Not exact matches
Linguistic differences
from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, allusions to 2nd - century
gnosticism, and more — does any of this so far sound like political correctness?
[3][4] Reasons for this include its linguistic differences
from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, possible allusions to 2nd - century
gnosticism, encouragement in the wake of a delayed parousia, and weak external support.
In his fiction, the church exists on the periphery of the community's fellowship, and exhibits what philosopher Norman Wirzba calls a «disincarnate form of Christianity,» a kind of
gnosticism, isolated and disconnected
from where the people live their lives during the week.
It is only a short step
from this to the breakdown of narrative vision altogether, which happens in
gnosticism.
Instead of analyzing ancient
gnosticism, let me quote
from a term paper which was submitted recently.
Bloom, rather loosely, calls the American religion «
gnosticism,» the belief that each individual possesses a divine spark and salvation consists in the liberation of that divine spark
from the body and
from the particularities of its constraints in history and cultural space.
Even though the «historical section» or humiliation seems even to disappear
from some of these kerygmatic texts, their original intention was to emphasize the meaningfulness of Jesus» historicity or humiliation, and only with
gnosticism was this original meaning lost.
This attitude represents a kind of
gnosticism, as Oakeshott explicitly observed, and he traced the rise of Rationalism to a concurrent falling away
from faith.
Any defection
from high sacramentalism is gleefully identified as matter - hating, body - denying, salvation - by - cognition, capital G,
gnosticism.
To say otherwise is to revert back into a kind of dualistic
gnosticism, and the history of such isolationism and retreat
from all of God's creation (including all spheres of human endeavor) is very troubling.