That is, the evidence suggests that both students who exercise choice and students who remain in public schools benefit
from school choice programs.
Data
from school choice programs in Milwaukee, New Orleans, and Ohio show that a school choice plan does not always improve the quality of education for all students.
Those who would directly benefit
from school choice programs overwhelmingly support having the option.
Two recent studies of LSP indicate initial negative student achievement results that do not align with the greater body of research showing positive or neutral outcomes
from school choice programs in other cities and states.
Last week, Mike Petrilli, President of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, published a series of blog posts at the Education Gadfly and Education Next critiquing an AEI study by Dr. Collin Hitt, Dr. Michael McShane, and myself discussing the surprising disconnect between the achievement and attainment effects
from school choice programs in the US.
Not exact matches
In 1990, without solicitation
from the
school, Grover's office sent Messmer the department's application form for admission to the
choice program.
To take a single example, last year I had the privilege of participating in one of these
schools in a small university town, where in a parish of about one thousand members over two hundred persons (including a goodly number of interested «enquirers» who had heard of the
program through a carefully planned advertising campaign) attended eight night sessions, held
from eight until ten o'clock, with a
choice among eight different courses, dealing with theological, ethical, historical, devotional, and scriptural subjects.
Innovative life enrichment and marriage renewal
programs in our churches,
schools, and social agencies can help mid-years persons confront the challenge and the
choices, the pain and the possibilities, and
from this confrontation begins the adventure of new growth.
When you sign up for this
program, 15 % of any purchase you make
from MightyNest in the future goes back to the
school of your
choice (it can be your child's
school or simply a
school that is in your local area).
For this
school year, in a bid to boost participation in its lunch
program from its paying students, the district will now offer them the
choice of two entrees and a self - serve salad bar available on Tuesdays and Thursdays for students in grades three to five.
With community support, we eliminated high - fructose drinks
from school vending machines and banned sweets
from classroom parties (a hard swallow for those drinking the same sugary punch as Cookie Crusader Sarah Palin); changed the tuition - based preschool food offerings to allergy - free, healthful
choices; successfully lobbied for a salad bar and then taught kids how to use it; enlisted Gourmet Gorilla, a small independent company, to provide affordable, healthy, locally sourced, organic snacks after -
school and boxed lunches; built a teaching kitchen to house an afterschool cooking
program; and convinced teachers to give - up a union - mandated planning period in order to supervise daily outdoor recess.
Children across the country are learning how to make better snack and meal
choices in
schools with the help of engaging nutrition education
programs,
from farm - to -
school programs and cooking lessons to student taste parties.
A
school district or charter
school may not delay eligibility or otherwise prevent a student participating in controlled open enrollment, or a
choice program,
from being immediately eligible to participate in interscholastic and intrascholastic extracurricular activities.
Because our
program is different
from many other therapeutic boarding
schools in Hawaii, we encourage parents to really do their research and see whether we are the right
choice for their teenage sons.
President Donald Trump on March 16 took the first step to make good on his campaign promise to shift federal tax dollars
from traditional public
schools to a «
choice»
program that promotes charters, private and religious
schools.
We can never trust Dominika's true motives in sleeping with Nash, which negates her
choice as independent and instead slots it into the «f*ck anyone you must to survive» narrative that hounds her
from the moment her uncle (Matthias Schoenaerts, who looks made up to resemble Vladimir Putin) coerces her into the Sparrow
program, which she dubs «whore
school».
Choices for parents who think their kids might benefit
from a special
program at a
school in a nearby
school district: In California, some
school districts where enrollment was dropping are taking advantage of the state's District of
Choice law, which allows districts to compete for students by offering innovative
programs and options that parents want.
The evidence
from the A-Plus accountability and
choice program suggests that policymakers must also ensure that
schools are provided with the appropriate incentives to use their resources effectively.
The prediction comes
from both proponents and opponents of the tuition - voucher measure, which, by providing parents with $ 900 for each student enrolled in a private or out - of - district public
school, would be the most extensive
choice program yet adopted by any state.
We could find plenty of examples of disconnect
from other policy interventions, such as pre-
school programs, but I am focusing on
school choice because I know this literature best.
Make it easier for states to expand
school choice: As states increasingly adopt
choice - based models, ranging
from Nevada's Education Savings Accounts to Louisiana's «course
choice»
programs, Congress should adapt funding requirements to ensure that federal funds serve the intended beneficiaries without tying states» hands.
Patrick Wolf explained that «private -
school -
choice programs disproportionately attract students
from disadvantaged backgrounds,» noting that the
choice participants are «considerably more likely to be low - income, lower - achieving, and African American, and much less likely to be white, as compared to the average public -
school student in their area.»
Programs that arise
from failing
schools are of unpredictable dimensions and are more tied to the values of «
choice» and «privatization.»
For those interested in private
school choice, two political advantages are claimed: 1) High - regulation addresses some objections, winning votes among skeptics to improve the political prospects of passing and sustaining those
programs; 2) High - regulation protects private
school choice programs from the political damage caused by scandals and embarrassing outcomes.
If you add a cap, say the $ 20 billion figure that President Trump has said he wants to devote to
school choice, then you have to figure out how to allocate the available dollars under that cap to different states, and you have to figure out a way to do it that is predictable
from one year to the next, such that there aren't huge fluctuations that would cause the
programs to ebb and flow dramatically.
Previous gold standard studies had almost unanimously found modest positive effects
from school choice, which raises the obvious question: what makes the Louisiana Scholarship
Program (LSP) so different?
Capping the number of students who can participate in
choice programs has kept
school districts
from suffering any severe drops in enrollment.
The book emerged
from the authors» study of
choice programs in the
schools of San Antonio, but it became an attempt at a sweeping synthesis of scholarly work on education policy, drawing on literature in philosophy, economics, political science, education, and law.
Even if government accountability is not the norm for government
programs, some people may still favor requiring
choice schools to take the state test and comply with other components of the high - regulation approach to
school choice, such as mandating that
schools accept voucher amounts as payment in full, prohibiting
schools from applying their own admissions requirements, and focusing
programs on low - income students in low - performing
schools.
And they want a powerful regulator — a portfolio manager or harbor master — who will identify and remove bad
schools from choice programs.
Also, instructional per - pupil spending has increased in all affected public
school districts, contradicting the belief that
school choice programs take money away
from public
school students, the report says.
We've gone
from two, century - old voucher
programs in Maine and Vermont to having private
school choice in more than half of the states.
And Tuesday's interminable «expose» of state - level tax - credit scholarship
programs certainly deepens one's impression that the writer (and, presumably, her editors) is in love with anything that smacks of «public dollars» or «public
schools» and at war with anything that might be seen as diverting even a penny
from state coffers into the hands of parents to educate their kids at
schools of their
choice.
Critics of ESAs and other
school choice efforts like to allege that the
programs will «siphon» resources
from public
schools or harm students in some way.
The report
from which this paper is drawn is part of the comprehensive evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental
Choice Program being conducted by the
School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas.
And the beauty of expanding
school choice is that it generates its own advocates as families that benefit
from these
programs lobby to protect and expand their
choices.We are almost at the point where ed reform organizations don't have to do very much other than to coordinate
choice families pushing for more
choices.
We need to learn
from the contagious successes of outstanding public
schools and
choice programs like the Amistad Academy in Connecticut, the Green Dot
schools in California, and the voluntary interdistrict transfer
program in St. Louis.
Louisiana has launched a Course
Choice program that allows students to take online courses for high
school credit
from approved providers, including nonprofits, for - profits, associations, and colleges.
The most generous judicial interpretation of the voucher question could at most require that states not exclude religious
schools from choice programs that are open to other private
schools.
The results reported here are consistent with four similar studies - the 1973 High
School Seniors Cohort Study, the National Educational Longitudinal Study, the Latino National Political Survey, and data collected from participants in school - choice programs in Washington, D.C., and Dayton,
School Seniors Cohort Study, the National Educational Longitudinal Study, the Latino National Political Survey, and data collected
from participants in
school - choice programs in Washington, D.C., and Dayton,
school -
choice programs in Washington, D.C., and Dayton, Ohio.
Another mother
from Pennsylvania wrote to EdChoice looking for information on
school choice programs because her son faced «relentless bullying» and had recently received «a threat
from another student to harm him.»
[7] Certainly it is a departure
from existing
school choice programs.
But the goal of most state private
school choice programs is to draw children
from less affluent families into good quality, tuition based private
schools.
The 529 expansion is a marked departure
from targeted private
school choice programs in two ways.
But as we've learned
from roughly a quarter - century of experience with state - level
school choice programs and federal higher education policy, any connection to the federal government can have unintended consequences for
choice, including incentivizing government control of the
schools to which public money flows.
Louisiana appears on track to enact a private -
school - voucher plan for New Orleans that borrows
from choice programs elsewhere in several respects,
from its focus on a single city and its means - testing of families to its targeting of students enrolled in low - performing public
schools.
Multiple evaluations, by organizations ranging
from the Manhattan Institute to the Urban League, have found the
choice programs to have had a positive impact on Florida public
schools.
Parents, educators, and taxpayers surveyed by the Public Policy Forum in Milwaukee cited a range of guidelines,
from reporting test scores and teacher qualifications to oversight by an independent board, they believe are necessary to oversee
choice programs involving private
schools.
This approach is good for kids — protecting them
from bad
schools — and it's also good politics — safeguarding
choice programs from criticisms about weak performance and shoddy quality.
After studying six years of data
from Milwaukee, Warren concludes, in a new study reported here, «Students in the Milwaukee
choice program are more likely to graduate
from high
school than» students in the Milwaukee Public
Schools (MPS).