Of course, one would hope that turning away
from nuclear expansion would spur the growth of alternatives such as wind power and other forms of renewable energy.
Not exact matches
1) Repeal the Triborough Amendment; 2) State pick - up of Medicaid costs
from counties; 3) Roll - back of Medicaid entitlements / coverages to median national levels; 4) Major reform of SEQR process which blocks projects Upstate; 5) Repeal NY's participation in RGGI; 6) Cut 50 percent of staff at DOE, DOH, DEC in order to let the other half do their jobs, which means serving the people instead of feeding the bureaucratic monster; 7) Support
expansion of
nuclear plants at Oswego, construction of new plants elsewhere; 8) Tort reform to allow doctors to practice medicine, instead of fleeing NY; 9) Use the bully pulpit to support natural gas drilling and tell the envirowackos to grow up.
A New York congresswoman has written to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission about assessing potential dangers
from a proposed pipeline
expansion near Westchester County - based Indian Point.
Russian senator promises
nuclear response to NATO
expansion — there will be a harsh and unambiguous response
from Russia's side.
MG2 introduced the now commonplace story beats of war and
nuclear weapons, as well as adding massive
expansions to the stealth gameplay
from the original Metal Gear.
I am therefore surprised that Ike Solem (# 14), Joseph Romm (# 15) and SecularAnimist (# 18) all prosetalise about the risks we face and the benefits of wind and solar energy solutions but, nevertheless, appear to turn their faces against any major
expansion in the use power
from nuclear fission, apparently regardless of the type of fission.
Of course, the barriers to a fast
expansion of the world's
nuclear power plants, whether for electricity or fuel manufacturing, remain daunting — including everything
from the lack of permanent waste - disposal options to tough financing and persistent public concerns about safety.
From a global perspective, we are faced with daunting challenges as documented in World Resources, 1996 - 97: the accelerating confluence of population expansion, increased demand for energy, food, clean drinking water, adequate housing, the destructive environmental effects of pollution from fossil fuels and nuclear waste, plus the growing divergence between the haves and have - nots and the potential for ensuing confli
From a global perspective, we are faced with daunting challenges as documented in World Resources, 1996 - 97: the accelerating confluence of population
expansion, increased demand for energy, food, clean drinking water, adequate housing, the destructive environmental effects of pollution
from fossil fuels and nuclear waste, plus the growing divergence between the haves and have - nots and the potential for ensuing confli
from fossil fuels and
nuclear waste, plus the growing divergence between the haves and have - nots and the potential for ensuing conflicts.
The Act arises
from a letter
from a group of health physicists who pointed out that the limited understanding of low - dose health risks impairs the nation's decision - making capabilities, whether in responding to radiological events involving large populations such as the 2011 Fukushima accident or in areas such as the rapid increase in radiation - based medical procedures, the cleanup of radioactive contamination
from legacy sites and the
expansion of civilian
nuclear energy.
Atomic humanists must take a page
from South Korea — whose «citizen jury» decided to continue that country's
nuclear expansion — and seek our saving power precisely where the danger lies.
For decades, Mr. Choi has consistently opposed destructive environmental practices in Korea, whether they are
from rampant production of
nuclear facilities with its inherent byproduct of excessive and dangerous
nuclear waste or the widespread increase of toxic byproducts despoiling the air and water of Korea due to unchecked
expansion of manufacturing facilities.
-- Instruct the new Energy Secretary to work with oil and gas industry to put together and implement an energy independence plan, with the clear goal of making the USA a net exporter of energy products within four years, at the same time creating millions of new jobs — Instruct the EPA Director to work with coal burning companies to encourage «clean coal» projects (eliminating pollution), by offering tax incentives for those who invest in these projects — Instruct the new Energy Secretary to set up a special task force to encourage the
expansion of
nuclear power and ease the permit procedure for new or expanded plants, with the goal of increasing
nuclear power generation
from 20 % to 25 % within four years
From the wider environmental perspective, meanwhile, even a tenfold expansion in nuclear capacity by 2100 would by itself barely reduce the atmospheric burden of CO2 — from a projected 900 ppm (parts per million) to 820 ppm, both catastrophically higher than today's concentration of 380 ppm, according to Daniel Sch
From the wider environmental perspective, meanwhile, even a tenfold
expansion in
nuclear capacity by 2100 would by itself barely reduce the atmospheric burden of CO2 —
from a projected 900 ppm (parts per million) to 820 ppm, both catastrophically higher than today's concentration of 380 ppm, according to Daniel Sch
from a projected 900 ppm (parts per million) to 820 ppm, both catastrophically higher than today's concentration of 380 ppm, according to Daniel Schrag.
One early study suggested that up to 12 GW of offshore wind capacity could be installed around Japan by 2010, generating around 39 TWh pa, about the same as was expected
from then planned 17
nuclear reactor
expansion programme.
And there is the reality that — in the name of protecting the environment — closing
nuclear plants in every case,
from Germany and Vermont to California and Japan, directly and instantly harms the environment by drastically increasing air pollution and promoting the
expansion of mining and development for energy production.
Although Latin American countries rely lightly on
nuclear power (only Argentina, Brazil and Mexico have plants, which represent only 2 % of the region's energy production), many countries had plans for new plants until this week: namely Chile, Ecuador and Venezuela, apart
from expansion plans in the countries that already have centrals.