In response to my statement that it would have arguably been preferable for Hick's deity to have prevented all the suffering and destruction resulting
from human sin forgoing the satisfaction of having us develop authentic love and trust, Hick gave the same response as Hasker — that such deception would be improper.
Skills and technology of all kinds may be admirable, but the tyrannical or greedy use of human power over nature is a failure deriving
from human sin, not from God's intention in creation.
Not exact matches
First, he would have to have existed, then be reborn as a
human, then killed as a
human to pay some ransom price he set on our heads for the
sin of eating his fruit
from the tree he happened to plant right next to the hungry
humans he just made.
Jesus has been disabled since he rose
from the dead carrying with him the burden of the
sins of every
human soul, past, present and future.
Jesus is always pointing back to the broken
human heart as the spring
from whence our
sin comes.
His appeal to the dignity of humanity, the toleration of differing ideas, and emotivism finds a needed alternative in James Rogers» response
from a Christianity that observes how
sin perpetuates «the indignity of the
human person.»
Since Jesus was born
from a
human, he also part of
sin.
the negation of ideology, the political secularization of the doctrine of original
sin, the cautious sentiment tempered by prudence, the product of organic, local
human organization observing and reforming its customs, the distaste for a priori principle disassociated
from historical experience, the partaking of the mysteries of free will, divine guidance, and
human agency by existing in but not of the confusions of modern society, no framework of action, no tenet, no theory, and no article of faith, a distrust of the systems and processes of the idol of self and of the lust for power and status, scorn to all approaches of ideology and meta - narrative.
It's easy to see individual
sins and their aggregate effect alienating people
from one another and
from God in Sandtown: shooting another
human being or stealing to buy drugs are obvious as are landlords who won't deal with lead paint or officers who don't strap prisoners down in the van.
People do not care enough about
human suffering to turn
from their rebellion against God and
from their
sins and turn back to God.
«The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by
human hands «Acts 17:24 «Then I heard another voice
from heaven say: ««Come out of her, my people,» so that you will not share in her
sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues;» Revelation 18:4
From the Garden of Eden to David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba, from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of
From the Garden of Eden to David's adulterous affair with Bathsheba,
from Jesus» sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish human decisions and the consequences of
from Jesus»
sin - filled genealogy to Peter's denial of the Christ, we will challenge and encourage people of faith to tell the whole truth revealed in the Bible about foolish
human decisions and the consequences of
sin.
Afterward, many conservatives realized they could show compassion in recognizing the
human side and could support the antidiscrimination ordinance without compromising their theological position (viz., that the Bible condemns homosexuality as
sin from which persons need to be redeemed).
«Whatever salvation is... it includes the total transformation of
human life, forgiveness of
sin, healing
from infirmities, and release
from any kind of bondage.
Well if it's slightly more evidence of the existence of a man outside of Italy in the 1st century who was born of a virgin, died for 3 days before resurrecting himself, then explained he only died because of «original
sin» which is the idea that a woman ate magical apple given
from a talking snake in a garden at the beginning of time which caused all
humans to go to hell when they died.
We (
humans) are «worthy of death» (not just punishment)
from the moment we are born, since we are «flesh,» and therefore «
sin.»
It states that her «immunity
from the effects of Original
Sin» was «by virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ, Saviour of the
human race».
If all the genetic information
from a
human embryo were stored in a flash drive, would it be a
sin to delete it?
Thus Original
Sin (and its consequences) is not just the fact of a fall
from grace and destination in God, it is also a fact of
human biology, a fall
from proper union and harmony in the flesh and in the psyche of Man.
However, his proclamation of «a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of
sin» strikes most of us, if we are honest, as a call
from another world — a voice
from a wilderness that has long since been brought under
human control.
What captures Jones's theological imagination is Calvin's riveting descriptions of
sin's power to assault a
human being «
from the outside in,» co-opting the self's resources and eventually destroying the self's integrity.
Similarly, the doctrine of Original
Sin being passed on by physical generation, hence that we are all descended
from the first
humans who fell
from grace, is indeed defined de Fide.
Christ's love was life - giving because when
human hearts opened up to Him for whom they were made, the result was inevitably an increase in the life of the soul, a freeing
from sin, the lightening of a burden, and the joy that comes
from knowing you are close to God, or that you are loved by God.
This is because
human wickedness has real consequences, and therefore our redemption (i.e. how God saves us
from our
sins) is not just about God «turning a blind eye» to our rejection of him.
On question: if
sin was not imputed to people living during the time
from Adam to Moses, why did God destroy the entire
human race by a flood in Noah's day?
Sin is what seperates us
from God as
humans, and failure to accept Christ as Lord is what will seperate people
from His family.
Paul is * not * saying all
sinned «in Adam» — i.e. it is * not *
sin that is passed
from generation to generation (that is, that the taint of
sin was added to / imposed upon our
human constitution).
He gives the salvation package —
from sin and death and slavery to exaltation in the heavens (Ephesians 2:1 - 3, 6 - 7)-- freely, by His grace, without any
human works, effort, or sacrifice involved.
but if anyone truley had God in thier heart and had faith in the Lord... simply by folding your hands and asking God to enter your heart... (try it he will be there for you, and you will feel the joy of His love), then they would never do things like this... he obviously was not a person who loved God because No one with God in thier heart would want to do thing s like that... you HATE
sin when you truely love God, No ones perfect though, even those who belive in God we all stray
from our beliefs, its
human nature and the devil takes advantage of this.
This is because
human wickedness has real consequences, and therefore our redemption (i.e. how God saves us
from our
sins) is not just about God «turning a blind...
They believed that Jesus had come as God in
human form and that by his coming, and above all by his suffering, death, and resurrection, he had saved God's children
from their unfortunate condition of
sin and their resultant alienation
from God.
The Church also believed that these gods, for all their bluster and ongoing involvement in
human affairs, could not answer the deepest
human need: deliverance
from our enslavement to
sin and death, not mere solidarity and fellowship in the midst of that enslavement.
Their
sin cut them off irrevocably
from God and so God decided to repair the damage done by sending his Son to take that
sin upon himself and so restore
human beings to righteousness.
Redemption
from sin and undoing the effects of the fall are only possible for man because
human identity already «hinges» on Christ through the flesh.
At this level the set - up is, «Since everyone is corrupt, is it possible for even the best of
human beings to be delivered
from sin or survive the judgment of God?»
But like I also said, separate the
sins of
humans from the message.
The second principle for a sexual ethic is that we have to speak of sex, as of every aspect of
human life, in a double way,
from the standpoint of essential created goodness, and the distortion produced by
sin.
In other words, when theologians affirm faith in the transcendent God of the scripture, they are affirming faith in the God who has acted in
human history to make
human beings whole and redeem them
from their
sins.
Pushing it to the extreme, maybe Noah should kill any new baby girls to keep the
human race
from starting over and cursing the world with their
sin.
In the Bible
sin is not a deed; it is a description of
human life separated
from the love of God and experiencing the reality of lack of love, inadequacy, and insecurity, and seeking to create the missing ingredients ourselves and always at someone else's expense.
The unforgivable
sin is
from a
human perspective.
The second answer given to the questions mentioned above is that God is hidden
from man by
human sin.
It will begin a drama of
sin and redemption,
from which will emerge also the drama of
human politics.
The film hews close to the Christian notion of original
sin: Noah states quite forcefully that
humans have all been corrupted since the expulsion
from the Garden.
Without a doubt, it is the ever present reality of
sin, the
human condition, and how the bible portrays these concepts that is the most tangible evidence for the Christian God
from my perspective.
The widely held position that the spirit of the
human died when Adam
sinned is obviously an assumption derived
from the fact that he continued to live to the age of 930 years after his original
sin.
For Christians, «freedom» ultimately looks to freedom
from bondage to Satan and
sin, albeit with implications for bondage to other
humans.
If we evolved
from the lower primates, then when we reached the stage of reflection and conscious choice (when the image of God entered into that line of primates), we made the decision to «
sin» — to dominate and to kill in order to serve our own ends, rather than to follow the call of that «image of God» which had entered into the
human creature.
More will be said about God's answer to
human lovelessness in later chapters, particularly the one that deals with our salvation
from sin.
Then God and heaven... are now and here; and a change in
human consciousness,
from sin to holiness, would reveal this wonder of being» (Unity of Good [First Church of Christ, Scientist, 1887], p. 37).