Injury or Disease directly or indirectly caused by or contributed by ionizing radiation or contamination by radioactivity
from any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste from burning nuclear fuel.
Ionizing radiation or contamination by radioactivity
from any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste, from combustion of nuclear fuel, the radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of any nuclear assembly or nuclear component of such assembly.
Directly or indirectly caused by or contributed to by or arising from ionising radiation or contamination by radioactive substance
from any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel.
NUCLEAR RISK - Damage, deconstruction or loss to property is insured by — i) ionising radiation, or contamination by radioactivity
from nuclear fuel or wastage from the combustion of nuclear fuel.
Loss or damage due to ionizing radiation or contamination by radioactivity
from any nuclear fuel or from nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel is excluded from the insurance plan.
Damage, deconstruction or loss to property is insured by — i) ionising radiation, or contamination by radioactivity
from nuclear fuel or wastage from the combustion of nuclear fuel.
Any bodily injury to the Insured person, consequential loss, legal liability, directly or indirectly caused by or contributed to by or arising from Ionising radiation or contamination by radioactivity
from any nuclear fuel or from any nuclear waste from the Combustion of nuclear fuel.
Any liability caused by or due to consequential event due to ionising, radiation or contamination by radioactivity
from any nuclear fuel or from, any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel.
These weapons are made from waste
from the nuclear fuel cycle and thus contain the whole lethal nuclear cocktail.
Thus, liquid sodium is the coolant of choice in fast reactors because it can effectively transfer heat away
from the nuclear fuel, while at the same time maximizing the number of fast neutrons.
Response: SMR - 160 is a small modular pressurized water nuclear reactor power plant that does not rely on any pumps or motors to remove heat
from the nuclear fuel, for all normal and accident scenarios.
These are used to separate and quantify uranium and plutonium
from nuclear fuel and liquid waste tanks, and measure trace and major elements in liquid and solid matrices (e.g., alloy compositions, or environmental monitoring samples).
SMR - 160, a nuclear reactor, does not rely on any pumps or motors to remove heat
from the nuclear fuel during any anticipated transients or postulated accidents.
Fast reactors can extract more energy
from nuclear fuel than thermal reactors do because their rapidly moving (higherenergy) neutrons cause atomic fi ssions more effi ciently than the slow thermal neutrons do.
Radioactivity and heat
from the nuclear fuel have fallen substantially in the past 5 years, he says.
The researchers discovered uranium
from nuclear fuel embedded in or associated with caesium - rich micro particles that were emitted from the plant's reactors during the meltdowns.
The plume resulted
from nuclear fuels fabrication activities that took place from 1943 to 1975.
Not exact matches
As much as Australia might benefit
from a cut in official interest rates, it would definitely benefit
from encouraging a new industry, such as the
nuclear -
fuel processing facility being championed by the South Australian government, and supported by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A plan to temporarily store tons of spent
fuel from U.S. commercial
nuclear reactors in New Mexico is drawing fire
from critics who say the federal government needs to consider more alternatives.
While Germany's official Energiewende strategy calls for a transition
from fossil
fuel and
nuclear energy to renewable energy, and reduction of emissions by 40 percent by 2020 compared to 1990 levels, the recently formed German government is more conservative than the previous governments.
General Atomics has received two awards
from the U.S. Department of Energy totaling more than $ 3.26 million to continue the San Diego - based company's work on developing new types of
fuel for advanced
nuclear reactors.
The sale is the first substantial trade outcome
from the Canada - India
Nuclear Cooperation Agreement and opens the door once again for trade in nuclear fuel, technology and se
Nuclear Cooperation Agreement and opens the door once again for trade in
nuclear fuel, technology and se
nuclear fuel, technology and services.
The Federal
Nuclear Waste Policy Act has mandated that deep - mine disposal of high - level radioactive effluent and spent fuel rods from nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screamin
Nuclear Waste Policy Act has mandated that deep - mine disposal of high - level radioactive effluent and spent
fuel rods
from nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screamin
nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screaming foul.
Thus Toshiba's profits for the past year were $ 1.16 billion, largely due to the purchase of Westinghouse
from British
Nuclear Fuels.
That is why the United States must lead the world in transforming our energy system away
from nuclear power and fossil
fuels and towards energy efficiency and renewable energies like wind, solar, geothermal and biomass which will provide safe and clean energy and create millions of good - paying jobs.
Russia has built the Busher
nuclear power plant in Iran partially at her own expense on the promise by Iran that they will be buying
nuclear fuel from Russia for this plant to operate.
Apart
from the
nuclear issue, the exploitation of Scotland's fossil -
fuel resources is a major industrial activity, and even more a source of tax revenue, while there is outstanding potential for renewable energy generation, especially wind, wave and tidal.
By divesting the state
from any business with corporations who
fuel Iran's terrorist activities and pursuit of
nuclear weapons, we are doing our part to make the world a safer, more secure place.
Indian Point's
nuclear power is neither clean nor green, and the process needed to create
fuel from uranium for its reactors is energy - intensive and creates greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
There is currently no approved national repository to begin removing it
from temporary spent
fuel pools located on - site at Indian Point and other U.S.
nuclear power plants across the country.
And he argued the
nuclear plants» output is needed as a bridge
fuel to help the state reach a goal of half of all New York's power coming
from renewable sources by 2030.
Many of the same warnings Mario Cuomo heard in the 1980s about Shoreham are the same ones his son hears today
from supporters of Indian Point: Closing a
nuclear plant will result in blackouts, a less reliable electric grid and increased air pollution as fossil
fuels are burned to replace the lost emissions - free
nuclear power; customers could face higher bills; more than 1,000 jobs will be lost, and tax revenue for schools and towns will dissipate.
At the time of the agreement, Cuomo and the commission argued that the
nuclear plants provide a clean bridge
fuel while reaching the state's goal of getting 50 percent of its power
from renewable sources by 2030.
David Tillman, a spokesman for Exelon, which operates the Nine Mile
Nuclear Power Station, said the company has offered to provide Fitzpatrick's
fuel at cost so it can remain open while state officials work out the plan for how to achieve Gov. Andrew Cuomo's goal to get 50 percent of state energy
from renewable sources by 2030.
Cuomo administration officials also said it would be difficult to abruptly transition
from oil and gas to cleaner
fuels without a bridge
fuel like
nuclear power.
My campaign is calling for 100 % Clean Energy in New York by 2030, including a complete ban on fracking, a phase out of all
nuclear plants, no new fossil
fuel infrastructure, and the rapid development of a clean energy system based on distributed renewable energy production
from solar, wind, and water resources and an interactive smart grid.
Cuomo administration officials also say it would be difficult to abruptly transition
from oil and gas to cleaner
fuels without a bridge
fuel like
nuclear power.
Nuclear is expensive, renewables are unreliable, and we are a long way
from making batteries that could power our
fuel - hungry lifestyles.
Of all the terrible news
from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant, reports about the spent
fuel storage pool for reactor # 4 may be among the most disconcerting for scientists.
But if the
nuclear fuel spreads out
from the implosion zone, input energy is lost.
A leading ecologist with decades of experience in the effects of disturbance on ecosystems, Woodwell shows that diverse industrial activities —
from nuclear power production to fossil -
fuel burning to contemporary agricultural practices — are affecting the chemical processes that underpin all life on Earth.
After all, no one has ever died in a commercial
nuclear power accident on American soil; in contrast, emissions
from fossil -
fuel plants kill 24,000 Americans each year, according to a 2004 report commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, an environmental group.
Irradiated
fuel from Nuclear Electric's advanced gas cooled reactors was expected to be processed at Sellafield, in the thermal oxide reprocessing plant, which still needs government approval to begin operating.
Electricity may be what
fuels our future — electricity
from renewables,
nuclear, and even
from burning biomass.
The issue concerns what to do with radioactive waste after uranium and plutonium have been recovered
from spent
nuclear fuel using reprocessing methods such as Plutonium Uranium Redox EXtraction (PUREX).
Domestic industries can make it
from a range of chemical feedstocks and energy sources (for instance,
from renewable,
nuclear and fossil -
fuel sources), and the nontoxic gas could serve as a virtually pollution - free energy carrier for machines of many kinds.
Japan's
nuclear plant crisis with the radioactivity contamination
from spent
fuel pools is likely to put an overdue spotlight on stalemated U.S. policies for managing reactor
fuel, authors of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology report on the
nuclear fuel cycle said yesterday.
Waste
from the front end of the
nuclear fuel cycle is usually alpha emitting waste
from the extraction of uranium.
That makes it likely that other groups will be able to quickly follow their lead to make a wide array of high - strength stainless steel parts for everything
from fuel tanks in airplanes to pressure tubes in
nuclear power plants.
Transfers of casks
from operating reactors could follow, and the report authors said that would help resolve a long - running court dispute over payments
nuclear plant operators are required to make to the federal government in return for federal storage of the spent
fuel — a bargain the federal government has not kept.