«The Oklahoma City case study suggests,» wrote Jellison, «that integration plans, with a great deal of effort, can work more effectively and that courts, rather than releasing districts
from desegregation plans after only several years of operation, should ensure that everything possible is being done to promote an integration plan's success.»
An emphasis on academic performance may take away time and attention
from desegregation plan making.
Not exact matches
The sweeping anti-busing legislation — approved by the Senate as part of a bill providing funds for the Justice Department this year — not only forbids the Justice Department
from bringing
desegregation suits that could result in busing and limits the power of federal courts to order busing for such purposes, but allows Justice Department officials to support the removal of court - ordered busing
plans already in operation.
After 1974, however, school integration efforts outside the South were stymied by the Supreme Court's 5 - 4 decision in Milliken v. Bradley, which prohibited heavily minority urban systems
from including nearby suburbs in
desegregation plans.
About the Report This report examines a decade of resegregation
from the time of the Supreme Court's 1991 Dowell decision, which allowed school districts to declare themselves unitary, end their
desegregation plans, and to return to neighborhood school
plans that produce intense segregation and inequality clearly visible in educational opportunities and outcomes.
Ruling in the Oklahoma City school
desegregation case, a divided U.S. Supreme Court holds that districts that were once racially segregated by law may be freed
from court - ordered
desegregation plans if they have done their best to eradicate the vestiges of their discriminatory systems and have met court orders.
[15] This minimum percentage is reduced
from 35 percent to 25 percent for schools participating in certain
desegregation plans.