For example, do you need a clear joint legal custody definition so you can understand how it differs
from joint physical custody?
Not exact matches
Joint physical custody or parenting time can be difficult on a child when parents live far apart
from each other or even just in different school districts.
Full
custody differs
from joint custody in that a full
custody arrangement grants legal and
physical custody to one parent as opposed to both parents.
This is still considered
joint physical custody because the parent who has the children on the weekend is spending pretty much equal time with them as the parent who has them
from after school on Monday until beginning of school on Friday since the weekend parent is with them all day Saturday and Sunday, as well as rest of the day Friday.
Nelson contended that the court should apply the Thompson court's language that a parent granted
joint custody or parenting time has the right to move up to 100 miles
from the parent's
physical location with the child as of the date of the court order entitling both parents
custody or parenting time.
If a parent awarded
joint legal
custody and
physical care or sole legal
custody is relocating the residence of the minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or more
from the residence of the minor child at the time that
custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances.
Some states separate
joint custody from physical care.
These cases fundamentally differ
from those involving
joint or shared
physical custody.
And
joint legal
custody, or shared
custody, with one parent remaining as the primary
physical custodian does little to alter the amount of time a child spends with the noncustodial parent, and does a lot to create control conflicts between parents who continue to harbor resentment stemming
from the failure of the marriage.
After extensive testimony
from both parents, the trial court not unreasonably concluded that it was in the «best interest» of the minor children that the father and the mother retain
joint legal
custody and that the mother retain sole
physical custody, even if she moved to Lancaster.
A history of perpetrating abuse or violence often disqualifies a parent
from receiving sole
physical or
joint custody, and might even require that visitation be supervised by a third party.
Joint custody, sole custody, shared parenting, primary physical custody, joint legal custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children from the damage that -LSB
Joint custody, sole
custody, shared parenting, primary
physical custody,
joint legal custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children from the damage that -LSB
joint legal
custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children
from the damage that -LSB-...]
One of the most common inquiries
from parents that are going through a divorce involves the different types of
custody, namely, what
joint physical custody is.
Joint custody, sole custody, shared parenting, primary physical custody, joint legal custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children from the damage that can be inflicted upon them by a contentious divorce and traumatic transition when their parents sepa
Joint custody, sole
custody, shared parenting, primary
physical custody,
joint legal custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children from the damage that can be inflicted upon them by a contentious divorce and traumatic transition when their parents sepa
joint legal
custody... In most instances, their real concern is protecting their children
from the damage that can be inflicted upon them by a contentious divorce and traumatic transition when their parents separate.
Children in a
joint physical custody arrangement suffered
from fewer psychosomatic problems than those living mostly or only with one parent but reported more symptoms than those in non-broken families.
Title 25, Chapter 4, Article 1, A.R.S. Section 25 - 403.02 defines the essentials of the parenting plan, which includes each parent's rights and responsibilities in terms of personal care and decision making in the areas of education, healthcare and religion; a detailed schedule of the
physical residence of the child throughout the year; prescribed courses of action when changes need to be made to the agreement or if the agreement is broken by one party; and a statement
from both parties acknowledging that
joint custody is not defined by equal parenting time.
Legal
custody is extremely important because the non-custodial (secondary
physical custody) parent can't be cut
from the decision making process if he / she has
joint custody.
«[T] here was extensive evidence of father attempting to alienate Hannah and Hillary
from mother that independently supports the court's disposition in this case [ordering that
custody be changed
from joint custody to sole legal and
physical custody of mother].»
A parent with
joint legal
custody but without
physical custody still has a right to view child care records about the child, like records of illness, injury reports, or notes
from parent - provider conferences.
«There are two key rationales which underlie and promote the concept of
joint physical custody: one comes
from a concern for the child, and it holds that equal or frequent access to both parents is in the best interest of the child (Wallerstein & Kelly, 1980).
Results showed negative effects for sole
custody: «Single
custody subjects evidenced greater self - hate and perceived more rejection
from their fathers than
joint physical custody subjects.»
In a recent study
from Sweden, researchers showed that children who live in
joint physical custody situations have better overall health and fewer psychological problems than children who primarily reside with one parent.
Significantly, it does not take into account another side effect of
joint custody: the hardship faced by the parent who shoulders the bulk of the financial responsibility by virtue of de facto sole
physical custody, with little contribution
from the parent who fails to meet the obligations ordered by the court.