Sentences with phrase «from high expense ratios»

Not exact matches

Since the returns from debt funds are lower than that of equity funds, a high expense ratio can reduce the returns.

The Fund's net expense ratio will be higher than 1.70 % to the extent that the Fund incurs expenses excluded from this arrangement.

From the group above, I have chosen to write about Utility Select Sector SPDR ETF because of its high dividend yield, great liquidity, and low expense ratio.

High expense ratios are one of the biggest factors driving assets away from actively managed funds.

The expense ratios range from less than 20 basis points for funds offered by Vanguard, State Street, Schwab, Northern Funds, Fidelity, Blackrock, and DFA to nearly 60 basis points and higher for funds offered by Legg Mason, Great - West, and Nuveen.

If you look at the SSgA funds at their website, the expense ratios are much higher, ranging from 0.18 % to 1.26 %.

The returns from a globally diversified all - ETF portfolio with an expense ratio of 0.15 % represents a high hurdle for investors of all stripes to overcome.

Expense ratios can range from 0.05 % to as high as over 5 %.

iShares sports the lowest expense ratio (all funds have an expense ratio of only 0.10 %), while Guggenheim's funds offer a little better liquidity, slightly higher yield (for a number of reasons, as we discuss below) and diversity from a larger number of holdings and by including financial companies in their holdings.

It would be unsurprising if investors in high expense ratio funds suffered more from poor timing decisions.

On the whole, expense ratios range from as low as 0.2 % (usually for index funds) to as high as 2 %.

Expense ratios vary wildly from fund to fund, and a higher expense ratio doesn't mean you're getting more expExpense ratios vary wildly from fund to fund, and a higher expense ratio doesn't mean you're getting more expexpense ratio doesn't mean you're getting more expertise.

However, these funds may have higher expense ratios or loads than comparable funds from different companies.

I don't expect a huge number of funds to choose from in a 401k plan, but all the plans I've ever seen are loaded with funds that have outrageously high management expense ratios (MERs) and they underperform.

The High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) saw its expense ratio decline to 0.09 % from 0.10 %, while Global Ex-US Real Estate (VNQI) had expenses of 0.18 % in the 2015 fiscal year vs. 0.24 % a year earlier.

Vanguard's target retirement funds have expense ratios that are, in some instances, only about a fifth as high as comparable target date funds from the other families.

The additional $ 31,668 represents a 10.4 % higher gain as a result of the compounded difference from the reduced expense ratio.

The active management debate implies that after all the additional management expense ratio costs, mutual fund trading costs, higher capital gains taxes, and extra time are taken into account, investors are supposed to have some crystal ball to sort future winners from losers.

Meanwhile, the expense ratio on the $ 2.9 billion Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (NYSEArca: VOE) is now higher — 0.12 percent — a 20 percent increase from the previous fee of 0.10 percent.