Sentences with phrase «from federalism»

Hinz believes Australia's education system does benefit from federalism, referring to the country's two levels of government, in that it benefits from being primarily a state government responsibility as that is the perfect level to keep the system fair and suggested that the Federal Government may be trying to warm the nation up to its intention to step back from its current level of involvement in education.

I'm unsure whether, in the U.S., the organization of a two - party system benefits from federalism because the spheres of influence of local an national leaders can remain separate to avoid alienating constituents in one region through support of constituents in another region, or, maybe, because decentralized policymaking allows local parties to work together to elect national leaders.

Can anybody explain, in reference to the U.S. situation, why the organization of a two - party system benefits from federalism?

Aside from Federalism, we must also conclude that the Forteenth Amendment, that applied the First Amendment to the State religions, does also apply the Second Amendment to the States.

Not exact matches

Contrary to the cooperative federalism that he promotes, Mr. Pruitt has suggested that EPA should refrain from trying to control pollution that crosses state lines.

American states do enjoy greater discretion thanks to federalism, but our Governor has been influential, co-establishing the US Climate Alliance with the governors of California and New York after the US's departure from the Paris Climate Agreement.

We quote from some of them: The move from antiquity to federalism, Paris, 1977; The absolutist state, its origins and its paths, Paris, 1978; On Gramski, Paris, 1978.

Those very features that have made us different from other advanced welfare states, that have even made us seem «backward» at times — the variety of our racial and ethnic groups, the opportunities for creative innovation and experimentation inherent in our sort of federalism, our tradition of voluntarism, and even, within bounds, our attachment to a gambling, risk - taking, profit - making economy — may turn out to be conducive to the implementation of an ecological approach to social policy.

Virtually the entire Bill of Rights has now been applied against the states, achieving three revolutionary results at once: 1) The original understanding of federalism has been obliterated, so that the states exercise their power now largely at the sufferance of the Supreme Court; 2) The Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of Section 1 have become a kind of witches» cauldron from which an exotic brew of postmodern nostrums has been fed into the bloodstream of the political culture; 3) The Supreme Court has successfully arrogated to itself more or less exclusive powers of constitutional interpretation.

Meanwhile, it was also learnt that the ongoing amendment may deliver true federalism as the Senate Constitution Review Committee said it had got positive responses from key stakeholders in that regard.

Perhaps the search for justice would have been swifter and easier; and the national question, maybe resolved by productive federalism, wrought from hard compromise.

Contrary to a postulate shared by several Europeanists, European federalism should not be different in nature from classical forms of federalism developed at the national level.

In fact, two different attitudes from Spanish nationalism should be distinguished in order to understand why a federal reform of the system in Spain appears to be hardly viable (territorial nationalism) or not viable at all (multinational federalism).

As far as it is concerned, territorial federalism can certainly ease tensions and calm down temporary crises through concessions from the majority nation to the minority nations (oftentimes temporary), but the logic inherent to the system will sooner or later lead the minority nations (which can not cease to be in a minority under territorial federalism) to ask for full national recognition, either by claiming multinational federalism or by seeking independence.

My recommendation for urgent restructuring, devolution of powers from the Centre to the federating units, enthronement of true fiscal federalism, all of which the National Conference argued, fought for, disagreed, agreed on and finally consensualized upon, between its inauguration by former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, on March 17, 2014, to August 14, 2014, is to avoid a violent break - up of Nigeria.

On its own part, UYLA, while thanking the Federal Government for initiating the visit, called for true fiscal federalism as well as an increase in derivation benefit to the region from 13 to 50 per cent within every period of five years.

He recalled that that Awolowo during his time had charged leaders in the country to rise up to the occasion to engender true federalism and devolution of powers, saying that it was only in such circumstance that can prevent the country from disintegration.

The provision in section 162 (2) proviso that «the principle of derivation shall be constantly reflected in any approved formula as being not less than thirteen per cent of the revenue accruing to the Federation Account directly from any natural resources» runs counter to resource control as a principle of true and fiscal federalism.

Nigerians want true federalism or devolution of power from centre or call it resources control.

«Even P - Square wants to restructure from unitary form of partnership to true federalism.

Through the petition, Ajie made what she described as a clarion call on President Obama and other concerned stakeholders to «respectfully call President Buhari to order, prohibit violence from politics and rights advocacy campaigns, ask President Buhari to respect court orders or resign, support Nigeria and Nigerians to achieve true federalism or support the path to a confederation of independent states in Nigeria.»

In a remark made via his twitter handle, the former Presidential aide hinted that the real cause of the brothers fighting each other was because they needed restructuring from unitary partnership to true federalism.

«I can tell you that Nigerians from other zones are all agreed that only true federalism can save Nigeria, delay is dangerous», Uko stated.

But a 9th Circuit case from California, Renee v. Duncan, provides a reminder that federalism still lives, even in NCLB.

The multi-layer decision - making structure, while faithful in its way to American federalism, mainly serves nowadays to pull schools apart in response to funding and regulatory streams emanating from different levels of government, to foster bureaucracy, confusion, and tension and, maybe most importantly, to give every level a functional veto over reforms initiated at any other level.

Perhaps with a sense of the limits of federalism and of the limitless potential of education, we might be able to free ourselves from the sterility, rigidity, dogmatism, and narrow anti-intellectualism of NCLB.

The blow to states - rights principles from national standards could be softened with pledges to block - grant federal education spending and encourage competition through charter schools or school vouchers, along the lines described in the contribution from Chester Finn and Michael Petrilli in this issue (see «A New New Federalism,» p. 48).

The standards became increasingly politicized, with attacks from both the right (largely on federalism or anti-Obama grounds) and on the left (largely on anti-testing grounds) driving up opposition.

Yes, four long years ago, Checker Finn and I were still wedded to the «tight - loose» formula of federalism in education: Uncle Sam should be tighter on the outcomes expected from our schools but much looser on how states and districts achieve those ends.

Most intriguing about Secretary Duncan — from my perspective at least — was his early embrace of the theory of «tight - loose» federalism.

The Politics and Practice of School Accountability (co-editor with Martin R. West) The Future of School Choice (editor) Our Schools and our Future (editor) City Limits The Urban Underclass (co-edited with Christopher Jencks) Price of Federalism Welfare Magnets (with Mark C. Rom) The New American Democracy (with Morris P. Fiorina, Bertram Johnson, and William G. Mayer) Four of his books have received major awards from the American Political Science Association.

Federalism is not only distinction from and rivalry between the federal government and the states; it is also rivalry among the states and among local governments within the states.

Glenn C. Savage receives funding from the Australian Research Council as part of the «Discovery Early Career Researcher Award» (DECRA) Scheme for his project titled «National schooling reform and the reshaping of Australian federalism».

Glenn C. Savage receives funding from the Australian Research Council under the Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) scheme for his project titled «National schooling reform and the reshaping of Australian federalism» (2016 - 2019).

By teaching civics in tandem with experiential learning, YES Prep teachers, more often than traditional public or private school teachers, were «very confident» that their students learned «[t] o be tolerant of people and groups who are different from themselves,» «[t] o understand concepts such as federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances,» and «[t] o develop habits of community service such as volunteering and raising money for causes,» according to 2010 American Enterprise Institute Program on American Citizenship survey.30 As a charter network serving low - income students, its service - centered mission serves both the students and their communities.

This news excerpt was taken from an article posted January 16, 2009 by Mike on the CRIME AND FEDERALISM website, «A lawyer facing criminal charges for advising 10 nurses they could quit their jobs at a Long Island, N.Y., nursing facility gave «objectively reasonable» advice and can not be prosecuted, a Brooklyn appeals panel has ruled.»

The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the constitutionality of these cooperative federalism arrangements in laws ranging from strip mining to health care.

Federalism «seldom forces anyone to act but consistently opposes action... does not destroy things but rather prevents them from coming into being.»

I like both approaches — and I speak from a blog network that reaches across the spectrum, from illustrated blogs such as May It Please The Court and The Common Scold to bare - bones Crime and Federalism.

The New York Times has the details in this story,» Lawyer Thrust Into Spotlight After Misstep in Terror Case,» March 15, 2006, and lots of bloggers, including Legal Blog Watch's Crime & Federalism, are discussing Judge Brinkema's ruling to exclude testimony from several major government witnesses who were improperly coached by Martin.

Norm Pattis of Crime & Federalism takes this position that a family that «has neither the funds for a lawyer nor the charm to seduce a public interest group» should not be barred from the courthouse door by a rule prohibiting non-lawyer parents from representing their own children in these types of cases.

a broad range of issues relating to the structure of the government and to civil rights and civil liberties — ranging from racial justice to federalism from the right to privacy to the separation of powers from the right to vote to the role of juries — have a unique impact and import in the context of the criminal justice system.

When all «innovations» from that process made it into the Lisbon Treaty, that system of qualifications was left out as the terms used reeked of Federalism.

Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Davis v. Washington «represents a subtle retreat from the presumption of innocence,» argues Norm Pattis at Crime & Federalism.

Reading the same post over on Crime & Federalism, Michael Cernovich pulls a paragraph from Kerr's post and writes, «Orin Kerr just made someone smart enough to realize it a lot of money»:

Mike Cernovich has written a terrific post, «Federalism and Katrina,» complete with citations from Gonzales v. Raich and Gonzales v. Oregon.

Historically, some tax policy makers believed that it was unconstitutional to tax interest from municipal bonds (a.k.a. bonds issues by state and local governments) for federalism reasons.

A more recent decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal takes pains to insist that federalism continues to limit the application of provincial enactments to «lands reserved for Indians», even if this may not necessarily be the case for rights protected by section 35.

I certainly do not suggest that principles of federalism should prevent Congress from regulating navigation.

As a part of US federalism, the rules about this change from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, so make sure you understand this.