In plain English, if unelected members were given a vote on the standards committee, its decisions, such as the suspension of an MP, would lose their protection
from judicial challenge.
Not exact matches
«We await the results of the
judicial review with interest, but whatever way it goes there will probably be legal
challenges either
from the side of the communities and organisations who took the review or on behalf of HS2 if it doesn't go their way.
ROCHESTER, N.Y. — Suspended Rochester City Court Judge Leticia Astacio is
challenging the ruling by the Commission on
Judicial Conduct to remove her
from the bench.
for the right web address); and later she had recanted her testimony and falsely accused me at somewhere unknown to me (even till today) in the
judicial system, which brought into our lives miscarriage of justice, with the collusive help of some cowardice and malicious
judicial officers ZZZ / YYY / VVV who hided their real identities
from us till today, though I as a victim have
challenged them to clarify the case with CONFRONTATION all the time;
A panel
from the Second
Judicial Department of the state Supreme Court's Appellate Division released the opinion Thursday, upholding the
challenge brought by state Sen. Dean Skelos (R - Rockville Centre) against Paterson after the governor appointed Ravitch, a long - time government adviser, to the position last month.
Since taking over
from the rather more liberal, Kenneth Clarke Grayling has attacked human rights as «political correctness», proposed dramatic restrictions to the right of individuals to
challenge the state through
judicial review, imposed significant restrictions on access to lawyers with no - win no - fee cases, moved the government back on to the course of building more (and bigger) prisons — despite the evidence against them — and is set on dramatically privatising up to 70 % of the probation service ceding state responsibility for offenders to commercial enterprises.
After observing this natural evolution and once the base guideline had been established, the next
challenge to be overcome was to check the viability of the method using spontaneously written documents whose exact age was known, such as diaries, laboratory logs and
judicial evidence
from judicial processes that had been closed.
Tamblyn tells BuzzFeed that she hopes «to elicit some fresh,
challenging conversations and examinations of who we are as a society» by flipping the gender norms, and says the book is about «survivors of rape and the commodification, denigration, and manipulation of their stories by everyone
from the American media to the
judicial system,» as well as also being «a story about how we dangerously demonize and mythologize women.»
«The
challenged statutes do not inevitably lead to the assignment of more inexperienced teachers to schools serving poor and minority children,» said Boren, who received his
judicial appointments
from Republican Govs. George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson.
Any legal
challenge to these regulations faces an uphill battle, yet
judicial efforts may be needed to prevent ED and DOJ
from using the civil rights laws to federalize all issues of discipline in the nation's schools.
INDIANAPOLIS — The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice released the following statement in response to a ruling this afternoon by Eighth
Judicial District Court (Clark County, Nev.) Judge Eric Johnson in a case
challenging Nevada's education savings account (ESA) program, which has attracted more than 6,000 applications since its inception despite legal
challenges preventing the accounts
from operating.
About fifty concerned residents
from across the region attended the roundtable discussion where Senator Bob Runicman talked about the steps anti-wind turbine groups could take to quash the act... like
challenging it in a court of law and calling for a
judicial inquiry.
Undeterred, Friends of the Earth, Solar Century and Home Sun then sought and obtained backing for a legal
challenge from High Court Judge Mr Justice Mitting, who said ministers were «proposing to make an unlawful decision» and as a result the court would be «amenable to a
judicial review».
Whilst the CAC's decision can not be appealed (though it could be
challenged by way of
judicial review in the High Court), the legal battle on the «gig economy» riders» status is far
from over.
The recent response of the CJEU to the Slovakian and Hungarian
challenge (C - 643 and C - 647 / 15, the migrant quotas verdict) to the Council decision on the relocation of migrants
from Italy and Greece (the relocation decision) seems to establish that the principle of solidarity between Member States in the area of EU immigration policy can be a source of EU obligations susceptible to
judicial enforcement.
The lawfulness or scope of a notice or subpoena
from a law enforcement authority may be
challenged in the Irish courts through
judicial review proceedings, unless it is possible to reach a compromise with the law enforcement agency on the scope of the notice.
Marc Beaumont is experienced in acting on appeal
from a number of regulatory bodies and in
judicial review
challenges in the High Court.
Mr Justice Ouseley handed down judgment today on a number of
judicial review
challenges to the Government's decision to proceed with a high speed rail link
from London to Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester.
We provide advice and representation through
from initial hearings to final hearings, appeals and
judicial review
challenges.
Quebec Superior Court Justice Michel Girouard is
challenging the Canadian
Judicial Council's jurisdiction to launch a conduct hearing against him stemming
from an allegation he bought illicit drugs at time he was a lawyer.
Defence of
judicial review
challenges,
from initial pre-action stages to final hearing and, if need be, appeal for health, education and local authorities.
Nigel regularly deals with applications under the Arbitration Act 1996, such as applications to stay legal proceedings, for the appointment / removal of arbitrators, for the exercise of
judicial powers in support of arbitral proceedings, and for the correction of awards, as well as appeals
from arbitration awards on points of law and
challenges to awards for want of jurisdiction or on grounds of serious procedural irregularity.
So, while it may be tempting to conclude that it is not an adequate tool for dealing with liability questions arising
from new technologies (given that it was adopted before even the internet rose to prominence); the reality is that the PLD has already risen to the
challenges of developing technology, aided by
judicial interpretation, over the past 30 years.
I've gone up through the hierarchy of legal forums all the way
from the BC Labour Relations Board to the Canadian
Judicial Council, both of which I am still
challenging.
In a case
challenging the existence and validity of a multi-million dollar condominium complex, Mr. Heffernan persuaded the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court to overturn an Appeals Court's ruling and affirm a condominium developer's retention of the right to remove land
from a condominium development.
Challenges can be made against requests beyond the scope of the instruction
from the
judicial authority.
The court found that the
challenged solicitation clauses only prohibited a
judicial candidate
from raising funds for another campaign, not in support of his own candidacy as the plaintiff proposed to do.
The plaintiffs
challenged eight restrictions on
judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on
judicial candidates campaigning as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on
judicial candidates making speeches for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on
judicial candidates making contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on
judicial candidates
from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates for public office, 5) the prohibition on judges
from acting as a leader or holding office in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on
judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during campaigns, 7) the ban on
judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court.
Employees, AFL - CIO v. Brunner, 1:10 - CV - 504, 2012 WL 6114571 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2012): A labor organization, three
judicial candidates, and a political party, challenged the solicitation clauses of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct which prohibit a judicial candidate from personally soliciting contributions but allow a candidate to solicit to groups of 20 or more, or through letters distributed by a candidate's co
judicial candidates, and a political party,
challenged the solicitation clauses of the Ohio Code of
Judicial Conduct which prohibit a judicial candidate from personally soliciting contributions but allow a candidate to solicit to groups of 20 or more, or through letters distributed by a candidate's co
Judicial Conduct which prohibit a
judicial candidate from personally soliciting contributions but allow a candidate to solicit to groups of 20 or more, or through letters distributed by a candidate's co
judicial candidate
from personally soliciting contributions but allow a candidate to solicit to groups of 20 or more, or through letters distributed by a candidate's committee.
[I] n practice, if the government's goal is to prevent most mental stress claims
from going ahead, then not
challenging the WSIAT's two decisions in court provides almost the same result as actually having them overturned on
judicial review.
«The maxim marks and preserves a great advance in the
judicial administration of law
from the days when a defeated litigant's appeal
from a
judicial decision was a
challenge to the judge to fight a duel.
The idea that environmental claims warrant different treatment arises principally
from the UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision - making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (the «Aarhus Convention»), which was ratified by the UK in 2005 and which includes the provision that «each Party shall ensure that... members of the public have access to administrative or
judicial procedures to
challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment.»
From the
challenges confronted in the organizations of courts, to the laws behind police officers lying under oath, this thought leader has some deep insight into the
judicial system, private and public defense, and attitude towards criminal law in the state of New Mexico, US.
It could also be a first step towards allowing cameras into other appeal hearings, criminal and civil — and
from there, to High Court proceedings such as
judicial review
challenges».
The Court may see more constitutional
challenges such as the Article 50 case, Miller;
judicial reviews of Henry VIII powers;
challenges from the devolved legislatures; and issues that arise because of Brexit but have nothing to do with EU law.
R (on the application of Cheshire East Borough Councils and one other) v Secretary of State for the Environment [2011] EWHC 1975 (Admin)[2011] NPC 92
Judicial review
challenge to decision of DEFRA to withdraw funding
from a part - procured major waste infrastructure project, with Nigel Giffin QC
R (on the application of Cheshire East Borough Councils and one other) v Secretary of State for the Environment [2011] EWHC 1975 (Admin)[2011] NPC 92
Judicial review
challenge to decision of DEFRA to withdraw funding
from a part - procured major waste infrastructure project
Panelist, «The
Challenge of
Judicial Reform — Case Studies
from the States, Rethinking Strategies for
Judicial Selection Reform,» Cumberland Law School (February 24, 2006)
The CanWest News Service article entitled Funding for minority groups to
challenge federal laws under review reports that the program, first set up under former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, «has been the target of harsh criticism
from social conservatives and critics of so - called
judicial activism, who assert the initiative is a slush - fund for left - leaning groups to circumvent the will of elected legislators by
challenging them in court».
[1] The Canadian Council for Refugees (CCR), the Canadian Council of Churches (CCC), Amnesty International (AI) and John Doe, a Colombian refugee claimant in the United States, filed a
judicial review application
challenging the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America for Cooperation in the Examination of Refugee Status Claims
from Nationals of Third Countries [December 5, 2002, [2004] Can.
It will also consider whether the absence of a Pitcairn specific
judicial review procedure mean the Government attempted to immunise itself
from challenge and whether the Appellant's conviction should be quashed because of alleged flaws in the prosecution.