It was the means by which the church was separating
itself from egregious error.
Not exact matches
Similar sentiments came
from Malcolm Hughes of the Laboratory of Tree - Ring Research at the University of Arizona, whose work is also discussed: «The Soon et al. paper is so fundamentally misconceived and contains so many
egregious errors that it would take weeks to list and explain them all.»
Not just understand it well enough to say lots of nifty words about it — well enough to start
from the basic empirical laws and principles and derive and demonstrate nearly the whole thing through the introductory classical level at the blackboard, without notes, as I do several times a year in front of several hundred very bright students a year, working with a team of Ph.D. physicists who are my co-instructors (with perhaps a century of teaching experience between us who, one would think, would correct my
errors if I made any
egregious ones along the way).
Limbaugh's transcript does not completely mirror the actual words in the article, although the most
egregious divergence
from the truth may be, could be, probably is some kind of
error in transcription.
There are various
errors of judgement, in my humble opinion, ranging
from the niggling to the
egregious, missing opportunities to inform, promote, reassure and direct interest both inside and outside the firm.
From that perspective, the real scandal is that this wasn't a data breach or some
egregious isolated
error on Facebook's part.
As was previously reported, Coinbase — one of the most popular digital currency exchanges — experienced one of the more
egregious errors in recent cryptocurrency history by duplicating users» past debit / credit card and bank purchases, effectively siphoning money
from accounts without authorization.
Further, in describing flaws in the data the EEOC's expert Kevin Murphy relied upon to support the disparate impact claim, the Judge labeled these reports as 1) «laughable»; 2) «based on unreliable data»; 3) «rife with analytical
error»; 4) containing «a plethora of
errors and analytical fallacies,» and a «mind - boggling number of
errors»; 5) «completely unreliable»; 6) «so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived
from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded»; 7) «distorted»; 8) «both over and under inclusive»; 9) «cherry - picked»; 10) «worthless»; and 11) «an
egregious example of scientific dishonesty.»