The Iranians grant this approval if the young Saudis will sign on to a form of adherence to Shi'ism that is comfortable for them because it differs very little
from the religious practices with which they are familiar.
One element of religious life which has almost completely vanished
from religious practice in Western Christianity, the exercise of meditation as a spiritual and ascetic discipline, is accorded a tremendous importance in Buddhism.
While the applicants in this case hadn't yet been subjected to such a fear, the Court found no support in these provisions for the requirement that one should abstain
from a religious practice in order to avoid such a fear.
Not exact matches
It also means that morality provisions can not prevent employees
from supporting a political party or
practicing a specific religion, for example (although some employers, such as denominational school boards, have argued successfully that their
religious beliefs allow them to hold employees to a different moral standards).
The
practice of using first names, surnames, titles, university degrees, or
religious designations varies
from country to country, so learn what is appropriate.
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and
religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and
practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover
from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Maybe we can look at it as a phase that many Christians
from all demographics go through before a renewal, and that would be a good thing, for since organized religion, hence dogma, doctrine,
religious practices, etc., is the primary cause for parting ways, it is a wake up call for the Christian church.
I am not sure that a
practicing believer of any faith, taking a break
from verbosity about their religion, will be any less
religious... or gain much insight into the commonality of humanity and human experience.
From 1518 on, it is the particularity and concreteness of God's presence that now foreclose idolatry; the true God, who by definition can not be used, is the God who makes Himself available as He chooses, in the flesh born of Mary and the Church's sacramental
practice, not in our
religious speculation and self - interest.
Where debate on the subject of religion versus secularism is concerned, it's always easy to find voices shrieking over the banishment of religion and Christianity
from American life, and claims the nation is morally bankrupt because of the success progressives have had with marginalizing or outlawing
religious practices.
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are
religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who
practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you
from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem
from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic
religious beliefs and
practices.
Home Secretary Theresa May said: «Many British people of different faiths follow
religious codes and
practices, and benefit a great deal
from the guidance they offer.
- But the difference is, Science eventually comes to its senses in the face of TESTABLE EVIDENCE and changes it's views; the thought of changing away
from religious dogma is abhorrant to almost all faiths, and change in
practices often take much time.
«The endeavor «to learn and experience the history of different cultural
practices» might in another year lead to historical re-enactments of anti-Semitic or racist ceremonies familiar
from Western history or parodies that trivialize Native American heritage or other revivals of cultural and
religious insult.»
I'm atheist and part of me thinks the organization's time could be better spent countering the
religious hellbent on forcing their beliefs on instead of trying to prevent them
from practicing peacefully.
Mormons do not run
religious schools that take public aid
from the state, such as secular textbooks, though that is a
practice approved by the Supreme Court in states with substantial numbers of parochial schools.
The Church has authority
from Jesus to «bind and loose» disciplines which govern the public
religious practice of the God's people on earth — this is not the same as the Divine Law of God's Word and natural moral law.
When danger of street violence prevented Arieh Klausner
from sending Amos to the school attended by the professors» children, he chose an Orthodox
religious institution» not because he wished to initiate his son in
religious practice, but because of animus against the alternative socialist orientation.
«Purify [the Hadith];... Find a new
practice of the concept of interaction between the sexes;... Separate religion
from the state;... Give guidelines on Western customs, and eliminate incorrect behaviours;... Invite the people to go to God through gratitude and wisdom, and not with threats;... Recognise the right of Christians to occupy important positions [including] the presidency of the republic;... Separate
religious discourse
from power, and re-establish its connection with the needs of society.»
«One of the more consequential facts of our era has been the... development of a sort of new phenomenon of non-state actors who, unlike the last century and the violence that we saw and persecution that we saw that emanated
from states, are now the principal persecutors and preventers of
religious tolerance and
practice,» Secretary of State John Kerry said at a press conference.
But we also pointed out that the «
religious» spirit is by no means absent today, although frequently it expresses itself in ways very different
from older and more conventional
religious attitudes and
practices.
Like anyone with a radio ministry over an international network I received hundreds of thousands of letters
from all over the world and, whenever they presented important questions about
religious faith and
practice, I answered them.
The Old Testament, however, as we shall see, clearly reveals the inner perplexity and the outward conflict involved as
religious thought and
practice moved
from primitive shrines toward the idea of Jesus: «Neither in this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, shall ye worship the Father....
In fact, I see the decision as a victory for
religious freedom in the sense that people whose religion supports and encourages same - sex unions will no longer be prohibited
from practicing that important
religious value simply because some of their neighbors hold a different view.
Further, the allusion to the
practice of not fasting during a wedding is an allusion to a well - documented ancient Jewish
practice of freeing wedding participants, including the guests,
from religious obligations during the seven days of the wedding celebrations (References in Billerbeck, Kommentar I, p. 506.)
The impression we receive
from the gospels, particularly the earlier ones, is that the
practices commonly regarded as
religious by the ancient world are never more than incidental to what He had to say.
But a close study of America's
religious history yields precedents and equivalencies to virtually everything that exists today,
from the demythologizing deism of Thomas Jefferson and the séances of spiritualists to the utopian settlements that
practiced everything
from celibacy (the Shakers) to free love (the Oneida Community).
But in many recent cases they have tended to agree more readily on another thesis: that the free - exercise clause does not interpose protections of
religious obligations and
practices that it once did (
from 1940 to 1981), and that the establishment clause does not have the, force against government action that it once did (
from 1948 to 1985)
You said, «do you think it was
religious bigotry guiding the establishment to ban poly
from Mormon
practice?»
The actual
practice of the early republic exhibited many accommodations between the state and
religious citizens in multiple warm and friendly ways that sharply distinguished the American way
from the rigorous hostility Maritain had known in France.
@LinCA: do you think it was
religious bigotry guiding the establishment to ban poly
from Mormon
practice?
but fortunately there are psychologists, mental health practitioners and others who do and I have benefitted greatly
from their work, personal testimonies and the various articles / publications which they have produced --(for example, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology; The
Religious & Spiritual Problems category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) published by the American Psychiatric Association; The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed.gov database of healthcare and scientific literature)-- about the adverse psychological effects which can arise when persons engage in intense / deep spiritual
practices such as intense / deep prayer, fasting and meditation which alter their state of consciousness.
Why don't you delusional automatons just
practice your silly
religious beliefs privately and quietly and stop subjecting us atheists to the collateral damage caused by the violence and destruction that is bred
from the conflicts between all of your various different «faiths».
Of course, the influence of
religious ideas,
practices, and institutions upon society had always intrigued the historians, but it could be assessed better
from the time that the organizations of society, to use Dilthey's terminology, were more clearly distinguished
from the systems of cultural objectification (law, art, science).
Exactly how would somebody
practicing Advaita Vedanta or any of the true mystical traditions benefit
from being part of a
religious organization?
So let me try and get this straight, if
religious doctrine does not define some
practice as against the law or evil but yet the laity performs these unlawful acts, it keeps the church free
from culpability?
A pernicious feature of Christian discourse in our day is its tentativeness, the corrosive assumption that everything we teach and
practice is to be subject to correction by appeals to putative evidence, whether
from science, history, or the
religious experience of others.
They often include provisions about
religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do in the case of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included in the relationship; what sexual
practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move
from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what kinds of freedom each partner is to have.
Like CIA operatives in a foreign country, whose cover masks a hidden identity and a hidden task, so are we to conceal our
religious practices from the world.
The kind of reading we
practice approximates what Paul J. Griffiths has called «
religious reading,» as distinct
from «consumerist reading,» which makes us users, buyers and sellers of texts.
If they are
from a biblically conservative tradition they are likely to use selected references to sexuality, marriage, and family to communicate the ideals of God in a way that will encourage and motivate people to strive for the ideal.6 This didactic use of the Bible fails to distinguish the radical difference between family life and the
religious practices of ancient and modern cultures.
It is to bad you do not understand the principle of this issue, of course
from your position you would probably just disregard your traditions and
religious practices and play anyways.
Spirituality needs to be
practiced subject to civil code untainted by
religious influence; it needs to be protected
from itself.
The American bishops did much better: while also making the matter optional, they offered a powerful and sympathetic discussion of the
religious reasons for the old observance and urged American Catholics to continue the
practice as a gesture of solidarity with, and gratitude for, the passion of Christ, as an act of fidelity to the Christian past, and to help «preserve a saving and necessary difference
from the spirit of the world.»
As a self - avowed,
practicing member of this band, I wonder (as we flee
from the wrath that is surely to come) if our work will be a harbinger of renewal in the church or another instance of nostalgia over a
religious culture rapidly disappearing.
Guess if you go back reading your history in Europe or in the MidEast you will remember that your ancestors were because of such wars and conflicts driven out or migrated in force measure to overseas for finding the land they were told that they can
practice their
religious or non
religious beliefs and rituals... Since then
from different continents for many years made of the few branches many more branches in Black and in White...
In recent years there are encouraging signs that the Court is moving away
from extreme separationism to a doctrine of «equal regard,» meaning that institutions and
practices can not be discriminated against simply because they are
religious in nature.
Buddhism, for example, originated when the Buddha perceived Hindu
religious practice to be too confining to bring the fulfillment and release
from suffering for which living beings longed.
There are surely multiple causes of this phenomenon, but one major factor has been the separation of theology
from the communities and
practices that form
religious identity and character.