He had indicated a willingness to grant states a one - year waiver
from federal testing requirements if each student took both the English language arts and math tests.
What they need, at minimum, is a one - year waiver
from federal testing requirements so that instead of wasting this school year administering the same old damaging and worthless high - stakes tests, they start planning for the future.
Not exact matches
Some key reforms live on, including the
federal requirement that states
test their students in reading and math
from grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, disaggregate the results, and report the information to the public; and the
requirement that states intervene in the bottom five percent of their schools.
Influential education advocates have denounced the House and Senate proposals to reform the
testing and accountability
requirements of No Child Left Behind as a «retreat»
from the expanded, post-NCLB
federal role.
Aside
from explaining the legislation to others, Wood and his colleagues were charged with bridging the gap between Tennessee's current standards - based
testing requirements and those of the
federal government.
◦ Trend: Nearly four out of five respondents favor the
federal requirement that all students be
tested in math and reading in each grade
from third through eighth and at least once in high school, about the same as in the past.
When people are asked whether the
federal government should continue the
requirement that all students be
tested in math and reading in each grade
from 3rd through 8th and at least once in high school, nearly four out of five respondents say they favor the policy (see Figure 2).
Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Senate HELP committee, put forth a bill that leaves open the possibility of removing the
federal requirement that states
test students annually in reading and math
from grades three through eight — a possibility that has thoroughly freaked out much of the education - reform community.
In the first five years of the
federal No Child Left Behind Act, much attention has been focused on implementation issues —
from how to manage the increasing number of schools and districts «in need of improvement» or in «corrective action,» to problems with
testing programs, adequate - yearly - progress reporting, and the law's highly - qualified - teacher
requirements.
[REF] Because Arizona's law is a departure
from the
federal requirement of one uniform state
test, Washington's reaction to the legislation may be an indicator of the
federal government's interpretation of flexibility under ESSA.
DPI also is required to ask the U.S. Department of Education for a waiver
from federal requirements that mandate one
test be given to all students, in order to provide schools with options of
tests.
Garcia has pushed back against the
federal requirement that schools
test students every year in math and reading
from grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, calling it «toxic
testing» that has turned schools into
test - prep factories.
But the Obama administration made
test - based evaluations a
requirement for any state that wanted to compete for Race to the Top grant money or win relief
from the
federal No Child Left Behind law.
However, having multiple
tests could jeopardize the state's waiver
from requirements under the
federal No Child Left Behind law and
federal funding.
Re: the US News article on top about ESSA: Chairwoman Foxx is right about the role of the
federal government in America's K - 12 education system; and families can continue to pressure educrats like Mr Botel by opting out, wherever and whenever possible,
from their local state schools until the
federal government gives up on the continuing mistake of its annual
testing requirement in two subjects only, which has produced no significant improvement in American education for 15 years now, but has cost us in lost opportunities, including time and energy that might have been devoted to non-tested subjects, including those in the broader curricula represented by the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, which requires assessment — including but not limited to external final exams — in six subjects distributed over at least five fields, an assessment approach that has been imitated by the world's leading educational jurisdictions, but is being discouraged by the ignorant Luddites in the the U.S. ED.
Although ESSA nullified waivers requiring that states implement
test - based teacher evaluation systems, the proposed rules still contain provisions related to the student growth component of T - TESS emanating
from the former
federal waiver
requirements, which TCTA finds troublesome.
Huberty urged Morath to reach out the U.S. Department of Education to find out whether a waiver
from testing could be granted and to report back on the financial ramifications of failing to meet
federal requirements in affected districts.
The new law is considered a course correction, easing
testing requirements and devolving authority
from the
federal government to the states.
By the time the lawmakers returned
from Easter recess, they had a deal: a bill that would keep NCLB's annual
testing requirement but strip out much of the
federal accountability that has led to cries of executive overreach
from Republicans.
Connecticut received a waiver
from the
Federal Department of Education
requirement that standardized
testing data be used in evaluations during the 2015 - 16 school year.
However, an amendment adopted yesterday would allow parents to opt their children out of the
testing required under the
federal law and would exempt schools
from including students that have opted out
from the schools»
test participation
requirements.
A statement
from Toyota said, «The IIHS periodically develops new, more severe or specialized
tests that go beyond
federal requirements.
The
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will hold a public listening session on Jan. 13, 2014, in Nashville, Tenn., to solicit ideas and information
from interested parties on possible knowledge
testing requirements for New Entrant passenger and property carriers, freight forwarders, and brokers.
Although rejecting any legal
requirement that disclosure be in the patent, both of the recent
Federal Court anti-disclosure decisions nonetheless found there was no sound prediction based on literature and / or inhouse
tests / documents
from the patentee.