David Hall, a longtime acquaintance of Carson who said he watched the two work together, claims that Andrews supplied rough sketches from her experiences in Beverly Hills, and Carson wove them into a fictional narrative describing her exotic adventures with various shamans based on his own knowledge of Native American culture.
In my experience... the vast majority of Jews have no such animosity; and the claim that they have sounds as if it comes from someone who does not like Jews.
(The Jews can not be responsible without experiencing from the side of the Arabs what it means for the Jews to have settled in Palestine, but neither can they give up their own claim.
He was apparently ready to accept it if I had a first hand experience of Santorum's claim, but not from his wife.
Slaughter also maintains a respectful distance from Woolman's descriptions of his personal experience of the divine, noting dryly that such claims «can not be resolved by the biographer.»
But popular culture is filled with firsthand accounts from all sorts of people who claim that they, too, have proofs of heaven after undergoing near - death experiences.
In my experience the people who most benefit from this are people with a negative experience of Christianity who find the message of grace attractive, but claim that seeing God from a perspective of grace is «not biblical».
In part this emphasis stems from Nussbaum's repeated claim that we need literature to help us «concern ourselves with the good of other people whose lives are distant from our own,» and the experiences of the Guardians are likely to be quite «distant» from the poor, from racial and ethnic minorities, and from homosexuals.
For if the data of experience consisted only of universals, then the experiencing subject would have to infer the existence of other individual actual entities, just as Descartes claimed to infer the existence of a real man in the street from the sense - data present to his eyes.
For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.
In either case a claim for experience is being made, whether at the historical or the redactional level: that religiousness can be a social neurosis which blocks the healing of others and oneself, and that its resistance to healing arises from the splitting - off and repression in oneself and in society of what is unacceptable to consciousness (hence the role of forgiveness in the story).
It is as though empirical theologians accepted Whitehead's claim that, apart from the consolations of religion, life seems to be «a flash of occasional enjoyments lighting up a mass of pain and misery, a bagatelle of transient experience» (SMW 192).
Insisting that the gospel has a «proof peculiar to itself» did not mean that Christian thinking ignored the claims of reason, dismissing questions that arose from history or experience or logic.
First of all, he has not understood that he himself, according to Jesus, is claimed by God, an authority experienced as external to himself, and is by Him constrained to decision in the present moment — that God requires from him obedience.
Up to this point, I have spoken of theology's concern with the credibility of the Christian witness, which concern arises from the fact that Christian faith itself claims to be credible in terms of common human experience.
This coming from someone who lied and claims medical tests prove he experienced god.
Sometimes, especially when he is speaking pre-systematically and citing examples from ordinary experience, Whitehead seems to claim that causal efficacy merely discloses relations among the data of presentational immediacy and to indicate that «something is going on in nature and some things are affecting other things.»
First, he distinguishes from classical empiricism a revisionary description of experience according to which sense perception is neither the only nor even the primary mode of experience, but is rather derived from a still more elemental awareness both of ourselves and of the world around us» (PP 78).6 On Ogden's analysis, both the classical and this first type of revisionary empiricism «assume that the sole realities present in our experience, and therefore the only objects of our certain knowledge, are ourselves and the other creatures that constitute the world» (PP 79) 7 With these «two more conventional types of empiricism» he contrasts a «comprehensive» type of revisionary empiricism distinguished from them by its consideration of the possibility (and then also by its claim) that the internal awareness it asserts together with the former revisionary type is «the awareness not merely of ourselves, and of our fellow creatures, but also of the infinite whole in which we are all included as somehow one» (PP 87, 80, 85).
On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.
And for all its claim to fashionable multiculturalism («Women from the dominant culture, class, and ethnic group — especially in the United States — need to be careful not to generalize our experience as that of all women,» writes Ringe), the book is laughably parochial, designed strictly for Americans.
He and his father, Kevin, co-authored a The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven together in 2010, claiming that Alex had died, experienced numerous heavenly encounters and been resurrected.
While Derrida concerns himself primarily with writing and its liberation from logocentrism and onto - theological claims, Whitehead concerns himself with language and its role in the interpretation of experience.
Especially troubling from a Buddhist perspective is Haight's claim that «all authentic and lasting religious experiences display the character of having been given gratuitously by God.»
To experience reconciliation through the blood of Jesus Christ is quite different than giving mental accent to a particular belief.Now our society has devolved to where believers are labeled as «haters», when in fact, the hate emanates from those who claim otherwise.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z