Not exact matches
He is a tennis administrator — a wonderful one — but by his own admission he is not a tactician, and
from courtside could not be expected to catch the little
faults that are quickly
obvious to a man like Hopman, a former Davis Cupper himself.
So we are no closer to finalizing the Aubamyang deal, just like Lemar in the summer, it's not anything new, what would suprise me is when we buy someone, so before Wegner focuses on Arsenal affairs he's busy having a dig at tottenham and like his biggest fan TY
from AFTV he ignores the glaringly
obvious faults with the team, which as most of us know is him.
- Wenger can be so insane to do it.The man is out of this world and complety insane.He can not see what it is
obvious for the entire world.To have better players on the bench and to keep favouring the same out - of - form or not good enough players week after week is madness.To play for draw
from the beginning against an awful team which got beaten by the entire league on a daily bases - this is something unimaginable.It is not Mertesacker
fault for being embarrased by any player on the planet, it is the manager
fault for exposing him as a laughing point of focus.Wenger must go, the man is deluded, he is scarred to take any risk for success.Well, guess what - only showing courage and breaking the risk can bring you success.Not the case - I predict a chain of defeats following, with the cherry on top being a big defeat against Spurs - a team which, despite our hate, plays real football (with great results I must say).
It's a parody of a parody, really — a self - satisfied, superior takedown of the
obvious foibles and, when those run out, perceived
faults of an imagined movie
from yesteryear.
How out of touch
from what is happening in schools and classrooms has our leadership become that they refuse to acknowledge the
obvious faults in their own arguments?
I don't even know where to begin trying to detail the game's
faults which is so
obvious and amateurish that I wonder if Bungie learned anything
from the first game.
If your position is that global warming skeptic scientists operate under guidance
from industries opposing CO2 regulation, are you prepared to provide specific proof of improper payments to those scientists, and specific proof of
faults in the scientists» resulting reports that are
obvious indications of industry - guided science errors?
To continue relating some of the issues of «
fault» within the «Terrestrial Greenhouse based Climate models», apart
from the
obvious discrepancies of the included materials behavior to those actually presented, there is the further exasperations
from the realisation of the «double» inclusion of kinetic energy within the calculations».
It is
obvious that collision coverage protects drivers
from financial losses dealing with damages to their own vehicles in accidents regardless of
fault.