Very generally speaking, more serious accidents, injuries and treatments, and higher lost wages, coupled with higher insurance policies
from defendant drivers, equal the highest value cases.
Under cl 13, for failing to request insurance information
from the defendant driver or for failing to use all reasonable endeavours to obtain this information or to report the failure to provide that information to the police.
Not exact matches
Following our automobile accident example
from before, let's say the jury found that
driver of the company owned truck that hit the
defendant was under specific orders
from the owner of the company to «break the rules if you have to» in order to deliver the product on time.
Accident attorney Luke Ellis obtained testimony
from a number of eyewitnesses which placed the fault 100 % on the
defendant driver and discovered that the
driver was without a permanent license, having been hired by the trucking company only recently.
First, the judge rejected the
defendants» argument regarding the exclusion of hearsay statements
from the
defendant's
driver.
To overcome the lack of his sworn testimony, the
defendants attempted to introduce dash - cam footage
from the cruiser of the investigating officer who questioned the
driver at the site.
In response I recently received a packet of papers
from the
defendant's attorney basically requesting that I send the
defendant's attorney all the things I am going to bring to court as evodence, as well as my and everyone else involved's SSN and
driver license numbers (as if I know the relevant store employee's DL # and SSN, and as if I would give them my own).
The plaintiff
driver was stopped on the highway intending to turn left when she was struck
from behind by the
defendant driver, who had been going approximately 100 km / h.
Defendants in a car accident case may include the
driver of the motor vehicle who hit you, as well as his employer, or the owner of the vehicle (if different
from the
driver).
The
defendant driver swerved around 2 cars stopped behind the bus, ran onto the curb and past the cars, past the bus and ran the girl down 2 feet
from her mother.
The IIGA argued before the appellate court that the
defendant driver wasn't uninsured, and therefore the plaintiff had no actionable claim against Affirmative (and therefore no claim against IIGA)
from which he could recover damages.
However, the
defendants produced considerable evidence demonstrating that an increase in the following distance would not have prevented the crushing, for the lack of lighting on the exit ramp would have still prevented the
driver from seeing the body until it was too late to prevent the impact.
These
defendants appealed the judgment, arguing that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence
from which a reasonable jury could establish that the garbage truck
driver's conduct caused the death at hand.
If you settle with one of those
defendants, you might be shooting yourself in the foot by foreclosing on the possibility of getting additional compensation
from other
drivers involved in the crash.
If a case has not been filed within the statute of limitations and filed subsequently thereafter, the
defendant will be entitled to have the case dismissed and you lose your right to obtain compensation - at least
from the at fault
driver.
However,
defendant would later insist there was an unrestrained child in the backseat of the vehicle in which plaintiff was riding, and that the
driver and plaintiff hastened to install a car seat
from the trunk before police arrived.
Defendant agrees that, in any instance in which an insured or applicant for insurance provides
Defendant with a report
from a doctor (whose background and experience qualifies him / her, within the meaning of applicable law, to render such an opinion) indicating that the insured or applicant is able (either without qualification or limitation, or with qualifications or limitations consistent with restrictions on the individual's
driver's license) to operate a motor vehicle safely, the fact that the insured or applicant for insurance has a mental or physical condition shall not, in any way, affect
Defendant's decision to issue an insurance policy or the premium charged.
Missouri's law prohibits uninsured
drivers from collecting pain and suffering (noneconomic damages)
from a motor vehicle accident, unless the
defendant in the lawsuit operated a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs or was convicted of involuntary manslaughter or second - degree assault.