They seem to think that any attempt to stop
them from forcing their beliefs on us is some kind of attack on their religious freedoms.
Not exact matches
The answer is that the Christian right in our country is constantly trying to
force their religious
beliefs into the public sphere (science education, school prayer at public schools, Decalogue displays at court houses, nativity scenes
on city hall property, crosses in all kinds of public places, national days of prayer, etc.)-- if these things stopped, the outcry
from us non-believers would be greatly diminished.
Logical deduction prevents them
from continuing to believe
on their own, but many are
force fed the continued
belief in God out of their parents own indoctrinated fears.
I'm atheist and part of me thinks the organization's time could be better spent countering the religious hellbent
on forcing their
beliefs on instead of trying to prevent them
from practicing peacefully.
Christians have voted to put their God's name
on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute,
force schools to teach intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws
on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain people
from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible
beliefs.
CNN: Catholics clergymen come out swinging against HHS regulation Catholics around the country got an earful
on Sunday
from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that
forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of religious
beliefs.
Washington (CNN)- Catholics around the country got an earful
on Sunday
from the pulpit over a new health insurance policy by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that
forces employers to cover contraception and abortion as part of preventative care regardless of religious
beliefs.
For all of you who work with us, you hopefully see that we don't
force our
beliefs on others, don't prohibit others
from drinking coffee or alcohol at work or work dinners / parties, it's pretty much like working with anyone else.
This freedom means that all men are to be immune
from coercion
on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be
forced to act in a manner contrary to his own
beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.»
THAT is the backlash you are feeling — the resentment that comes
from trying to
force your
beliefs on others, rather than «hatred» of you for having those
beliefs.
When I reflect
on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go in order to protect itself
from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious
belief which stem
from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage in a philosophical critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion
forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
I don't
force my
belief on anyone but i don't want anyone to stop me
from saying what my
belief are when i have to give an opinion.
We don't want to take your
beliefs away
from you, quite the contrary, we don't really care if you believe in the mythical sky god, what we care about is when you want to
force your
beliefs on everyone else.
I now my post will suck in a whole lot of anger but I figure I might try a plea to pull the hate away
from people who just want to live there lives with their
belief and who don't
force their opinions
on everybody with malice.
In recent years, evangelicals have pushed for greater «conscience protections» for Christians, hoping to keep believers
from being
forced to go against their
beliefs on marriage and sexuality at their workplaces.
There is a separation of Church and State and this separation is very well needed; not to cause the hypocrites of today's society to lose their hypocritical religious freedoms to be hypocrites, but it's designed to prevent the despots» hypocritical religious
beliefs from being
forced on the rest of us.
When he was with Jews, he observed Jewish traditions; when he was with gentiles, he refrained
from forcing Jewish
beliefs on them.
«We strongly
belief that President Buhari, must be seen to be acting contrary to court decisions
on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed
Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Ass
Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC
from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed
forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Ass
forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assembly.
What I'm saying is determining how much warming you would have today
from forcings in the past
from numbers that your
beliefs produce would be a good check
on your
beliefs.
[59] Justice Dickson's formulation of religious freedom [in R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd.] is founded
on the idea that no one can be
forced to adhere to or refrain
from a particular set of religious
beliefs.
Alienating strategies include bad - mouthing or denigrating the other parent in front of the child (or within earshot), 2,3 limiting the child's contact with the other parent, 4 trying to erase the other parent
from the child's mind (e.g., withholding pictures of the child with the other parent), 2 creating and perpetuating a
belief the other parent is dangerous (when there is no evidence of actual danger), 2
forcing the child to reject the other parent, and making the child feel guilty if he or she talks about enjoying time with the other parent.2 The impact of these behaviors
on children is devastating, but it also often has the opposite intended effect; parents who denigrate the other parent are actually less close with their children than those who do not.3