Sentences with phrase «from false premises»

So began a fundraising pitch from Inside Climate News, a investigative journalism outfit starting from false premises to reach false conclusions.

Not only that, it would start from the false premise that there is no pre-existing regulatory relationship between us.

«It starts from a false premise that the discussion is developing versus developed, which is just another way of saying rich versus poor.

Up until today, the average American gets 60 — 70 % of his or her protein from animal sources, mostly without realizing that this practice largely arose from the false premise that animal protein improves physical fitness and sport competitiveness.

Apart from the false premise that your body will «expect» a workout when your brain knows it isn't going to happen, is the presupposition that your body never figures out this is a repeating cycle with the Sunday workout always missing.

«The government starts from the false premise that an ebooks «market» was characterized by «robust price competition» prior to Apple's entry.

You're operating from a false premise: when that post speaks of «investing» they refer to the stock market.

So you can not argue that I am starting from a false premise.

Given the above, there is little hope that the traditional climate models correctly interpret climate change and nothing concerning the real climate can be inferred from them because from a false premise everything can be concluded.

Not exact matches

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

No, the premise that creationism is false (which is proven) is different from the notion that God does not exist or is «bad» for children.

* Aside from being a false premise, just because someone chooses not to terminate a pregnancy does not mean that they are not «pro-choice.»

DVD Review by Kam Williams Headline: Samuel L. Jackson Dud as Racist Neighbor Due on DVD This cinematic fiasco rings false from beginning to end, from its patently absurd premise clear through to its unintentionally funny resolution.

However, if they arrive and it turns out to be a false alarm the premises will receive a letter from the FRS requiring the premises be registered to the policy.

Indeed, educational premises are known to suffer from false alarms; in 2006 London Fire Brigade reported they received approximately ten false alarms per day from educational premises.

According to the NPCC, a false alarm would be one that has not resulted from: a criminal attack, or attempts at such, on the protected premises; actions by the emergency services in the execution of their duty; or a call emanating from a hold up alarm with good intent.

Your otherwise thoughtful letter to Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan is marred by the false premise from which it starts.

Which brings us to the second false premise — that you can, or should, start from scratch.

All of these pet sale bans are based upon the false premise that pet stores source from unethical breeders.

It's not surprising that laws based on a false premise are doomed to fail from the start.

Likewise, if the results of one's test result in confirmation, it may very well be the case that the prediction itself was derived from premises in the theory which are in fact false, but that premises in one of the background theories were also false, and that one logically derived a true prediction from two false premises.

No you didn't, but you did state that selecting an average ECS for a basis of decision making is «fools gold from an engineering standpoint» which may well be true, but the premise is false — we do not use an average, we use a probabilistic range.

If an issue based on sound science conclusions has irrefutable merit, it would not have the fatal appearance of being based on a false premise from its inception, a foregone conclusion of it as a settled science in need of action to solve it and adapt to it.

The allegations are based on the false premise that ExxonMobil reached definitive conclusions about anthropogenic climate change before the world's experts and before the science itself had matured, and then withheld it from the broader scientific community.

Also, your premise has the problem as antecedent to a patently false claim, as the substantial argument on my side against the validity of your argument is not even separated from your claim of its nonexistence by two inches on the page.

If so then I will start by noting that the climate appears to be a far - from - equilibrium system, hence Andy's basic premise is false.

How, exactly, is this not circular reasoning on the one hand, and circular reasoning from an obviously false premise on the other?

Now we have to differentiate between those who believe strongly in the premise from those who believe strongly that the premise is false.

It is up to those who posit potentially catastrophic warming from AGW (= CAGW), as IPCC does, to demonstrate that this premise is correct — NOT up to those who are rationally skeptical of this premise to demonstrate that it is false.

Their paper is accompanied by a short, fierce response in the same journal from Mark Jacobson of Stanford, cited in the first study, who argues that the premise of Clack and his colleagues is «demonstrably false.»

We are also one of the few law firms working to protect the financial interests of self - insured retailers from schemes related to premises liability, including false personal injury claims.

Aside from asserting the negation as fact, how is the false premise embedded in the accusation best disputed?