On top of that also add the waste heat from electric power stations, and even the thermal pollution
from nuke plants (Even though they do not emit co2) and airplanes and I reckon that is a lot of heat energy that used to be a form of carbon now warming up the atmosphere.
The idea is to avoid extra ionizing radiation, especially the kinds coming
from nuke plants and nuke weapons and medical xrays, when possible because there is always the chance that they can cause DNA damage.
But to move away
from the nuke issue in particular, is it really a great idea to provide humans with vast new sources of energy of any sort?
Thank heavens and Ed that we know that not one of these poor souls will die, since, by official decree, no one anywhere can ever die from nuclear radiation
from a nuke plant!
Some grenades have the ability to change the atmosphere around you by slowing time or explosions that result
from a nuke.
COD4: http://www.aoaforums.com/fo... Black Ops: http://www.gogaminggiant.co... Apart
from Nuke town, the rest of the Maps look decent, but their nothing special, quite disappointing as I know Treyarch can do better.
This week on the podcast:
From Nukes to Neuroscience.
Apart
from nuking too long and making a mess, it's inconclusive — gooey whitish translucent, not gel.
Not
from nukes or space stations, but information.
The nature of the attack and its perpetrators are not known, though Howard speculates on possibilities ranging
from nukes to biological warfare via the Russians, North Koreans, and / or Martians.
Since nuclear isn't actually a «burning» process, lots of energy comes
from nukes too.
Not exact matches
I say we take off and
nuke the entire Facebook site
from orbit, It's the only way to be sure they are not tracking us.
In other words, the «deplorables» didn't vote for Trump because they wanted a wall between the U.S. and Mexico or they wanted to
nuke North Korea off the map, they voted for a Republican because the previous Democrat took money
from their savings account.
From a very good column by pro
nuke engineer Kelvin Kemm, «Renewables Not the Solution for Africa:»
He says it derives
from the «combination of «
nuke» with the ending» - ular» inspired by similar words such as spectacular, popular, and molecular.»
this so called country took everything it could get it hands on
from land to power to money and even
nukes.
You might even hurt millions, or billions (and its just plain dumb luck, as you can see
from the war mongering and stupidity of «religious» political leaders, like McCain, et al, who have said it would be a dandy idea to
nuke Iran, that the body count has been higher due to people with lots of weapons, and countries full of people, who where duped into following insane people, because they where tired of the failure of priests to make the world better.)
Israel knows exactly what to expect
from us with regards to Iran developing a
nuke.
Well, I'm sure either way everything will be okay because Neville Chamberlin, er uh I mean President Obama has it in writing that we will have «peace in our time», or uh I mean assurance
from Putin that they won't build a
nuke.
You could even
nuke the potato when you get home
from work and then just let it sit on the counter until you're ready to make dinner.
Nuke Hopkins followed up a touchdown catch
from Tajh Boyd with a little turnabout on the two - point conversion, but not without getting Georgia Tech's defense turned in pretty much every direction.
If no one is willing or able to stop you
from launching
nukes at every major city on the globe, then it doesn't matter how many treaties you signed saying you won't.
Politically speaking, North Korea has every right to pursue acquiring
nukes since it announced its withdrawal
from the NPT.
If Iran wants
nukes to defend itself
from American imperialism, and America made Iran sign a deal to try and prevent it
from doing that, why would American politicians then say that the deal was a bad thing?
So, in essence, the NTP is a treaty where the countries who have
nukes work together to prevent anyone else to get them, which is perfectly logical
from a strategical point of view, but has no right to claim any moral high ground.
One lesson that many states have taken away
from nuclear politics is that it is very bad to be the last country without
Nukes.
Nobody has the power to stop US / USSR / China / UK / France
from having
nukes, whether they would like to or not.
How much this fear is played into the decision making is not known, but given that the Soviet General in charge of the Cuba missiles had to cite non-existent law to keep the Cuban's away
from firing their
Nukes (only a USSR soldier could fire them) speaks volumes about how much of a bad idea this was for them.
And while he likes to proclaim himself as a national leader on climate change, he is flooding the state with imported fracked gas, giving billions of dollars to old
nukes, and is getting only 3 to 4 % of the state's electricity
from renewables,» noted Hawkins.
OTOH, the Big Countries on the block sometimes have the power to stop other countries
from having
nukes - and note that they are not usually successful because they don't have THAT much power (witness Iran - despite all the posturing, the effective rate of success of everyone else in stopping - or even slowing down - their nuclear program is slightly below that of stopping Russians
from drinking alcohol during their Prohibition in 1980s).
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — A federal judge today dismissed a lawsuit challenging New York's groundbreaking subsidies for nuclear plants, clearing the way for three Upstate
nukes to continue collecting roughly $ 483 million a year
from utility ratepayers.
The 72 - megawatt array would benefit
from existing transmission lines and a substation built for the never - used
nuke plant.
Pakistan refrained
from using
nukes because they know once they use it against India there will be no Pakistan on World Map.
Republicans are hoping that North Korea's
nuke test will divert attention
from the Mark Foley scandal and move it right back into a comfortable campaign theme: the ever - present threat of total obliteration.
NUKE BILL OUTCRY — POLITICO's Danielle Muoio: The latest draft of a controversial nuclear subsidy bill is drawing widespread concern
from wind and solar leaders who say the newest language would hurt programs designed to expand renewables in New Jersey.
Since there are, however, some democratic (or meritocratic, as suggested by @gerrit) elements to the governance of this mortal realm - election of moderators, and so on - one model to which SE could be said to bear a slight resemblance is the Democracy / Theocracy amalgam of Iran (with, admittedly, many differences, not least of which is that Wikipedia does not appear to be contemplating an invasion of SE to prevent us
from getting
nukes).
England has 55 million people in an area that would make it the 32nd - largest US state: I doubt there's anywhere in England that's more than 30 miles
from a city of 50,000 + people so any silo would be inviting the enemy to send
nukes to somewhere very close to a lot of people.
They said subsidizing the
nuke to keep it running would be a waste of money, and they criticized Gov. Andrew Cuomo's plan to count nuclear power toward the goal of providing half the state's energy
from renewable sources by 2030.
Without that added compensation, many
nukes have trouble competing with gas - fired power plants, which benefit
from low natural gas prices.
The momentum
from a nuclear blast would give the reassembled asteroid a slightly different trajectory, so it would miss Earth if it was
nuked far enough in advance, she says.
In fact,
nukes and climate change are closely linked given that some see nuclear energy as one way to reduce emissions
from burning fossil fuels.
U.S.
nuke list mushroomed in 2003
from traditional Cold War adversaries to smaller nations with nuclear ambitions
Possibilities include a warhead diverted
from the U.S. arsenal or smuggled into the country by terrorists, or a bomb delivered by an enemy state such as North Korea, which has threatened to
nuke the White House.
We cover the scam with
nuke campaigner Kevin Kamps
from Beyond Nuclear.
Ok, back
from the kitchen where I just tested 4 powders, exactly the same: rounded teaspoon, about a half cup cold water, stirred to a slurry,
nuked until boiling over the top of my 10oz Italian milk glass.
Anybody analyzing this outrageous one (or slightly more) joke flic
from a viewpoint of feminism or masculism or gayagendaism deserves to get their shark jumped, their fridge
nuked and their skull bashed in by a naked Asian with a crowbar.
When an asteroid the size of Texas is headed for Earth, the world's best deep core drilling team is sent to
nuke the rock
from the inside.
And then the devs decided to throw in the
nuke subs
from before just to keep things interesting... It's a truly bold game design, and I hope it succeeds so more games like this will be created!
Instead of
nukes flying in
from the top in, here you have endless hordes of paper units that creep their way
from the right side of the screen and you, a paper tank, starts shelling these poor paper souls back to the recycle bin.
The shady government types were just gonna
nuke the site
from orbit anyway.