Sentences with phrase «from contraceptive»

Josh Gerstein and Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico.com report that «Supreme Court grants temporary reprieve from contraceptive mandate.»

Another mineral that I'm interested in is Copper — an imbalance of this mineral is often closely linked with high / low zinc levels and as I switched from the contraceptive pill to the copper IUD 2 1/2 yeas ago, so it's a mineral that I feel I should be keeping a close eye on.

We also talk about protein and starch requirements during pregnancy, how to recover from contraceptive use and much more.

The body naturally moves toward balance so if hormones are out of whack, it is not from a contraceptive deficiency, but rater that the body is not producing the natural hormones optimally.

Most teenage pregnancies result from contraceptive failure.

«Twenty - one states offer exemptions from contraceptive coverage, usually for religious reasons, for insurers or employers in their policies: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan (administrative rule), Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas and West Virginia.»

«Twenty states offer exemptions from contraceptive coverage (usually for religion) for insurers or employers in their policies: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas and West Virginia.»

Not exact matches

«Oral contraceptive pills contain estrogen, which keeps your body from growing an egg and ovulating,» she says.

Particularly if you are over the age of 35, smoking cigarettes while using the NuvaRing can increase risk of heart problems from combination hormonal contraceptives, so before you decide this is the best method for you, consider your lifestyle choices and have a discussion with your doctor.

More than 100 businesses and religious organizations have sued the federal government to be exempt from the ACA's contraceptive requirements since Obamacare became law in 2010.

[300] In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby the Court ruled that «closely - held» for - profit corporations could be exempt on religious grounds under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from regulations adopted under the ACA that would have required them to pay for insurance that covered certain contraceptives.

A survey released Tuesday from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that among Catholics who have heard about the issue, 55 % support giving religious institutions that object to birth control an exemption from the federal contraceptive rule, while 39 % oppose exempting those institutions.

But when it claims that the «free» contraceptive coverage can be afforded by the insurer because «cost - savings» will result from «improvements in women's health and fewer childbirths,» the administration is admitting that the contraception is already being paid for by the employer, if its policy covers childbirth and women's health in general.

I am happy that the writer had the choices that she did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she did... for those people who wish to use contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic, did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...

contraceptives prevent people who aren't ready financially or emotionally from having kids and they prevent acne and mood swings in young peoples who's lives can be negatively affected.

The Decline of Males, his 1999 book, was particularly controversial among feminists for its argument that female contraceptives had altered the balance between the sexes in disturbing new ways (especially by taking from men any say in whether they could have children).

aside from stepping on religious rights, ask yourself: why did Obama / Siebelius choose contraceptives to be given away for free?

Children are a gift from God (my husband and I are currently expecting our first) but some women may never get to become mother's due to reproductive issues that can be helped through the use of oral contraceptives.

God said in the Bible, «Thou Shalt Not Kill» all contraceptives and abortions are in direct conflict with this teaching that comes directly from God.

Planned Parenthood distributes contraceptives with the help of funding from the federal government.

All the same, as long as health insurers allow guys to get prescriptions for Viagara and Ciallis, we should not restrict women from receiving contraceptives.

(Women who are denied coverage for free contraceptives from their Catholic employer, by the way, are not forced to behave immorally.

Obama's accommodation proposes that Church authorities who run hospitals, schools, and other facilities will be entitled to tell their employees that the health care insurance provided by the Church does not cover contraceptives, the «morning after pill,» or sterilization, but that the health insurance company that covers the Catholic institution will be free to contact the employees of that institution and inform them that they are entitled to «free» coverage of these things from the insurance company in question.

If your faith prevents you from using contraceptives, then don't, but not providing it equates to forcing your religion on someone else by preventing them their right to choose.

If you choose to use contraceptives, the company is not holding that from you.

Because these contraceptives are not used properly (e.g. some women forget to take the Pill on a daily basis), the failure rates (from Guttmacher) are 8.7 % and 17.4 % respectively.

if the government has to emforce a law to make people understand that something as simple as a male contraceptive or female version will protect them from then spread of disease then so be it.

In 2012, when the Obama administration first proposed the so - called HHS mandate, requiring employers to provide insurance coverage that included free access to contraceptive and abortive drugs, it provided an exceedingly narrow religious exemption from the rule that echoed some of the distinctions first made in these earliest incarnations of the English tradition of toleration.

The new rule outlines that religious colleges and universities will not have to «pay, arrange, or refer» contraceptives for students, according to a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services.

But apart from the moral and spiritual dangers of contraception, there are also grave physical risks to the use of most chemical contraceptives.

For - profit companies are still not exempt from the Department of Health and Human Services» (HHS) employer - provided contraceptives mandate, but that could change if Hobby Lobby successfully argues its case in federal court.

After closed - door conversations with the White House going back to November, the cardinal - in - waiting challenged the White House over an insurance mandate from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that forced religious institutions, except for houses of worship, to provide insurance plans that included coverage for contraceptives.

The health risks of the chemical contraceptives have been known for a very long time and include weight gain, migraines, depression, and even death from blood clots.

Because the birth control cases all focus on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden» on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.

There are times, however, where the lack of precautions can stem from the lack of education on the subject of se.x in general or the lack of readily available contraceptives to specific age groups or whatnot.

(For these organizations, employees would receive contraceptive coverage from insurance companies separately from the policies purchased by their employers).

So, if you aren't voting to prohibit abortion, deny contraceptives, or prevent gays from marrying because of your religious beliefs, then why are you?

You do realize that plenty of unplanned pregnancies result from responsible sex, since the contraceptives didn't work the way they were supposed to, don't you?

The administration is especially interested in the Hawaii model, in which female employees of religious institutions can purchase contraceptive coverage directly from the insurer at the same price offered to employees of all other employers.

I agree that the taxation interest probably doesn't exempt HL from the mandate but I can't reconcile the tax element with the detailed contraceptive mandate in the ACA.

Finally they transform thought: Members of the contraceptive culture think liberty from the natural consequences of their decisions is somehow owed to them.

The «gender equality» UN norm is inclusive of and inseparable from the other UN norm of «reproductive health and rights», which is itself inclusive, inter alia, of «safe abortion» and of universal access to contraceptive information and services by 2015.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in response to the Supreme Court's ruling — the law that protected Hobby Lobby from forced coverage of abortifacient contraceptives — is now opposed energetically by previously strong progressive supporters like the ACLU.

The expansion of state power is justified for its liberative effects, freeing women from the oppression of an antiquated institution (its irrelevance was reinforced by frequent citation of the questionable statistic that 98 % of Catholic women use contraceptives).

The U.N. Population Division tracks each nation's contraceptive use, finding a 61 percent global prevalence, and noting positively that artificial contraception increased in the developing world by 1 percent per year from 1995 to 2005 and remained steadily high in developed countries.

If their employees take their pay (From Hobby Lobby) and buys the contraceptive Hobby Lobby doesn't like?

If people pay for contraceptives thru their pay from Hobby Lobby, then Hobby Lobby is paying (helping) for it.

This is all based on the belief that Plan B, Ella and two intrauterine contraceptives are in fact abortifacient; therefore, it became a «religious right to exclude such contraceptives from ACA coverage» issue.

@rpratz: How is paying for contraceptive pills different from paying from statin drugs to keep cholesterol levels down?

It seems they are not trying to stop people from using contraceptives but they are refusing to pay for it.