This is the problem: just as creationists cite bible chapters as proof of their «scientific» theories; journalists are are citing what are no more than opinions, often
from idealogues, to refute data and analysis.
Not exact matches
Here's a thought — lets all conspire to keep young people (say, under 25) away
from fundamentalists and
idealogues.
The current occupant of the White House is an incompetent
idealogue who spends a enormous fraction of his time campaigning and collecting money, probably much of it
from residents of central park west.
How about quoting
from some people grounded in reality, instead of only talking to radical
idealogues?