Sentences with phrase «from potential infringement»

Our firm is also the place to find the kind of outstanding intellectual property attorney trusts for representing rights holders seeking to protect their intellectual property rights from potential infringement.

Not exact matches

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, including store closings, higher - than - anticipated or increasing costs, including with respect to store closings, relocation, occupancy (including in connection with lease renewals) and labor costs, the effects of competition, the risk of insufficient access to financing to implement future business initiatives, risks associated with data privacy and information security, risks associated with Barnes & Noble's supply chain, including possible delays and disruptions and increases in shipping rates, various risks associated with the digital business, including the possible loss of customers, declines in digital content sales, risks and costs associated with ongoing efforts to rationalize the digital business and the digital business not being able to perform its obligations under the Samsung commercial agreement and the consequences thereof, the risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, the performance of Barnes & Noble's initiatives including but not limited to its new store concept and e-commerce initiatives, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, potential infringement of Barnes & Noble's intellectual property by third parties or by Barnes & Noble of the intellectual property of third parties, and other factors, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Author, Declaratory Judgments — Trademark cases not immune from MedImmune: The potential for increased trademark infringement litigation?

According to the Fulton County Daily Report on April 13, 2005, Judge Murphy wrote that «the gravamen of Weyerhaeuser's liability is that, in addition to the funds that Weyerhaeuser received in connection with the IPO, the primary benefit of the bargain to Weyerhaeuser was divorcing itself from what it knew to be an enormous potential patent infringement liability that was substantially certain to occur.

If clients are potential indirect patent infringers, meaning they don't actually directly infringe, but they either contribute to infringement (e.g., they supply the key component making infringement possible in an otherwise not - infringing product) or their actions would arguably encourage the direct infringement of others (e.g., a patent claims playing a video game and the client developed the software and sold the game hoping hundreds of thousands of gamers would play it), how can we help insulate them from liability?

Examples of abuse of the PATRIOT Act include its use by the FBI to charge Adam McGaughey for copyright infringement after obtaining financial records from his ISP, tens of thousands of «National Security Letters» and a million financial records for certain Las Vegas businesses, and investigation of potential drug traffickers for alleged future crimes.

In practice, it is usually the first approved indication that is free of exclusivity protection earlier in time and generics, while submitting drug applications for an early market entry, carve out the subsequent indications from the label to avoid potential infringement of patents which may cover the new approved indications.

Second, some stakeholders said that the potential for large monetary awards from the courts, even for ideas that make only small contributions to a product, can be an incentive for patent owners to file infringement lawsuits.

The benefit derived from the infringement, potential economic growth to the surrounding non-Aboriginal communities, would not outweigh the severe adverse effects.

Potential perils of arbitration include the complexity of patent law, which can be difficult to manage for an inexperienced arbitrator; the uncertainty surrounding the application of res judicata in arbitration which may lead to separate arbitrations for each infringement; and a limited ability to appeal which may produce awards that deviate from accepted patent law (Ferguson, Cappella and Sandhu, 2014).

You agree to hold Relationship Coaching Institute harmless from and against all claims, liabilities and expenses arising out of any potential or actual copyright or trademark misappropriation or infringement claimed against you.