In other words, the slowed surface warming isn't a result of a smaller global energy imbalance due to factors like increased cooling
from human aerosol emissions.
There is a fairly large degree of uncertainty in these figures, primarily because the magnitude of the cooling effect
from human aerosol emissions is not well known.
The 2007 report focussed on greenhouse gasses, he said, whereas the 2013 report included all «anthropogenic forcings», including «the cooling effect
from human aerosol emissions».
Greenhouse gases can be attributed to about 0.9 °C of this warming, but it has been partially offset by about 0.3 °C cooling
from human aerosol emissions.
Not exact matches
China «could cause some decreases [in stratospheric
aerosols] if that is the source,» Neely says, adding that growing SO2
emissions from India could also increase cooling if
humans are the dominant cause of injecting
aerosols into the atmosphere.
The results imply that the interaction between organic and sulfuric acids promotes efficient formation of organic and sulfate
aerosols in the polluted atmosphere because of
emissions from burning of fossil fuels, which strongly affect
human health and global climate.
Aerosol particles come
from many sources, including
human emissions.
When
aerosols from human activities such as industrial plant and vehicle
emissions are added to the system, the energy budget has to deal with the increase.
Analyses of the ground and aircraft data performed by Setyan et al. (2012), Shilling et al. (2013), and Kleinman et al. (2016) showed that organic
aerosol production increased when
human - caused
emissions from Sacramento mixed with air rich in isoprene, an organic compound wafting
from many plants that originate in the area's foothills.
Scientists found that
emissions of tiny air particles
from human - made sources — known as anthropogenic
aerosols — were the cause.
Somewhere there should also be a cost in
human health bill for coal and gas — related to other aspects of fossil fuel epidemiology — like poisoning
from mercury
from coal
emissions or asthma
from aerosols from gas plants.
26 Sun Stepped Art
Aerosols Greenhouse gases Warming
from decrease Cooling
from increase CO 2 removal by plants and soil organisms CO 2
emissions from land cleaning, fires, and decay Heat and CO 2 removal Heat and CO 2
emissions Ice and snow cover Natural and
human emissions Land and soil biotoa Long - term storage Deep ocean Shallow ocean Troposphere Fig. 20 - 6, p. 469
25 Fig. 20 - 6, p. 469 Troposphere Cooling
from increase
Aerosols Warming
from decrease Green - house gases CO2 removal by plants and soil organisms CO2
emissions from land clearing, fires, and decay Heat and CO2
emissions Heat and CO2 removal Deep ocean Long - term storage Land and soil biotoa Natural and
human emissions Shallow ocean Sun Ice and snow cover
We have recently discussed several papers which have found substantial global dimming as a result of increased
human aerosol emissions from 1950 to 1980 and 2000 to 2010.
The black line, reconstructed
from ISCCP satellite data, «is a purely statistical parameter that has little physical meaning as it does not account for the non-linear relations between cloud and surface properties and planetary albedo and does not include
aerosol related albedo changes such as associated with Mt. Pinatubo, or
human emissions of sulfates for instance» (Real Climate).
The identification of other, sometimes more powerful, greenhouse gases such as methane, the contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide
from other
human activities such as deforestation and cement manufacture, better understanding of the temperature - changing properties of atmospheric pollution such as sulphur
emissions,
aerosols and their importance in the post-1940s northern hemisphere cooling: the knowledge - base was increasing year by year.
Warming
from decade to decade can also be affected by
human factors such as variations in the
emissions,
from coal - fired power plants and other pollution sources, of greenhouse gases and of
aerosols (airborne particles that can have both warming and cooling effects).
As stated earlier, I agree with the point that tropospheric
aerosols from fossil fuels are incredibly bad for
human health and other environmental impacts (black carbon soot, acid rain, radioactive
emissions, mercury poisoning), putting us in a situation of damned if we do, damned if we don't.
Aerosol particles come
from many sources, including
human emissions.
The failure to actually reduce global
emissions has meant that all possibilities are now on the table, including some that sound like premises
from a science - fiction novel:
Humans could sequester carbon dioxide by removing it
from the air through technologies that mimic trees, or we could spray water droplets in the lower atmosphere to reflect light and heat back to space, or we could seed sulfur
aerosols in the stratosphere to do the same.