Sentences with phrase «from definition»

The following courses are excluded from the definition of full - time education for the purposes of awarding the IQC: -

United States Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits and unemployment compensation, as defined in chapter 443, are excluded from this definition of income except for purposes of establishing an amount of support.

OIPC have noted that this definition of «urban» differs from the definition used by OIPC to date, which was less specific.

It is also consistent with the Committee's General Recommendation XIV which excludes from the definition of discrimination, differential treatment which is consistent with the objectives and purposes of the Convention.

Provide technical direction for the design, development and systems integration for new equipment and projects from definition through implementation

Performs tasks of providing technical direction for the design, deployment and systems integration for client engagement from definition phase through implementation

Define, analyze, and achieve business goals while leading projects through all phases from definition through execution.

The exclusion from the definition of supply for supplies of money does not apply to Bitcoin because Bitcoin is not «money» for the purposes of

cryptocurrencies to be «legal tender,» excluding all but Canadian bank notes and coins from that definition.

Immersing in its specialization of Bitcoin from its definition and discipline, the new company aims at making communities more Bitcoin - friendly with its B2B and B2C initiatives gearing up to make lives easier and more productive this year.

Your definition of a critical illness may be very different from the definition used by the insurance company.

And then make sure to look at our YouTube channel, where we have hundreds of videos on topics from the definition of renters insurance to how much coverage you need and why!

The trustees» subsequent discovery of the unlawfulness of the transfers was treated by the judge — applying Bradstock Trustee Services Ltd v Nabarro Nathanson (a firm)[1995] 4 All ER 888 with the apparent assistance of a concession by the claimant's counsel — as the discovery that the facts which they already knew gave rise to a negligence claim and that, by virtue of LA 1980, s 14A (9), this is excluded from the definition of knowledge required for the occurrence of the starting date under LA 1980, s 14A.

The Casebook also includes court decisions from Canada: Haig v. Canada (1992)(omission of sexual orientation in the Canadian Human Rights Act is discriminatory); Egan v. Canada (1995)(whether exclusion of same - sex relationships from the definition of common law spouse violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 15 prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation); Vriend v. Alberta (1998)(college laboratory instructor dismissed because of his homosexuality); Hall v. Powers (2002)(student refused permission to attend a prom at a Catholic high school with his boyfriend); Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (2003)(whether denial of marriage licenses to same - sex couples based on the common law definition of marriage was discriminatory under the Charter; a postscript indicates that the 2005 Civil Marriage Act provided for gender - neutral definition of marriage).

However, Gove agreed last week to exclude mesothelioma compensation awards from the definition of «disposable capital» and will now place an amending statutory instrument to that effect before Parliament.

Constitutional law: Métis leader Harry Daniels launched a constitutional challenge in 1999 against the federal government's exclusion of Métis and non-status Indians from its definition of the term «Indian» as it applies to rights and obligations under the Constitution.

Response: We agree and have deleted from the definition of «health care» the term «procurement or banking of blood, sperm, organs, or any other tissue for administration to patients.»

Another commenter recommended that health information, billing information, and a consumer's credit history be exempted from the definition because this flow of information is regulated by both the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

Under the final rule, these beneficiaries no longer are exempt from the definition of «individual.»

Pharmacists» provisions of information and counseling about pharmaceuticals to their customers constitute treatment, and we exclude certain communications made in the treatment context from the definition of marketing.

Response: We address the commenters» concerns by removing the provision related to procurement and banking of human products from the definition.

We also interpret the statute as authorizing the Secretary to exclude nursing home fixed - indemnity policies, not all long - term care policies, from the definition of «health plan,» if she determines that these policies do not provide «sufficiently comprehensive coverage of a benefit» to be treated as a health plan (see section 1171 of the Act).

However, one commenter requested that «treatment records» of students who are 18 years or older attending post-secondary education institutions be excluded from the definition of «protected health information» as well to avoid confusion.

Comment: Several commenters agreed with the proposal to exclude «excepted benefits» such as disability income insurance policies, fixed indemnity critical illness policies, and per diem long - term care policies from the definition of «health plan,» but were concerned that the language of the proposed rule did not fully reflect this intent.

With regard to the request for evaluative material, Rutgers cited the exemption of «inter-agency or intra-agency advisory, consultative, or deliberative material» from the definition of government records.

In addition, we eliminate from the definition of «individual» the above exclusions for foreign military and diplomatic personnel and overseas foreign national beneficiaries.

We have also excluded certain records, those described at 20 U.S.C. 1232g (a)(4)(B)(iv), from the definition of protected health information because FERPA also provided a specific structure for the maintenance of these records.

A policy, plan, or program that is an «excepted benefit» under section 2791 (c)(1) of HIPAA can not be part of a health care component because it is expressly excluded from the definition of «health plan» for the reasons discussed above.

We note that, while coverage for on - site medical clinics is excluded from definition of «health plans,» such clinics may meet the definition of «health care provider» and persons who work in the clinic may also meet the definition of health care provider.»

Only one state permits individuals access to records about them held by health care providers, but it excludes pharmacists from the definition of provider.

The commenter also suggested that the Secretary consider: adding language to the preamble to clarify that the rules do not apply to clinics or school health care providers that only maintain records that have been excepted from the definition of protected health information, adding an exception to the definition of covered entities for those schools, and limiting paperwork requirements for these schools.

Response: Under HIPAA, workers» compensation is an excepted benefit program and is excluded from the definition of «health plan.»

As noted in the discussion of the definition of «individual,» the final regulation's definition does not exclude foreign military and diplomatic personnel, their dependents, or overseas foreign national beneficiaries from the definition of individual.

First, the final rule defines the term marketing, and excepts certain communications from the definition.

We remove from the definition of «individual» the provisions regarding legal representatives.

It was argued that despite the statements in the narrative, there are no provisions that would exempt any of the «excepted benefits» from the definition of «health care.»

Comment: A few commenters supported the exclusion of «education records» from the definition of «protected health information.»

We delete the term «providing» from the definition to delineate more clearly the relationship between «treatment,» as the term is defined in § 164.501, and «health care.»

Rutgers redacted financial information submitted by First Transit pursuant to the exemption of «proprietary, commercial or financial information obtained from any source» from the definition of government records subject to disclosure.

The rule deletes activities related to the improvement of methods of paying or coverage policies from this definition and instead includes them in the definition of health care operations.

While the exclusion of overseas foreign national beneficiaries has been deleted from the definition of «individual,» we have revised § 164.500 to indicate that the rule does not apply to the Department of Defense or other federal agencies or non-governmental organizations acting on its behalf when providing health care to overseas foreign national beneficiaries.

Because these types of policies in some instances pay benefits that could be construed as payments for medical care, we are concerned by the fact that they are not explicitly excluded from the definition of «health plan» or the requirements of the proposed rule.»

Because we have excluded education records and records described at 20 U.S.C. 1232g (a)(4)(B)(iv) held by educational agencies and institutions subject to FERPA from the definition of protected health information, only non-FERPA schools would be subject to the administrative requirements.

We did not intend to exclude the prosecutorial function from the definition of «law enforcement official,» and accordingly we modify the definition of law enforcement official to reflect their involvement in prosecuting cases.

Whilst assets which are acquired by way of gift or inheritance from a third party during the marriage are generally excluded from the definition of matrimonial property, if there is a change in nature of the asset during the course of the marriage, the asset could be converted into matrimonial property.

Accordingly, in the final rule we have excepted from the definition of «health plan» a government funded program which does not have as its principal purpose the provision of, or payment for, the cost of health care or which has as its principal purpose the provision, either directly or by grant, of health care.

Therefore, rather than create a blanket rule that includes such terms in or excludes such terms from the definition of «health care,» we define health care based on the underlying activities that constitute health care.

The NPRM likewise would have exempted overseas foreign national beneficiaries from the proposed rule's requirements by excluding them from the definition of «individual.»

Therefore, it was suggested that the words «provision of access to» be deleted from the definition and that a «disclosure» be clarified to include the conveyance of protected health information to a third party.

However, as described above, we add explicit language which excludes certain «excepted benefits» from the definition of «health plan» in an effort to clarify which plans are not health plans for the purposes of this rule.