The heat forcing
from human combustion of fuels, nuclear reactions, etc. can be estimated fairly accurately.
For decades, climate scientists have predicted that rising levels of atmospheric greenhouse gases
from the human combustion of fossil fuel could lead to global warming, and that warming would be accompanied by more frequent or more violent storms.
Vaughan's projection («scuse me, «extrapolation») of 1040 ppmv by 2100 is physically impossible to reach
from human combustion of fossil fuels, even if we burned them all 100 % up by 2100.
In this case, future CO2 level
from human combustion of fossil fuels would be constrained to the same as occurred in the past or ~ 110 ppmv above today's level = a bit more than 500 ppmv, rather than a bit less than 1000 ppmv).
Not exact matches
The greatest
human influence on the sulfur cycle comes
from industrial activity, mainly the
combustion of coal and oil and the smelting of sulfur - bearing metallic ores.
It then combines with pollutants
from combustion — mainly nitrogen oxides and sulfates
from vehicles, power plants and industrial processes — to create tiny solid particles, or aerosols, no more than 2.5 micrometers across, about 1/30 the width of a
human hair.
Ten years later, no one knows what was in the cloud of gases released by the
combustion of all that jet fuel and building material but science has revealed what was in the dust — cement, steel, gypsum
from drywall, building materials, cellulose
from paper, synthetic molecules
from rugs, glass fibers and
human hair
from the long decades of the two towers» use, among other items.
«It's one of the clearest examples of how
humans are actually changing the intensity of storm processes on Earth through the emission of particulates
from combustion,» said Joel Thornton, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Washington in Seattle and lead author of the new study in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.
In this study, Horney and colleagues focused on PAHs, which are a product of
combustion from human activities such as petroleum consumption in transportation or natural processes such as wildfires.
The precursors of acid rain formation result
from both natural sources, such as volcanoes and decaying vegetation, and
human - made sources, primarily emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide resulting
from fossil fuel
combustion.
These gases come
from human activities such as
combustion of coal and oil as well as natural sources such as emissions
from plants.
Human influences on the climate (largely the accumulation of CO2
from fossil fuel
combustion) are a physically small (1 %) effect on a complex, chaotic, multicomponent and multiscale system.
I just go to the section where they get into discussing Arctic seabed methane in more detail, and the conclusion of that section is actually: «In summary, the ocean methane hydrate pool has strong potential to amplify the
human CO2 release
from fossil fuel
combustion over time scales of decades to centuries.»
It's good old fashioned black carbon soot — a visible pollutant with measurable effects on
human health both in poor places, where it comes
from cooking or heating using coal, firewood or dung, and rich countries, where it is produced mainly through the
combustion of diesel and similar fuels and
from some industries.
While the best - known pollution in Mexico is Mexico City's air, which mainly comes
from the
combustion of vehicle fuel, it's not the only place with a problem or the only kind of pollution in circulation posing a serious risk to
human health.
He explained that an article I wrote in 2002 about fires, both natural and
human caused, smoldering in coal seams around the world, inspired him, while he was completing a doctorate at the University of California, Berkeley, to switch
from studying risks posed by smoldering
combustion in spacecraft to those back on Earth.
What makes the climate predicament even tougher is the uneven nature of
human development, and the reality that nearly all of the growth in emissions of greenhouse gases is coming
from a near - inevitable burst of fossil fuel
combustion in fast - growing developing countries.
So, while Co2 can be shown to radiate heat in a lab, the effect of
human combustion of fossil fuels contributing roughly 3 % of the.04 % of the atmospheric Co2 levels will have, as I think you and others here have stated, a measured effect indistinguishable
from zero.
«Due to
human activities such as the
combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation, and the increased release of CO2
from the oceans due to the increase in the Earth's temperature, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased by about 35 % since the beginning of the age of industrialization.»
The Urban Heat Island Effect (UHI) is a phenomenon whereby the concentration of structures and waste heat
from human activity (most notably air conditioners and internal
combustion engines) results in a slightly warmer envelope of air over urbanised areas when compared to surrounding rural areas.
The American Lung Association recognizes that pollution
from the
combustion of wood and other biomass sources poses a significant threat to
human health, and supports measures to transition away
from using these products for heat production.
10/18/16 — Setting a tax on carbon emissions
from fossil fuel
combustion is considered by many experts, including two economic analysts writing in Issues, as a promising way to help control
human - caused climate change, but US policy makers have resisted.
What it does show is a major role for atmospheric water vapor, to which there is a significant direct
human contribution
from both the
combustion of hydrocarbon fuels and the cooling needed by steam generation of power, but one that is totally disregarded by Trenberth and the IPCC.
It's estimated that
humans emit about 11 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year, with 90 percent of it coming
from the
combustion of fossil fuels and 10 percent
from deforestation.
It then combines with pollutants
from combustion — mainly nitrogen oxides and sulfates
from vehicles, power plants and industrial processes — to create tiny solid particles, or aerosols, no more than 2.5 micrometers across, about 1/30 the width of a
human hair.
And I'm sure you will also agree that
humans can not emit more CO2
from fossil fuel
combustion than there is carbon in all the remaining fossil fuel resources on Earth.
The most recent report of the International Panel on Climate Change says it is extremely likely that
human influence has been the dominant cause of this warming which is driven by the build up of carbon dioxide emissions
from fossil fuel
combustion, cement production, and land use changes.
Healthy forests absorb carbon dioxide
from human fossil fuel
combustion and at the same time reduce regional temperatures.
None are as high as Vaughan's estimate or an extension of the Hofmann curve (1070 ppmv)-- which also lies above the «maximum physically possible»
from human fossil fuel
combustion.
Emissions
from human activities, particularly the
combustion of fossil fuels, are changing atmospheric composition, especially by raising the concentrations of climate - warming gases;
Three fourths of the carbon emissions
from human activities are due to the
combustion of fossil fuels; the rest is caused by changes in land use, principally deforestation.
Jim D is right in writing that «0.03 W / m2 is about right for
combustion heat», if we figure that the total
from all
human sources is 125,000 terawatt / hours / yr.
Overall, they find that by far the largest radiative forcing over the past 250 years comes
from the increased greenhouse effect, which we also know is due to
human fossil fuel
combustion (Figure 3).
Although carbon dioxide
from fossil fuel
combustion is the primary cause of global warming, other
human activities and greenhouse gases are also central to the climate story.
Bottom Line: 1,600 ppmv by 2100
from human fossil fuel
combustion is not realistic, simply because there isn't that much carbon there.
shale) for «inferred total recoverable» oil and gas at 5,100 bbl and 490 trillion cubic meters, respectively, I end up with a maximum possible CO2 level (
from human fossil fuel
combustion) of 980 ppmv.
The NAS National Research Council calculates that the health costs
from fossil fuel
combustion are in the billions: «WASHINGTON — A new report
from the National Research Council examines and, when possible, estimates «hidden» costs of energy production and use — such as the damage air pollution imposes on
human health — that are not reflected in market prices of coal, oil, other energy sources, or the electricity and gasoline produced
from them.
In summary, the ocean methane hydrate pool has strong potential to amplify the
human CO2 release
from fossil fuel
combustion over times scales of decades to centuries.
Sea level rise is happening everywhere, as ice caps and glaciers melt and the seas rise in response to global warming driven by prodigal
human combustion of fossil fuels, and researchers have advanced
from general warning to the kind of detail that could help city and state planners prepare to cope with flood risks.
Human emissions of reactive sulfur and nitrogen, derived
from fossil fuel
combustion and agriculture, have led to increased deposition of strong acids (HNO3 and H2SO4) and bases (NH3) to the ocean, hence affecting seawater pH (Doney et al. 2007).
¶ ¶ 38 («when used -LSB-,]... fossil fuels release greenhouse gases), 39 («use of fossil fuels emits carbon dioxide»), 45 («emissions resulting
from human activities are substantially increasing... greenhouse gases»), 48 («increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide caused by the
combustion of fossil fuels»), 52 («fossil fuels -LSB-,]... when combusted, emit carbon dioxide»).
[7][8] The vast majority of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions (i.e., emissions produced by
human activities) come
from combustion of fossil fuels, principally coal, oil, and natural gas, with comparatively modest additional contributions coming
from deforestation, changes in land use, soil erosion, and agriculture.
During the past 500 years or so,
human activities have released mercury
from its relatively stable and water - insoluble form (cinnabar) in rocks and soil through mining, fossil fuel
combustion, and other activities, and so have increased the portion of mercury that is actively cycling through the atmosphere, surface waters, plants, and animals as it changes chemical and physical form.
The discussion may be «over» regarding the GH theory, that CO2 is a GH gas or that
humans emit CO2
from fossil fuel
combustion, etc. (with more affluent nations emitting more than impoverished ones).
Combine that with the direct damage that air pollution
from coal
combustion does to
human health, and there's a reason why some have called coal the enemy of the
human race.»