Thing is, I won't comply with the language police who want to stop
me from labelling people who wilfully deny climate science as climate science deniers.
Not exact matches
They also impact everything
from FDA food
labels (think «Nutrition Facts») to public school lunch programs, recommendations at the doctor's office, and what
people are fed
from the Defense Department and Veteran's Affairs food programs to government assistance like SNAP and WIC.
From label execs to music bloggers to managers and beyond, there's a long list of
people who an artist must build relationships with in order to reach larger audiences and expand their brand.
The Uberconference app has large, brightly - colored buttons with
labels like «evict» (remove a
person from a call) and «earmuff» (mute the sound for one or more participants).
From riding a bike or taking a bus to shopping at overstock stores instead of needing a name brand
label, rich
people are willing to take those extra steps to save money.
Where other companies supply their stores with headquarters - authored mission and values statements, Life Is Good provides loose - leaf binders
labeled «Fuel» and stuffed with thank - yous
from people who have taken solace or inspiration
from its message.
Research
from Label Insights showed that transparency was the number one factor motivating brand loyalty, with 94 percent of
people saying they'd be loyal to brands that show complete transparency.
He's assuming
people will realize
from a
label that GMO foods are safe, cheaper, and better than traditional farmed foods and choose to buy them over other foods.
Bill Slawski of SEOByTheSea — «I'm finally starting to see more
people acknowledge how important the structure and taxonomy of a site is to SEO,
from organizing the pages of a site in a manner that makes it as easy as possible for a search engine to crawl the pages of a site, to choosing the right words and phrases to
label and organize that content, in as customer friendly manner as possible.
what
people do not understand
from the natural world, they
label it supernatural.
People always talk about «
label interest,» and you have that
from here or there, but we started to not pay attention to any of that unless we felt that interest was something that was legitimate and real and it was someone who also shared our interests.
As a retired Pope, he will never be a free
person, but kept under hose arrest and supervised, to stop him
from speaking truth about college of hindu Mithra ism, racist savior ism,
labeled as Christianity to hind fool humanity.
By dangerously
labeling it a comedy, it allows racist
people who actually watch it to dismiss its message instead of learning something
from it.
What you are
labeling groupthink here is a number of
people who recognize the thoughts / feelings that come
from someone who has been severely abused.
It took me a long time to reconcile what I was — a strong - willed woman who wasn't going to take crap
from people who judge me because of my sex — with the
label of «feminist.»
That being said, some of the hatred that comes
from fundamentalist Christianity makes me cringe to take that
label, because it makes it harder to convince
people that I and God can love them as soon as the word is uttered.
He notes along the way that the Democratic leaders who try to pin the anti-Catholic
label on Republicans are the same
people who have slammed their party's door against Catholics who dissent
from, to cite the most obvious instance, its pro-abortion orthodoxy.
To the folks who are vehemently denying this
person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a
person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately
labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a
person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent
person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote
from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a
person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.
The same
labels lay at the feet of all three, and why shouldn't it, they all started
from the same group of
people, it's a large highly dysfunctional family.
I have learned much
from people whom my fellow evangelicals are quick to
label as liberal Protestants.
It seems to my perceptions that you might be having a personal identity conundrum... Speaking
from experience; many folks seem unable to cope with individualized rationalizing complexities... Giving up attempting, toward understanding social austerities which encompass individualism, gives
people their identification of oneness... Individualisms are set upon the relativities of quaint somberness issues in daily moderations... Religious identities are as emotionalized
labels giving
people an ability to pause and reflect upon judgmental reasoning... Whether or not, religious agendas are servicing and served with ever those willing to serve...
The thing that
people want to exclude themselves
from, be it the Christian
label, church, religion, or even the institution, can directly relate and feed on the other, thereby creating a false dichotomy.
Most truly spiritual
people would thank him for sharing, and not give him
labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you claim to hate —
labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different
from your own.
But we have our own purity codes these days —
people we cast out
from our communities or surround with Bible - wielding mobs,
labels we assign to those who don't fit, conditions we place on God's grace, theological and behavioral checklists we hand out before baptism or communion, sins real or imagined we delight in taking seriously because we'd like to think they are much more severe than our own.
For me this phrase just means that we should value, respect, cherish and love each human inherently because they are fellow human beings regardless of any
labels we wish to put on them and that it is helpful and constructive to distinguish
people's «mark - missing» behaviour
from their inherent value as a human being i.e. «I think what Donald Trump said about banning all Muslims
from the United States of America is stupid» and NOT «Donald Trump is stupid».
A one - size - fits - all
label seems to simplify a difficult matter, but it simplifies too much by simply removing a whole category of
persons from the human care list.
In The Culture of Disbelief, Carter tries to declare independence
from another confining stereotype, this time the requirement of religious correctness that applies to
persons of all races who do not want the media and intellectual elites to
label them as nut cases.
Each new theology should have attached to it as it comes along a
label that gives its proper place of application («Use only with
people who have had four years of college») and a terminal date for its applicability anywhere («Stop using five years
from date of issue»).
This faith helps to prevent him
from applying the easy
label «hopeless» to the
people he can not help.
Our and «All» Creations ever being created by God, a name above all mannerisms to - be-named such as Jehova or Elohim or any other name calling and / or
labellings other then the most simplstic and of God should all be stricken
from all
peoples» minds and doctrines and teachings!
People who suffered
from depression and anxiety were often
labeled as «unstable.»
It can not be
labeled national in the sense that it stems
from one state or political institution, for only for the comparatively short period of the reigns of David and Solomon was the
people of Israel contained within one kingdom.
The more things we
label «must haves» the more we de-power
people by making it increasingly difficult
from them to build communities (churches) in their tribes.
It's a big world,
people can believe whatever they want without having to defend cult
labels from groups of
people who declare themselves moral arbiters.
That is why many
people tend to shy away
from labels.
People are too caught up on labels nowadays and it truly stops them from seeing the good in a lot of people and the good things they have to
People are too caught up on
labels nowadays and it truly stops them
from seeing the good in a lot of
people and the good things they have to
people and the good things they have to offer.
My view (borrowed
from William Glasser) is that controlling is just a
label that we apply to
people and like most
labels it is not usually accurate or helpful.
Some
people who are overweight are just a few pounds away
from being
labeled clinically obese.
A group of researchers
from Monash University's Department of Gastroenterology in Australia first came up with the idea that FODMAPs were the underlying cause of irritable bowel in a high percentage of
people who had been
labelled with the syndrome.
Voice of industry... Kate Carnell,
from the Food and Grocery Council, says traffic - light
labelling is «simplistic» and hazardous to
people's health.
Results
from studies that only assess consumer preferences for different
labelling systems, may be affected by other factors, including
people's familiarity with a particular system and social desirability associated with particular responses, such as choosing the system that is seen to portray the most information.
The Age spoke to many
people in the food industry about private
labels but most declined to speak publicly, fearing reprisal
from the big two supermarkets.
If maltodextrin is made
from wheat, food
labels will indicate that fact to protect
people who are allergic to wheat.
Based on the
labeling, I could picture native
peoples creating their own agave nectar
from the wild agave plants.
Some
people may have sensitivities, which means they would benefit
from carefully reading food
labels to avoid certain E numbers, but most
people will be able to consume these additives without any side effects.
For its planned convenience stores, Amazon is drawing inspiration
from discounters like Aldi and Lidl, as well as dollar stores, which are expanding in the U.S. with spartan stores, private -
label inventory and few employees, according to the
people familiar with the matter.
I do not agree at all with his tactics (that didn't stopped
people labeling me an AKB» er for which I could care less for it is exactly the Trump syndrome) and with his lack of rotation and adaptation to the modern football (result driven) but I admire him for not giving up an inch
from what he believes football is.
suarez missed one too but the
people here like bandwagons and the bandwagon
from ox is «he misses chances» so even if he played really well and made one miss, they would
label him as the non-improving british player who always misses, yeah somewhat they are right i accept that, but lets be objective in this half he played really well
Any signing made
from here on out will be
labelled a «panic buy» by some... Some
people still to this day
label the best # 10 in the world a panic buy!
I would never judge the morals of
people I don't know, so I will refrain
from labelling them, but the reality is that most
people form partnerships within their own peer / social group.