Sentences with phrase «from differing points»

All of there people appeared to be from differing points in time, my party instantly swelled by them joining me in battle.

She considers ideas raised in the readings thoughtfully and nudges her classmates to consider their preconceptions from differing points of view,» says Pamela Mason, director of L&L.

Not exact matches

Waffle House said in a statement on Monday that, while the company is still «obtaining and reviewing information,» «the information we have received at this point differs significantly from what has reportedly been attributed to Ms. Clemons.»

In fact, they trust that you want them to — because you and the company benefit from an honest exchange of differing opinions and points of view.

«However, using the rules as reference points and discussing why our policy may differ from these policy descriptions could go some way in helping to explain our own policy reaction function to the public.»

If you start screaming at the screen because their views differ from your own, you've missed the point of the exercise.

An engagement by hedge funds reveals that their views about this particular point differ from that of the incumbent management.

This means that, in 19 out of 20 cases, survey results will differ by no more than 2.5 percentage points from what would have been obtained by the opinions of all target group members in the U.S.

These pain points differ from those of a seasoned tax preparer, whose pain points may be not knowing how to maximize the amount of their return and find creative loopholes for deductions.

Airline loyalty programs like AAdvantage differ from bank - established points programs (like Chase Ultimate Rewards or American Express Membership Rewards) because you don't need an affiliated credit card to start earning miles right away.

Second, while the physical actions of taking a cold shower barely differ from taking a warm shower, emotionally and mentally it's totally different, which is the point.

I differ also from the various middle positions, which hold that there are some good things in this culture (like greater freedom for the individual), but that these come at the expense of certain dangers (like a weakening of the sense of citizenship), so that one's best policy is to find the ideal point of trade - off between advantages and costs.

Whitehead tends to ignore the point that, outside of mathematics, a whole may exceed or differ from the sum of its parts, and that adequate comprehension of it does not require reference to these parts.

The main point, however, is not that North American topics will necessarily differ from Latin American ones.

Proponents of the movement to excommunicate Kerry point out that abortion differs from such issues as just war and capitol punishment in that Catholic teaching on the issue is unequivocal.

In particular, we may note that there are three points at which the Kingdom teaching of the synoptic tradition tends to differ both from Judaism and from the early Church as represented by the remainder of the New Testament: in the use of the expression Kingdom of God for (1) the final act of God in visiting and redeeming his people and (2) as a comprehensive term for the blessings of salvation, i.e. things secured by that act of God, and (3) in speaking of the Kingdom as «coming».

On a fourth point I beg to differ from Bishop Lilje: The Catholic is not compelled by his faith to regard the Church and her magisterium as the first and fundamental factor of his Christian faith.

Although all three definitions are fundamentally similar in that in each one evil consists in the loss of the past, the particular expression of the nature of evil that is found in each (due to the equation between the nature of evil and one of its manifestations) suggests that Whitehead has elaborated each of those definitions from the standpoint of differing preoccupations or points of view.

At two points, however, my proposal differs from that of Boers.

It is, however, basically compatible with a Whiteheadian world view, in my judgment, provided that one accepts a key point on which I differ, if not from Whitehead, at least from some Whiteheadians.

«1 His point is illustrated if we consider the differing salience of the basic elements of time from three different mental frameworks.

More to the point, the current government is using the Charter, not to reveal its own limits so as to work within them, but to limit citizens» freedom to differ from the government's debatable policy positions.

by Alburey Castell [New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1949], p. 106 f.) Despite these resemblances, the ethics of pragmatism differs from that of Buber's dialogical philosophy in two central points.

And on this point Leibniz did not differ from Spinoza.

My only real point is that «inspired» seems to be too vague of a word and is full of theological baggage which differs from person to person.

The wordless counting involves two capacities, the first being «seeing numbers» or choosing the object with a certain number of points on it from among a group of objects with points differing in number, size, color and arrangement.

And, if Whitehead is right, then he differs fundamentally» from Bergson on this crucial point.

One of the points at which Lakatos differs most markedly from Popper, and most resembles Kuhn, is his defense of commitment to a «research programme».

The reports in Matthew and Mark (variants of the same) differ in some points from Luke's, and John does not report the hearing.20 At best we are at a disadvantage in having no more than a very brief précis, in Greek, of proceedings conducted in Hebrew, which may have been quite lengthy.

Messengers who observed a battle from different vantage points could differ greatly on how the battle was won, and still all be correct in reporting that the country has been saved by a great victory.

Bonhoeffer, however, differs from Barth when the issue of the religious a priori becomes more pointed.

My point is that a close reading suggests a multiplicity of ideas and beliefs that we are priviliged to witness while it's under construction, the Jerusalem controversy being one good example.Furthermore, the fact that we're able to understand that each of the synoptics significantly differ from each other and we can observe contrast and similiarity between them and John's gospel, as well as Paul's letters suggests a process that speaks loudly of how religious narrative develops in communities that seek the meaning of the «core events».

He differs from Whitehead on a major point: «I do not agree with Samuel Butler, Whitehead, or Teilhard de Chardin that it follows from the mental character of the macroscopic world that the single atomies must have mental character or potentiality.

If there is one area in which the children as a group do seem to differ somewhat, in emotional reactions, from the children that I meet in wealthier communities — and even here I would be very cautious not to overstate this — it is in their sensitivity to other children's moments of anxiety and their acute awareness of emotional fragility and of the tipping point between exhilaration and depression.

Hartshorne's main point here, presumably, is that non-literal concepts like «love» or «knowledge» differ from literal concepts in being matters of degree rather than of all or none.

We have to put the New Testament faith into a context that differs from the New Testament context at two points: the expectation of a, indefinitely prolonged future and our better knowledge of the population of the whole world.

Good point and I agree (Especially with the ass part... lol) But my qualifier of «rabid» is my attempt to point out where they differ from basic fundamentalists.

This sense of the divineness of the natural order is the major premise of all the parables, and it is the point where Jesus differs most profoundly from the outlook of the Jewish apocalyptists, with whose ideas He had on some sides much sympathy.

We must attribute them to Him only in a terminative sense, as differing aspects, from the finite point of view, of his unique essence.

I am truly sorry that you don't have the capacity to engage in intellectual debate and discussion without - hating someone that may have differing view points from you.

These observations have already set forth certain fundamental aspects of Jesus» conception of God, and points at which his view of God differs from the Jewish, in spite of all they have in common.

The point of entry may differ from situation to situation.

At least in part to deal with such points, Eigen more recently pointed out that each biological genome is not a single sequence of bases on DNA (a unique «point in sequence space») but rather a fairly large number of variant sequences that have quite similar — even indistinguishable — biological functions.11 b, 11 c Most of these functionally similar sequences differ from the «wild - type» sequence in only one or a few locations, but some have fairly large discrepancies.

In what follows I will not attempt to answer his arguments in detail, still less to score points against him; the matters we are concerned with are too difficult and too crucial to admit of such treatment; I shall therefore merely try to indicate where and why I still venture to differ from him.

At the end of a gripping account, he places the Believer before a point of cardinal importance: the continuity of a Revelation emanating from the same God, with modes of expression that differ in the course of time.

Less obvious is the second assumptio4l, that the development of the individual from child to adult also points to a sequence of implicit ontologies, which differ quite basically from one another.

At what point do the theological affirmations of process theology decisively differ from the common - sense beliefs of traditional Western culture and society?

And to add to the confusion, Wills claims to admire two Catholics above all others: St. Augustine and Cardinal Newman, even though Wills» own pontifications on sex differ entirely from Augustine's views, and his lucubrations on development bear no resemblance to Newman's own painstaking historical analysis, which would point out to Wills that false doctrines can not be said to «develop.»

Dr. Hurtubise shows that Lewis Ford's genetic approach to Whitehead's metaphysics rests on some key points differing from the traditional interpretations.

This «archeological» task rests on a reinterpretation of key passages that in turn fosters a reconstruction of Whitehead's metaphysics that differs significantly, at least on some key points, from the traditional interpretations.