We discussed earlier that the banks benefit
from fractional reserve banking by being the first to access the new money that is created by their fractional lending.
But there are also some specific people that benefit
from the fractional reserve system as well.
The banks in the United States, and around the world, are not going to change
from a fractional reserve banking system anytime soon.
Not exact matches
(As an aside, equilibrium means «no tendency to change,» fiat means deriving its value
from law rather than some underlying commodity backing, and
fractional reserve means that banks hold only a fraction of deposits on
reserve, loaning the rest out.).
Here is a post
from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that
fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:
And Ben Lawsky, for all that he's a government official meddling in bitcoin, is also doing his part to prevent private bitcoin actors
from inventing
fractional reserve banking.
Central banking is perhaps history's best example of government attempting to fix a problem — in this case, the instability resulting
from the practice of
fractional reserve banking — and making things much worse in the process.
But an expert in that market, Jeffrey Christian of the CPM Group, acknowledged at the March 25 hearing of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, as he had acknowledged in an explanatory report published in 2000, that the London bullion market is actually a
fractional -
reserve gold banking system built on the presumption that most gold buyers will never take delivery of their metal but rather leave it on deposit with the LBMA members
from whom they bought it.
As we pointed out in a previous essay on
fractional reserves banking, a deposit contract is essentially different
from a loan contract.
That said, I love... just love... how you are going to increase liberty by * preventing * humans
from engaging in
fractional reserve banking through the establishment of a collective government to judge and imprison the purveyors.
Either can be tweaked to curb lending and prevent $ 700bln +
from entering the economy and being multiplied by our
fractional reserve system.
Under the
fractional reserve banking system, depository institutions lend out most of the deposits they receive
from customers.
Edit: A «debt - based society» is separate
from fractional -
reserve banking.
+1 for «living thing»... many of these notions that
fractional reserve is some sort of con come
from the fallacy that economies are a zero - sum - game, that for some people to get richer others have to get poorer.
Alas, like the Bourbons of old, today's politicians, central and
fractional reserve bankers have forgotten nothing and learnt nothing
from the financial and economic catastrophes they've repeatedly fomented — and thereby expose the rest of us to the next crisis.
From a financial security perspective, Poloniex does not operate on
fractional reserves.
Analysts have forecast that if Tether were operating a
fractional reserve and evidence of this came to light, it could trigger a widespread cryptocurrency market crash that could slash prices anywhere
from 10 to 80 percent.