Sentences with phrase «from labelling people»

Thing is, I won't comply with the language police who want to stop me from labelling people who wilfully deny climate science as climate science deniers.

Not exact matches

They also impact everything from FDA food labels (think «Nutrition Facts») to public school lunch programs, recommendations at the doctor's office, and what people are fed from the Defense Department and Veteran's Affairs food programs to government assistance like SNAP and WIC.
From label execs to music bloggers to managers and beyond, there's a long list of people who an artist must build relationships with in order to reach larger audiences and expand their brand.
The Uberconference app has large, brightly - colored buttons with labels like «evict» (remove a person from a call) and «earmuff» (mute the sound for one or more participants).
From riding a bike or taking a bus to shopping at overstock stores instead of needing a name brand label, rich people are willing to take those extra steps to save money.
Where other companies supply their stores with headquarters - authored mission and values statements, Life Is Good provides loose - leaf binders labeled «Fuel» and stuffed with thank - yous from people who have taken solace or inspiration from its message.
Research from Label Insights showed that transparency was the number one factor motivating brand loyalty, with 94 percent of people saying they'd be loyal to brands that show complete transparency.
He's assuming people will realize from a label that GMO foods are safe, cheaper, and better than traditional farmed foods and choose to buy them over other foods.
Bill Slawski of SEOByTheSea — «I'm finally starting to see more people acknowledge how important the structure and taxonomy of a site is to SEO, from organizing the pages of a site in a manner that makes it as easy as possible for a search engine to crawl the pages of a site, to choosing the right words and phrases to label and organize that content, in as customer friendly manner as possible.
what people do not understand from the natural world, they label it supernatural.
People always talk about «label interest,» and you have that from here or there, but we started to not pay attention to any of that unless we felt that interest was something that was legitimate and real and it was someone who also shared our interests.
As a retired Pope, he will never be a free person, but kept under hose arrest and supervised, to stop him from speaking truth about college of hindu Mithra ism, racist savior ism, labeled as Christianity to hind fool humanity.
By dangerously labeling it a comedy, it allows racist people who actually watch it to dismiss its message instead of learning something from it.
What you are labeling groupthink here is a number of people who recognize the thoughts / feelings that come from someone who has been severely abused.
It took me a long time to reconcile what I was — a strong - willed woman who wasn't going to take crap from people who judge me because of my sex — with the label of «feminist.»
That being said, some of the hatred that comes from fundamentalist Christianity makes me cringe to take that label, because it makes it harder to convince people that I and God can love them as soon as the word is uttered.
He notes along the way that the Democratic leaders who try to pin the anti-Catholic label on Republicans are the same people who have slammed their party's door against Catholics who dissent from, to cite the most obvious instance, its pro-abortion orthodoxy.
To the folks who are vehemently denying this person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.
The same labels lay at the feet of all three, and why shouldn't it, they all started from the same group of people, it's a large highly dysfunctional family.
I have learned much from people whom my fellow evangelicals are quick to label as liberal Protestants.
It seems to my perceptions that you might be having a personal identity conundrum... Speaking from experience; many folks seem unable to cope with individualized rationalizing complexities... Giving up attempting, toward understanding social austerities which encompass individualism, gives people their identification of oneness... Individualisms are set upon the relativities of quaint somberness issues in daily moderations... Religious identities are as emotionalized labels giving people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental reasoning... Whether or not, religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to serve...
The thing that people want to exclude themselves from, be it the Christian label, church, religion, or even the institution, can directly relate and feed on the other, thereby creating a false dichotomy.
Most truly spiritual people would thank him for sharing, and not give him labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you claim to hate — labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different from your own.
But we have our own purity codes these days — people we cast out from our communities or surround with Bible - wielding mobs, labels we assign to those who don't fit, conditions we place on God's grace, theological and behavioral checklists we hand out before baptism or communion, sins real or imagined we delight in taking seriously because we'd like to think they are much more severe than our own.
For me this phrase just means that we should value, respect, cherish and love each human inherently because they are fellow human beings regardless of any labels we wish to put on them and that it is helpful and constructive to distinguish people's «mark - missing» behaviour from their inherent value as a human being i.e. «I think what Donald Trump said about banning all Muslims from the United States of America is stupid» and NOT «Donald Trump is stupid».
A one - size - fits - all label seems to simplify a difficult matter, but it simplifies too much by simply removing a whole category of persons from the human care list.
In The Culture of Disbelief, Carter tries to declare independence from another confining stereotype, this time the requirement of religious correctness that applies to persons of all races who do not want the media and intellectual elites to label them as nut cases.
Each new theology should have attached to it as it comes along a label that gives its proper place of application («Use only with people who have had four years of college») and a terminal date for its applicability anywhere («Stop using five years from date of issue»).
This faith helps to prevent him from applying the easy label «hopeless» to the people he can not help.
Our and «All» Creations ever being created by God, a name above all mannerisms to - be-named such as Jehova or Elohim or any other name calling and / or labellings other then the most simplstic and of God should all be stricken from all peoples» minds and doctrines and teachings!
People who suffered from depression and anxiety were often labeled as «unstable.»
It can not be labeled national in the sense that it stems from one state or political institution, for only for the comparatively short period of the reigns of David and Solomon was the people of Israel contained within one kingdom.
The more things we label «must haves» the more we de-power people by making it increasingly difficult from them to build communities (churches) in their tribes.
It's a big world, people can believe whatever they want without having to defend cult labels from groups of people who declare themselves moral arbiters.
That is why many people tend to shy away from labels.
People are too caught up on labels nowadays and it truly stops them from seeing the good in a lot of people and the good things they have to People are too caught up on labels nowadays and it truly stops them from seeing the good in a lot of people and the good things they have to people and the good things they have to offer.
My view (borrowed from William Glasser) is that controlling is just a label that we apply to people and like most labels it is not usually accurate or helpful.
Some people who are overweight are just a few pounds away from being labeled clinically obese.
A group of researchers from Monash University's Department of Gastroenterology in Australia first came up with the idea that FODMAPs were the underlying cause of irritable bowel in a high percentage of people who had been labelled with the syndrome.
Voice of industry... Kate Carnell, from the Food and Grocery Council, says traffic - light labelling is «simplistic» and hazardous to people's health.
Results from studies that only assess consumer preferences for different labelling systems, may be affected by other factors, including people's familiarity with a particular system and social desirability associated with particular responses, such as choosing the system that is seen to portray the most information.
The Age spoke to many people in the food industry about private labels but most declined to speak publicly, fearing reprisal from the big two supermarkets.
If maltodextrin is made from wheat, food labels will indicate that fact to protect people who are allergic to wheat.
Based on the labeling, I could picture native peoples creating their own agave nectar from the wild agave plants.
Some people may have sensitivities, which means they would benefit from carefully reading food labels to avoid certain E numbers, but most people will be able to consume these additives without any side effects.
For its planned convenience stores, Amazon is drawing inspiration from discounters like Aldi and Lidl, as well as dollar stores, which are expanding in the U.S. with spartan stores, private - label inventory and few employees, according to the people familiar with the matter.
I do not agree at all with his tactics (that didn't stopped people labeling me an AKB» er for which I could care less for it is exactly the Trump syndrome) and with his lack of rotation and adaptation to the modern football (result driven) but I admire him for not giving up an inch from what he believes football is.
suarez missed one too but the people here like bandwagons and the bandwagon from ox is «he misses chances» so even if he played really well and made one miss, they would label him as the non-improving british player who always misses, yeah somewhat they are right i accept that, but lets be objective in this half he played really well
Any signing made from here on out will be labelled a «panic buy» by some... Some people still to this day label the best # 10 in the world a panic buy!
I would never judge the morals of people I don't know, so I will refrain from labelling them, but the reality is that most people form partnerships within their own peer / social group.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z