Parliamentary privilege means immunity
from judicial oversight.
It is not, however, immune
from all judicial oversight.
Instead, the impression one gets, especially from Lord Reid's speech, is that there is now a list of nullifying errors, a list of reasons for judicial intervention in respect of unlawful administrative decisions, with no area of administrative action walled off
from judicial oversight.
... (Morsi) formally gave himself open - ended powers to make decrees that are immune
from judicial oversight (therefore barring any legal recourse against them), giving himself license to do pretty much anything else he pleases in the name of national security.
Not exact matches
A New York judge who was found to have verbally abused staffers and to have once triggered a «melee» over a court clerk hire he didn't approve of should be removed
from the bench, the state
judicial oversight commission said.
Despite the courts having played an integral role in serving as a check against states not acting in the interests of all students for nearly four decades, Sessions» campaign against
judicial oversight of legislative actions prevented the judiciary
from resolving inequities in the Alabama education system.54
Most Canadian provinces provide for
judicial oversight of prenuptial agreements but the standard of
judicial review varies
from province to province For example: - Ontario's Family Law Act permits a court to set aside a prenuptial agreement or any portion thereof if a party failed to disclose significant assets or liabilities, if a party did not understand the nature or consequences of the contract, or otherwise, in accordance with the law of contract.
Consistent with these earlier reports, the Commission strongly favoured statutory appeals over
judicial review as a simpler mechanism for legal
oversight that can be calibrated to address the particularities of statutory tribunal decisions, and recommended that legislation contain a right of appeal on questions of law (and in certain instances on questions of fact) to the courts
from the exercise of statutory power with only a few exceptions.
Otherwise the court risks becoming a primary decision - maker, which is some distance
from the arm's - length
oversight which
judicial review traditionally provides.
As in the NPRM, the final rule does not establish any new administrative or
judicial process prior to disclosure for health
oversight, nor does it prohibit covered entities
from making any disclosures for health
oversight that are otherwise required by law.
In a recent opinion piece, ACLU legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani argues that the CLOUD Act sidesteps
oversight from both the legislative and
judicial branches, granting the attorney general and the state department too much discretion in choosing which governments the U.S. will enter into a data exchange agreement with.