Sentences with phrase «from human decision»

The real concern lies with futuristic technologies that will rely on artificial intelligence and no longer require routine input from human decision - makers.

«Technology may let us talk together, and share information together, and analyze a few things together, but I wouldn't worry about going away from human decisions,» he said.

Not exact matches

How the Liberals are navigating the two sides in the debate is laid out in more than 150 pages of documents obtained by The Canadian Press under the access to information law that outline how the issue is complicated by existing human rights decisions, the requirement to accommodate workers whose addictions constitute a disability, workers» privacy rights and actually proving impairment, particularly from cannabis.

That means understanding that, while human beings will benefit from technology, it will take people to understand the value of decisions and the impact they will have on others.

Guzman's lawyers cited the a decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Human Rights Watch, and congressional testimony to underscore the dangers of solitary confinement and bolster their argument to release him from it.

Humans are creatures of emotion, which means eliminating emotion from a decision isn't feasible.

Because Paycom offers the most complete HR and payroll technology in a single software solution, report data is comprehensive to drive effective human capital decisions at all levels of management, from the C - level on down.

The advent of binary option robot, which primarily advise traders on the best decisions that have more financial gains directly from their smartphone without the need of a human - assisted interface show that people in the local financial markets can now assess and access automated investment advice.

After immense preparation and xpense, the ultimate point of human frustration and mortal decision making for climbers on Everest is being several hundred feet from the summit and having the weather turn bad.

life = human survive dumb decision learns from it and attempts to teach younger generation.

From the Garden of Eden to David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba, from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of From the Garden of Eden to David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba, from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of sin.

It is only because God utterly transcends history that his free decision to become a human being in time is also a decision of grace: «Far from implying a distance between the Word and the world, the Word's distinct manner of transcending the world implies a distinct manner of intimacy with the world.»

If we evolved from the lower primates, then when we reached the stage of reflection and conscious choice (when the image of God entered into that line of primates), we made the decision to «sin» — to dominate and to kill in order to serve our own ends, rather than to follow the call of that «image of God» which had entered into the human creature.

Relying on prophetic passages, particularly from Jeremiah, McCabe demonstrated the frequency with which God is shown to speak in the conditional form of address with reference to future events.8 These conditional prophecies, McCabe argued, imply that God did not absolutely foreknow free human decisions.

Salvation is a free gift from God to the human race, but each individual human has to make the decision to accept Jesus as their Savior.

Rather than viewing it as a decision made for the sake of living a life free from the world's demands, Augustine agonized over the «evils» of sexuality in a doctrinal context that virtually denied the human capacity for free moral decision.

But the experienced quality, the «being of worth,» is not itself a matter of human decision, for the essence of value, as distinguished from desire, is precisely the power of evoking devotion and of transforming persons in conformity with its own pattern.

Highly significant for Christology are these two quotations from Hartshorne's The Divine Relativity10 In the first he refuses to allow «paradox» to cover up illogicality: «A theological paradox, it appears, is what a contradiction becomes when it is about God rather than something else...» In the second he applies this to the relation between God's power and our human decisions: «For God to do what I do when I decide my own act, determine my own concrete being, is mere nonsense, words without meaning.

His religious difficulty came from the kind of theology he found around him, its habit of identifying words in a book (written by human hands and thought by human brains) with the words of God, also from the habit of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation of the freedom of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.

It is about whether rights are the product of human decision or, as the Founders declared, an endowment from our Creator.

It can not be the duty of individuals or society to take away the sphere of freedom, even in the case of wrong decisions, from other human beings.

It is after doing what is commanded, when everything has been done in the sphere of human decisions and means, when in terms of the relation to God every effort has been made to know the will of God and to obey it, when in the arena of life there has been full acceptance of all responsibilities and interpretations and commitments and conflicts, it is then and only then that the judgment takes on meaning: all this (that we had to do) is useless; all this we cast from us to put it in thy hands, O Lord; all this belongs no more to the human order but to the order of thy kingdom.

The first human being in the first moment of personal decision did not necessarily on that account have empirically to look and feel very different from what he does today.

The human enterprise is a great adventure, as we move from the relatively settled world of our past, through decisions and actions in the present, toward the unexplored but alluring world of the future.

However, we had to construct institutional devices to channel the market's floods of «creative destruction» away from human habitation — or at least the habitations of those economically and politically powerful enough to make the decisions.

The most critical years of decision in all human evolution, from thousands of years in the past to thousands of years in the future, are just these between now and 1984.

Vast swaths of political theory stemming from the Enlightenment speak of human beings as pre «social monads whose sociality stems from a subsequent decision to join a group from a prior isolation.

Simply put, there is no neutral ground from which humans form moral and political judgments because such decisions embody an embrace of this authority or that authority.

To fall away from it is to fail the human goal and at the same time to fail the cosmic process and the God who is the basic thrust or drive in that process, Our deepest human problem is to know and use, through decision, this capacity to develop toward fulfillment.

What is needed today, I believe, is the radical attempt to work Out a theological pattern for Christian faith which is in the main influenced by process - philosophy, while at the same time use is made of what we have been learning from the existentialist's insistence on engagement and decision, the understanding of history as involving genuine participation and social context, and the psychologist's awareness of the depths of human emotional, conational, and rational experience.

A decision to negotiate from within one of these two types and on its grounds is at the same time, however implicitly, a decision to adopt its underlying assumptions about what it is to be human.

If we ask how this difference arises, and if we press our question fully, we find that the answer is that in each occasion of human experience there is a decision determining the subjective aim of the occasion which may deviate from the full ideal offered the occasion in its initial phase.

If such an analysis involves any decision at all, it is the decision to exist; for it distinguishes human Being as existing from the «being to hand» (Vorhandensein)(Vide Heidegger, Existance and Being, p. 185f.

«Free trade» is the means whereby the most important decisions about human welfare are shifted from the political sector to the market, and that means to the major players within the market.

May 29, 2013 — Like some humans, chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit emotional responses to outcomes of their decisions by pouting or throwing angry tantrums when a risk - taking strategy fails to pay off, according to research published May 29 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Alexandra Rosati from Yale University and Brian Hare from Duke University.

The Protestant principle, in name derived from the protest of the «protestants» against decisions of the Catholic majority, contains the divine and human protest against any absolute claim made for a relative reality, even if this claim is made by a Protestant church.

From Qatar's summer temperature to human rights issues, and from the country's lack of football history to the number of workers who have so far died in making the tournament possible, the decision has been met with uprFrom Qatar's summer temperature to human rights issues, and from the country's lack of football history to the number of workers who have so far died in making the tournament possible, the decision has been met with uprfrom the country's lack of football history to the number of workers who have so far died in making the tournament possible, the decision has been met with uproar.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?

Journal of Human Lactation, Volume 13:1 Guigliani ER et al. (1994) «Effect of breastfeeding support from different sources on mothers» decisions to breastfeed» Journal of Human Lactation Vol.10: 3 Silverstein L (1996) «Fathering is a feminist issue», Psychology of Women Quarterly 20 (3 - 37) Pruett, K (1987) The Nurturing Father, Warner: NY Dunn J & Kendrick C (1982) Siblings: love, envy and understanding, Harvard University Press: Cambridge Mass

Cutting the time she has to think about this enormous life - changing decision from 90 days to 24 hours, not only devalues her as a human being but also devalues her child.

We may not all be in «this» together, because we're essentially making our own parenting decisions and taking care of unique, individual little humans and coming from varying backgrounds, but we can work side - by - side and support one another in our endeavors.

Our efforts range from a digital application that ensures human breast milk is safely pasteurized to community - developed videos on pressing health issues to supporting countries in tracking epidemics through data use for decision - making.

Challenging the Supreme Court's order at the African Court on Human and People's Rights in Tanzania, the lawyers of Woyome said: «The contention of the applicant is that following from the earlier concurring opinion to the decision of the review bench, the court can not be said to have been impartial.»

Raab argues passionately that the Strasbourg court and more recently the Human Rights Act have undermined democratic accountability by taking decisions into the hands of unaccountable judges and away from representatives whom the people can elect and dismiss.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) used the case of Jayson and Charlotte Carmichael, who successfully challenged the bedroom tax at the Supreme Court, to prevent other people from relying on the Human Rights Act when appealing against benefits decisions at the first tier tribunal.

Still, square topical in a round argument, though it is, I sympathise with the underlying theme The left ignore the profound human cost inherent in taking decisions from us.

The BHA believes that these age limits are incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and the related «Gillick principles», which have together established that rights should generally transfer from parents to children as soon as a child obtains sufficient intelligence and understanding to make their own mature decisions.

While human decisions will always be fallible), that might be a chance to step away from somewhat Panglossian tone defending of everything in this case, and perhaps acknowledging there might be things to learn from it for the future.

If the government is successful, it could prevent people from relying on the Human Rights Act to appeal against benefits decisions at the first tier tribunal, a route commonly used by many families to change decisions.