I felt that the primary ambition of the book was to investigate whether a secular society could learn some lessons
from religious texts and from theist practice in order to achieve social cohesion.
Civil marriages performed under the Marriage Act, 1949 can not include religious elements, including prayers, readings
from religious texts or religious songs.
Some are
from religious texts, while others represent virtues, traditions, or aspects of belief.
Apart
from religious texts there is no evidence of a god.
* Random cherry - picked line
from a religious text * * Rambling nonsense that is only slightly related to above line * * Claim moral and personal superiority *
I actually love reading RIchard Dawkins, but I also love reading passages
from religious text as well.
The questions of the universe and the intricate workings of nature are far more awe - enspiring when viewed through the lens of science than
from any religious text passed down through the ages.
In America, marriage does not have to be a religious event, and quoting
from your religious text has no persuasive effect on those who don't follow your particular brand of religion.
Centrifugal meaning, in contrast, refers to the more numerous connotations and layers of interpretation that «spin off»
from a religious text.
Not exact matches
To put things in context, Bell followed that quote up by expressing his disappointment when communities of faith discourage people
from asking questions about
religious texts or beliefs.
There are many, many schools which prohibit any and all music with a
religious text from their curricula and prohibit teachers
from programming such music for concerts no matter how balanced the program may be (that is, it encompasses secular and sacred, accompanied and unaccompanied, difficult and easy, music in a variety of styles and
from a variety of musical eras.
You are advocating censoring education by prohibiting instructors who ARE musically knowledgeable
from giving students a well - rounded and balanced musical experience by pretending that there was no music of value that was composed with a
religious text or through the pat ronage of the church.
Why is it that these
religious fanatics want to mandate that non-adherents follow doctrine culled
from a little bible
text when they can't seem to even follow the 10 commandments?
The interpretation
from many Jewish Scholars and
religious texts is that it means «Chosen to Serve God» not better than anyone else.
You read the Bible (or some other
religious text), and I could say the same thing to you when you quote something
from it.
The «religiously devout» is important, for Geck puts to death the notion, prominent
from the early 1960s through the 1980s, that correct dating of Bach's cantata production proves that his interest in writing liturgical music was a professional obligation only and that Bach had no abiding commitment to the
religious texts he was paid to set.
We can't display
religious symbols or
texts from all different religions.
The «Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions» now known simply as Nostra Aetate (or, «In our Time,»
from the first words of its Latin
text), denounced all forms of
religious hatred, and called for a new dialogue among the world's religions.
A
religious text that can be used to justify everything
from unselfish acts of kindness to the keeping of slaves and the mistreatment of women is worthless.
Well, the faithful think the
religious texts are derived
from god.
The great irony is that some
religious fundies use the Bible to keep gay people away
from their «table», and feasts, using the very
texts that the Bible intended to teach hospitality, to do the opposite.
Raimundo Panikkar in his great collection of Vedic
texts for modern man or woman called The Vedic Experience, whilst recognising that the Vedas are «linked for ever to the particular
religious sources
from which they historically sprang», also says that the Vedas are a monument of universal religion and therefore of deep significance for all people.
It required them to move
from literal interpretations of the
texts to allegorical interpretations in which the
religious insight of the
texts was uncovered.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual
texts - and so they try to remove themselves
from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized
religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics
from their respective
religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate
from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
Either way, religion has zero answers to those questions, since most
religious texts are
from a time where people thought that our planet was the center of the entire cosmos.
So
from a Whiteheadian perspective, understanding of a
religious text does not rest so heavily upon existential appropriation of its message as the Heideggerians claim.
I don't think he can be considered a Christian just because he agrees with some passages
from the bible - they may have well come
from any other
religious text.
On the matter of self and fulfillment, John Boswell, a Yale historian who has written some of the major
texts employed by homosexual activists, asserts, «Not only is homosexual eroticism the oldest and most persistent strand in the Christian theology of romantic love, but Christian
religious life was the most prominent gay life - style in Western Europe
from the early Middle Ages to the Reformation, about two - thirds of the period since Europe became Christian.»
This anti-Semitism comes
from the holy
texts of Islam and
from the entire Islamic
religious establishment.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off
from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent
from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers»
religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical
text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.
«The importance of studying parallels lies in providing a check against isolating the Hebrew prophet
from his specific historical context as if his
text represented a timeless
religious literature that floated above all historical particularity,» he writes.
To the student who has perhaps come to these writings
from studies in folklore or fairy tales and who is now «disillusioned» by their long - windedness, we might say that no
religious text is easy and entertaining reading.
You can post quotes
from and references to this book all year long and it will not change the fact that: Yes, there are some practical words of wisdom for peaceful human behavior in it (as there are in most
religious texts), but just because this is true it does not make all of the supernatural fantasies in it true.
To many of the jewish faith, the Christians hijacked part of their
religious writings and applied their own interpretations, often own «translations» which in parts are different
from older
texts (that Christianity did not control).
He also makes quite a few arguments
from omission, concluding
from the fact that the
text doesn't explicitly report that Esther «went to synagogue» that she must have been a worldly, lukewarm Jew, forgetting that Esther is the one who calls for a fast later in the story, reflecting something of a
religious background and personal
religious conviction.
The kind of reading we practice approximates what Paul J. Griffiths has called «
religious reading,» as distinct
from «consumerist reading,» which makes us users, buyers and sellers of
texts.
Most of these lectures aim at bringing the insights of Hinduism and Buddhism closer to Indian and Western Christians as well as philosophers, to deepen their understanding of faith and expand it to other forms of belief.43 His anthology «The Vedic Experience» which has been accepted and respected by many Hindus, tries to present
texts from the Veda and the Upanishads in such a way that they become open towards other beliefs and transparent for the depth of faith.44 An important aspect of his literary production, already central at the beginning, but gaining prominence again lately, has been to address a Western public that faces the challenge of having to seek its
religious identity and not being able to take it for granted.
Unity in the oikoumene is a continuous task, as Panikkar well stated in an early
text: «Ecumenism has to start with suffering arising
from diversity; in a further step, it should unveil the deeper, common striving; and it could well culminate in the
religious effort to bring closer this unity of Reality.
In these
texts, King defined the black freedom movement as seeking to redeem the soul of America and to liberate its political and
religious institutions
from the cancer of racism.
When the
text thus interprets its interpreter, it does so not through re-engaging belief in ancient
religious categories but by raising questions about the would - be interpreter's existence — his estrangement
from himself and others, his experienced «fulfillment gap» between what he is and what be could be.
Also useful are faculty seminars that encourage small groups to study a
text from another
religious tradition, or a current social issue, or a current American
religious practice in such a way that transcends specialized fields.
Again, coming
from a
religious studies department at a secular university; if the Bible is not inspired by God, I can't trust it more than any other
religious text (even if it has truth in it).
Anne Rice, as a fantasy writer, should know better than anyone where all
religious texts come
from... the imaginations of the authors.
Jesus responds with a
text from Isaiah that condemns those who comply with
religious forms while «their hearts are far
from me.»
In it he found the great myths of the creation, the fall, the flood, the escape
from Egypt, the promised land, the twelve tribes, the exile, the prophets, all full of Semitic poetry and wisdom, and great human stories, followed by the incomparable
religious texts of the New Testament — «He who would save his life must lose it».
The Bible like any other
religious book whose adherents worship the
text must be brought down
from its idolatrous pillar.
The full
texts of the Council's reports can be read on - line at their web - site
Religious from The Start A recent discovery of carved - ivory artefacts in caves in south - western Germany have served to demonstrate more clearly than ever that early man had an innate spiritual dimension.
Names of your own
religious family members, inspiring people of your faith and names and words pulled
from sacred
texts can help.»
The Scouts have refused to dump
religious words
from their membership pledge, but offered concessions to secular groups by introducing an atheist alternative
text.
In addition to half a dozen important
texts, Kepler wrote hundreds of letters sharing the details of his personal affairs — how he married, mourned the deaths of his children, moved
from place to place to escape
religious persecution.