The Court of Appeals was moved by IIC's repeated failure to protect its rights by not posting a bond — but the New York Convention does not require the posting of a bond or automatically stay a secondary jurisdiction
from enforcing an award upon such a posting.
Not exact matches
A month later the Japanese firm won an order
from the London Commercial Court to
enforce the
award in Britain, where the Tata group's interests include Tata Motors and Tata Steel.
A month later the Japanese firm won an order
from the London Commercial Court to
enforce the
award in Britain.
Dr. Natividad N. Relucio Clavano is hereby
awarded the Order of the Golden Heart in the field of Pediatrics, where she pioneered in Young Child Feeding with her work in the «Under - Five Clinic National Program,» and in Infant Feeding with her work on the «Baby - Friendly Hospital Initiative» (subsequently replicated in 192 countries) which made her famous all over the world, where she banned infant formula milk
from the Maternity Ward of Baguio General Hospital and
enforced a regime of «rooming - in» of the infant.
If any arbitration or other proceeding is brought to
enforce or interpret this Agreement or matters relating to it, the substantially prevailing party, as determined by the arbitrator's
award, will be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys» fees and other costs and expenses incurred in such arbitration or proceeding
from the other party, in addition to any other relief to which such prevailing party is entitled; provided that in no event will the arbitrator have the authority to
award punitive damages.
Things have gone
from bad to worse in Venezuela, as ConocoPhillips moves to seize some of the Caribbean assets of Venezuela's state - run PDVSA to
enforce a $ 2 billion arbitration
award.
In the few cases where courts have refused to
enforce awards pursuant to article V (1)(d), the manner in which the tribunal was constituted materially deviated
from the parties» agreement.
For instance, the Hong Kong Supreme Court
enforced an
award rendered in China, even though its members were selected
from a different list of arbitrators than provided in the parties» agreement.880
In keeping with the pro-enforcement bias of the New York Convention, article V (1)(c) provides «that part of the
award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be recognized and
enforced», provided that matters properly within the scope of the arbitration agreement «can be separated
from those not so submitted.»
Courts have also applied article V (1)(c) in the context of multiparty arbitrations to exclude
from enforcement portions of an
award which address a party not bound by the arbitration agreement, but
enforce the
award with respect to the remaining parties.
As one United States court observed, «[u] nder the New York Convention, we examine whether the
award exceeds the scope of the [arbitration agreement], not whether the
award exceeds the scope of the parties» pleadings».803 This interpretation of article V (1)(c) which distinguishes the parties» pleadings or prayers for relief
from the «submission to arbitration» referred to in article V (1)(c), is consistent with a narrow interpretation of the grounds for refusal to recognize or
enforce an
award.
Another approach to avoid this concern might be to regard immunity as inapplicable to a proceeding which relates directly to another, non-immune underlying proceeding only where it is a necessary or readily foreseeable corollary of that underlying proceeding — as is the case with proceedings to
enforce a foreign arbitral
award, but not, presumably, with a defamation action arising
from statements made in an earlier proceeding.
He reached the conclusion
from combined reading of sections 2 (c), 2 (k) and section 3 of the Act that the intention of the legislature was that the scope of the Act would be limited to within the territory of Bangladesh, except for the scope to
enforce of an
award passed in a foreign arbitration, pursuant to the section 3 (2) read with section 45, 46 and 47 of the said Act.
Therefore, the homologation process in Ecuador implies that the party that seeks the enforcement of a foreign
award shall file a petition with the Provincial Court8, which will assess whether the
award complies with the following requirements: (i) The international
award complies with the formalities required for it to be considered authentic in the state where it was issued; (ii) The
award is final and binding in the jurisdiction where it was delivered and the attachments are duly legalized; (iii) With regard to the requirement prescribed in the Convention, if the
award is in a language other than the official language of the country, in this case Spanish, it shall incorporate a translation; (iv) It is shown
from the legal papers of the arbitration proceedings that the party against whom the
awards is being
enforced was duly notified of the claim and that there was no due process violation; (v) The petition must specify the domicile of the party against whom the
award is being
enforced.
The Claimants made a number of points in relation to service: first, they said that the Riyadh Convention was permissive in providing for service or notification by the means set out, not mandatory; secondly, they said that if it was mandatory it did not set out the documents which had to be served or notified in the prescribed manner, which was a matter for the DIFC Court; thirdly, and as an overriding point, if the KRG was not immune
from suit, there had to be some way to
enforce the
Awards and the KRG could not be allowed to stymie service or notification under the Riyadh Convention by effectively claiming sovereign immunity unjustifiably.
In finding that the family court erred in modifying the equitable distribution
award, rather than
enforcing it against Son and the LCC, the Court of Appeals distinguished this case
from Richardson v. Richardson, 309 S.C. 31, 419 S.E. 2d 806 (Ct..
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its endorsement in Alfred Wegener Institute v. ALCI Aviation Ltd., 2014 ONCA 398, upholding an order
from the application judge that a German arbitral
award be recognized and
enforced in Ontario as if it were a judgment or order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
Arbitration
awards can be
enforced in Small Claims Court, says a recent ruling
from the Divisional Court.
Kettani notes that aside
from introducing these major reforms, the Moroccan government also schedules regular training and seminars for judges to encourage them to support arbitration proceedings and to
enforce awards accordingly.
Here, the court found that while the plaintiff probably wasn't a «non-producing troll» (someone who
enforces copyrights just to extort money
from people who are too embarrassed to fight a Federal porn suit), the court still found that a damage
award that was three times the statutory floor was excessive.
(In Jones v Jones (1889) LR 22 QBD, an English court refused to
award multiple damages, and the Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980 prevents an English court
from enforcing a judgment for multiple damages.
We successfully obtained leave
from the High Court to
enforce two Ukrainian arbitration
awards.
The Act lists a variety of proceedings in respect of which there is no limitation period (section 16): proceedings for declarations; proceedings to
enforce court orders and other orders that are enforceable in the same way as court orders; proceedings under the Family Law Act relating to support; proceedings to
enforce arbitration
awards; proceedings by persons in possession of collateral to redeem or realize on it; proceedings arising
from sexual assault in certain circumstances; proceedings to recover fines, taxes and penalties owing to the Crown; proceedings relating to claims by the Crown (or by a delivery agent under social welfare legislation) in various circumstances; proceedings to recover money owing in respect of certain student loans,
awards and grants.
Dispute as to whether previous
award of damages for breach of a «keep open» clause in a commercial lease precluded the landlords
from enforcing the repairing obligation and having the vacant premises put into a condition whereby they could immediately be traded
from.
● Were national courts precluded
from deciding an issue due to an ASI, there would be a risk that those courts might later refuse to recognise and
enforce any future arbitral
award.
For example, the New York Convention allows member states to declare that they will
enforce foreign arbitral
awards only
from countries that will
enforce those made in the declaring state: in short, a reciprocity clause.
(D) The establishment of a Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice for the Institute, Society or Council which are not inconsistent with the Code of Ethics of the National Association as
from time to time amended; provided, however, that in order for its members to be eligible for Institute Affiliate Membership pursuant to Article III, such Institute, Society or Council must adopt and
enforce the National Association's Code of Ethics or a code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been
awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold office;