You don't really care about treatises on whether families are best being customers of schools, or ideological debates over the value of Common Core, or pablum
from school choice activists with jobs to protect about why state tests shouldn't be used to hold accountable private schools taking vouchers for serving kids, or if an Obama Administration plan to address suspensions is somehow a punishment to traditional district schools that have been failing kids for decade after decade.
Not exact matches
Washington Post education reporter Valerie Strauss is not known for an open mind on
school choice, but she would have been wise to do a little homework before reprinting a 1,300 - word oped
from an anti-voucher
activist in Florida.
That for some conservative reformers, most - notably
school choice activists, the fact that they also benefit financially
from their work also makes matters difficult.
Given that the idea comes
from more - rabid
school choice activists such as Evers and Burke (along with University of Arkansas» Jay P. Greene) who want to shield voucher programs
from any accountability, and would get the backing of traditionalists (who oppose testing altogether), eviscerating the testing mandate exposes Kline and House Republicans to charges (
from other conservatives) of hypocrisy and being in bed with unions.
From opposing the expansion of high - quality charter
schools and other
school choice options, to its opposition to Parent Trigger laws and efforts of Parent Power
activists in places such as Connecticut and California, to efforts to eviscerate accountability measures that hold districts and
school operators to heel for serving Black and Brown children well, even to their historic disdain for Black families and condoning of Jim Crow discrimination against Black teachers, both unions have proven no better than outright White Supremacists when it comes to addressing the legacies of bigotry in which American public education is the nexus.
A slew of anti-
school choice activists, including the teachers union, state
school boards association, and the state PTA, filed two separate legal challenges against the state's
school choice laws, alleging that they violate the state constitution's historically anti-Catholic Blaine Amendment, which prohibits public funds
from being expended at religious
schools, and the state's «uniformity» clause.
But given the deeply - held opposition to vouchers
from both education traditionalists and some elements within the
school reform movement itself, voucher supporters and
school choice activists can not simply hope that bad news goes away.