Sentences with phrase «from death on the cross»

There wasn't a golden nugget, the «true Jesus», the «true Self», preserved from death on the cross.
The context clearly shows that the word «save» means deliverance from death on the cross.
He was not saved (from death on the cross).

Not exact matches

Albert Edwards, a strategist at the bank, noted that the term «death cross» derives from the shape on a chart «when a 50 - month moving average (currently at 1152) falls below the 200 - month average (currently 1145).
As Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency market get pressured by a bearish sentiment based on the technical pattern known as «death cross», investors are also aware of the mixed signals coming from big banks regarding the asset class — with great focus on Bitcoin and Ripple.
God the Father turned His face away from His Son when He suffered on the cross (which was the worst type of death, reserved for the worst sinners in those days), when Jesus carried the curse of all of mankinds sins (past, present and future) and wrath of God because of those sins.
This Yes is strongly underlined in the phrase from St. Paul in the Letter to the Philippians 2:8: «obedient unto death, yes, death on a cross
Let me get this straight... in a nutshell — you ask me to believe a man suffered a horrible death on a cross to save me from my sins, sin brought into the world when some lady talked a guy into biting into an apple?
They are to be agents of the forgiveness of sins which flows from Jesus Christ's death on the cross and his resurrection victory.
As we saw earlier from Philippians 2, it is this aspect of the incarnation — the death of Jesus on the cross — where Jesus most fully reveals God to us.
Bieber said: «Easter is not about a bunny, it's a reminder that my Jesus died on the cross for my sins and then rose from the dead defeating death
In doing this he redeems us from the disaster of sin and death by offering his life on the cross.
In response to the central point of Romans 3, which is that God freely justifies those who trust his faithfulness, as he vindicated the righteousness of Jesus» trust of him, even unto death on a cross, by raising him from the dead, the question that arises is: «Is God righteous to justify simply on the basis of trust in his faithfulness?
Jesus went to the cross out of love, to rescue us from sin, death, and devil, but since the Gospels (or the rest of the New Testament for that matter) don't place much emphasis on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through on the cross, maybe we shouldn't either.
From this contradiction they escaped in part by claiming that Jesus» divine nature or messiahship descended on him at his baptism and left him just before his death on the cross.
If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe in Jesus for eternal life, that person is not saved.
We should be the last people calling for the death penalty because we have a God who died on a cross to save us from death!
The way many of us view the death of Jesus on the cross is like some poorly scripted «Good Cop, Bad Cop» scene from a crime thriller movie, except now it is «Good God, Bad God.»
It is sin that makes us feel separated from God, and this is the feeling Jesus expressed on the cross, and is one reason Jesus went to the cross — to take our sin and bear it away into death so that we can see that God has not left us, has not abandoned us, and has not forsaken us, but has fully entered into our pain, our suffering, and even into our sin, so that He might show us how much He loves and cares for us.
God is love, love comes from God, and Jesus» death on the cross was the single greatest act of love this world has ever known.
Therefore God's justice has been manifested apart from the Law through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ (3:21 - 22)-- through his obedient, self - sacrificial death on the cross.
At the center is our Savior Jesus Christ crucified on a cross, the most horrific of all technological distortions, built by transforming a tree from the natural world into a tool of death.
And nowhere in Scripture can we behold the reality of Jesus» sacrificial death and the anguish of His separation from His Father more clearly and penetratingly than in His suffering on the cross because of sin.
Strangest of all from the standpoint of faith is the fact that although the word from the cross, «it is finished», has been spoken, the history of sin and death goes on.
Our sin separates us from God's love and salvation — only Jesus» death on the cross bridges that gap for us.
It is not something we do, but what Jesus does in us through His death on the cross and His resurrection from the tomb, triumphant over death.
In what way does the death of Jesus on the cross answer man's cry to be delivered from meaninglessness and despair?
8 The view of exaltation reflected here is not unlike the traditions concerning Elijah and Moses, except that this one took fully into account the death of Jesus on the cross, and hence exaltation implied resurrection from the dead.9
One crosses from death to life instantly upon believing in the one who paid for my sins on the cross.
We agree that the work Jesus did on the cross is the only work in all of heaven and earth that will save us from the death we deserve.
The death of Jesus on the cross «rescues us from sin» in that it reveals to us the scapegoating, blame - game mechanism behind most of our sin and violence.
And no miracle means more than the atoning death of Jesus on the cross — and his resurrection from the dead, by which he proved his identity as the unique Son of God.
Defending Balthasar against Scanlon, he cited the passages from the Pope's Crossing the Threshold of Hope mentioned above and referred also to his own book, Death on a Friday Afternoon, in which he had argued from several New Testament texts that although we can not be certain, we may indeed hope and pray for the salvation of all.
The shadow he sees at the altar is of Isaac carrying the wood for his own sacrifice, and this figure is transformed in an instant into Christ on the cross: one son saved, the other sacrificed in order to rise «from the stink / of death, promising to lift us with him.»
Shoehorning that, in turn, gave birth to whole new theologies, like the spinning of the fact that Jesus would have been «cursed» for having been hung on a cross into the idea that his death removed the curse of death from humanity.
So Peter with an extraordinary completeness presents us with the Christ who pre-existed in history and before history began (1:10, 11, 20), the Christ who came to this earth and who suffered and died for men on the cross (1:16 - 22; 2:24), the Christ who descended into Hades and so tasted the full bitterness of death (3:19), the Christ who rose from death (1:3, 21; 3:21), the Christ who ascended into glory (1:11; 3:22), and the Christ who will come again (1:7, 13; 4:7; 5:1, 4).
-- Isn't the Son of God, — He wasn't born of a virgin — He wasn't / Isn't perfect — He wasn't God and man in one person — He didn't die a sin atoning death on the cross — He didn't rise from the dead and ascend
Without Jesus death on the cross and rising from the dead we would have never had the forgiveness of sins nor the Christian religion.
Wasp you are right in away It did all come from the point of a spear, stuck into a man on a cross to ensure his death, this scenario set up a scene where within 3 days many folks were talking about this same dude raising from the dead healed of all wounds.
Heb 5:7 says that God saved Him from death... So that Jesus can die on the cross!
They would eat bread and drink wine in remembrance that Christ their savior died on the cross for their sins and thereby effected their deliverance from sin and death.
Jeremy — «Jesus went to the cross out of love, to rescue us from sin, death, and devil, but since the Gospels (OR THE REST OF THE NEW TESATMENT FOR THAT MATTER) don't place much emphasis on the blood of Jesus or the pain He went through on the cross, maybe we shouldn't either» (emphasis mine)
He is shown arguing that the doctrine of the Trinity keeps Jesus» death from being a case of divine child abuse, since it's God himself who dies on the cross.
Its uniqueness is sharply illustrated by the sign which it used, at first that of a cross, and then of a man dying crucified on the cross, sometimes transformed, reigning triumphant from it, sometimes shown dying an agonised death.
The Gospel is the good news that God has sent his son Jesus Christ into the world in order to reconcile Creator to creation, which will renew all things and he has done all this through Jesus» perfect sinless life, bloody atoning death on the cross and subsequent resurrection from the dead.
Evidently this does not mean that He was preserved from the agony of the passion and the death on the cross.
The Gospel is the truth that Jesus Christ, God the Son sent from the God the Father, empowered by God the Spirit, lived a sinless life, died on the cross for the atonement of sinners, and rose from the dead triumphing over satan, sin, and death in accordance with the Scriptures.
I believe the death of Jesus on the cross was also from God's grace.
Whether they fed on him by faith in their hearts with thanksgiving by eating the bread and drinking the wine with «him at meal, or whether they gratefully permitted him to wash and dry their feet before the meal in anticipation of being cleansed by his blood on the cross, the meaning of both symbols was the same: We are saved from sin and transformed into new creatures in Christ Jesus only as we freely and gladly receive from him the benefits of his passion and death on the cross for our redemption.
Although I had been raised a Christian and had understood that Jesus had died on the cross to save me from sin and death, I had never heard in quite the same way that redemption in Christ is cosmic in scope and extends to the entire creation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z