Sentences with phrase «from global warming alarmists»

The other goes to «Global Research «who thinks it all is a, apparently mostly Canadian, conspiracy from Global warming alarmists

But the productivity and health of our grasslands, farms and livestock are under threat from global warming alarmists and green preservationists.

Our objective is simply to show that the debate on man - made global warming * isn't * over, and provide an outlet for dissenting opinion from the global warming alarmist dogma.

Not exact matches

Under pressure from a dissident group of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically alarmist position on global warming.

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

According to the latest panic attack from climate alarmists, the production of four major crops — maize, wheat, rice and soybeans — will fall by 23 percent by the 2050s thanks to global warming.

Although the alarmist side constantly moves the goal posts [from runaway global warming, to drowning polar bears, to catastrophic Greenland and Antarctic melting, to rising sea levels, to disappearing sea ice, to «global cooling proves global warming», etc., etc.], the simple fact remains that the UN / IPCC has been consistently wrong from AR - 1 through AR - 4, and the Gore / Hansen duo has been spectacularly wrong.

Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.

If it is any other reasons to the alarmists presumptions of CO2, then the solution to the global warming problem changes from one of prevention to remedial action.

The reason it disappeared wasn't due to rising sea - levels from global warming as the «alarmists» would like you to believe.

Until then, count me among the skeptics who consider this a political rather than scientific issue, especially in light of the fact that it is believed that the Antarctic and arctic shelves are breaking from stress (from «overgrowth»), not due to heat, since they are larger than they have been during recorded history, and that when the alarmists are proven conclusively to be wrong, they change the terminology («global cooling» to «global warming» to «global climate change» - face it, the global climate always has been and always will be very dynamic).

The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too alarmist».

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

The message I'm taking away from this is that if you are a Global Warming Alarmist you can grope women to your heart's content and get away with it.

The NY Times and Al Gore will not like this, but it is better to fight it out on the basis of the alarmists» invalid science rather than the moral wisdom of their alleged attempt to «save the world» from imaginary global warming / climate change due to human - caused CO2 emissions.

Many climate alarmists claim 97 percent or more climate scientists state carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is causing global warming.

Do you consider the fact that you actually believe 30,000 species are going extinct every year from anthropogenic global warming, and that this is not an especially large number, an alarmist position?

From New Zealand comes another example of climate alarmists «adjusting» temperatures upward to claim global warming that isn't, in fact, occurring, as shown by Joanne Nova «s excellent blog.

Climate alarmist scientists speculated that global warming from human CO2 emissions would somehow cause the El Niño / La Niña climate cycle to become stuck in the El Niño mode.

Global warming science facts from new research indicates that ENSO will not become a permanent feature as speculated by the IPCC's resident AGW alarmists - the massive climate phenomenon will remain variable

I was very skeptical of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (though not the possibility of some AGW) from the moment I heard about it as a major political movement, because it «smelled» to much like the Alarmist «Population Bomb» and «Peek Oil» movements, and was being pushed by many of the same kind of people.

We know from the geophysical record of the Earth that global warming alarmists deny that most of the Earth's history has been spent locked in ice miles thick.

YET ANOTHER dud - prediction realised from Global Warming Climate Change alarmist extraordinaire, Tim Flannery.

As a consequence of the towering example AGW True Believers bring to high science of approximating reality let us enumerate a sufficient example of their inability and fundamental inadequacy on the numerous occasions afforded them from the inception of their undertaking to effectuate an adequate understanding of the issues to be ascertained: The Global Warming Alarmists Still Don't Get It: It's The Sun, Stupid.

A cabal of climate change alarmists landed in Warsaw, Poland, last weekend, to hammer out terms and rally support for a new binding global agreement to «save the planet» from «dangerous global warming.»

Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.

I've come to the conclusion that the paper acts as an excellent carrot, which when combined with the terrible example of Mann's floundering to defend the indefensible (as the stick) may tempt some people to row back from some silly alarmist positions they've taken on global warming.

This is what happens when you send people from liberal Brown University, who conveniently come up with another scare - a-rama about global warming, in what appears to be another feeble «alarmist» attempt to counter climategate and all the other «gates» since.

The top French weatherman who was sacked from his state broadcaster for speaking inconvenient truths about the non-existence of «man - made - global - warming» has taken exquisite revenge on the alarmist establishment: now he's got a new job broadcasting from the Kremlin's propaganda arm, pouring

He told me that of course he receives private funding for his research: he has to because it's his only way of making ends meet, especially since the Alarmist establishment launched its vendetta against him when, from 2009 onwards, he became more outspoken in his critiques of global warming theory.

It is noteworthy that there do seem to have been more severe precipitation events since the global temperature trend started to turn downwards recently but I still see suggestions from committed alarmists that that is a consequence of warming rather than cooling.

We've all heard from the climate alarmist scientists that global warming is «accelerating» but is it really?

Susan Crockford is a polar bear expert with a message that climate alarmists don't want to hear: polar bear populations are thriving and are certainly in no danger from thinning summer sea ice supposedly caused by «man - made global warming.»

Singer has received funding from the Heartland Institute to «regularly and publicly counter the alarmist [anthropogenic global warming] message» and consulted for Shell, Arco, Unocal, Sun Energy and the American Gas Association.

Thus, environmental alarmists have made much of research claiming the Arctic's great white bear faces extinction from human - caused global warming.

Far from acknowledging their errors and backing off from their authoritarian agenda, the global - warming alarmists have doubled down and cranked up both the volume of their doomsday predictions and the audacity of their demands.

As the companion article to this one points out, virtually every major prediction of catastrophe that global - warming alarmists have made about the coming state of the environment over the past several decades — from melting sea ice and flooded nations to loss of snowfalls and increased climate refugees — has proven utterly incorrect.

The chart starts in 1988 (5 - years ending 1988) when NASA's chief global warming alarmist predicted (at a U.S. Senate hearing) that the U.S. would also suffer from the global warming trend with dire consequences.

From what I've read in the limited material online... I was particularly amused by section 7.1, entitled «Global Warming Alarmists» (sounds quite objective!)

Famous «Gaia» Scientist James Lovelock Converts From Alarmist to Skeptic on Global Warming, Blasts UN (video)

Alarmists have posited that global dimming from anthropogenic aerosols reduced the warming that might have been expected, some implying that dimming may have prevented catastrophic warming.

Perhaps recognizing this fact, Climate Alarmist have over time gone from focusing on Global Warming, to Climate Change to simply fear of Carbon.

Toni Massari @ 201, You get responses up - thread that pretty - much go not further than call your referenced piece in Forbes «To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here» out - of - date (from 2013) and denialist clap - trap.

As more and more scientists defect from the crumbling alarmist bandwagon, however, critics say the hysterical shrieking and dangerous rhetoric from politicians only serve to further illustrate the accelerating collapse of what many climate experts refer to as the «global - warming hoax.»

What we will find is that, extrapolating from history, it is almost impossible to get warming numbers as high as those quoted by global warming alarmists.