Sentences with phrase «from seeing the other side»

Not exact matches

To test your idea, look at other businesses in your industry to see if your side hustle is better than or different from what's already being done.

But Simon notes that the quickest way toward finding common ground is to try and see the situation from the other side.

The device also has a 120 - degree wide - angle HD camera built in, so you can see what's happening at home at the office, from across town, or on the other side of the world.

They wanted contributions from «the other side» too (see Simon Wren - Lewis's article too).

On the other side of the border, where even Hillary Clinton wasn't planning a national price on carbon, we expect to see one from Donald Trump precisely never.

• The War was distracting CEOs from hiring and spending; • Consumer confidence was negatively impacted; • Victory increases the chance a tax cut passes; • War limited visibility, keeping earnings expectations low; • The markets initial rally was «looking through» the war — and seeing an economic recovery on the other side.

The other side of the coin is to understand Buyer Perceived Risks (BPR) © and to understand how buyers see the degrees of consequences that can result from a bad choice.

See my ebook on Amazon / Kindle «Visitations from the Other Side.»

When you see a room from the other side and know it before you've seen it then you know what sanity is and where your love abides

As Jesse Jackson observed in an unguarded moment, if you see five young white males coming from a Bible class on one side of the street and five young black males hanging out on the other side, you have no trouble in knowing which side of the street you want to be on.

It's easy for someone in the majority to make these claims of calmness and peace but that is not what us atheists see coming from the other side either.

If you think there are some «compelling reasons» to change your views, then why wouldn't you share them here, and others can see them and either change as well or possibly present «compelling» reasons from the other side?

Any one, therefore, holding a religious rather than a materialistic philosophy, will think of the process of Biblical development as dual — seen from one side, a human achievement; seen from the other, a divine self - revelation.

If so, we are guilty of an impiety and will live to see the transfer of exegetical wealth from our side to the other.

Scientist are also approaching it from the other side too, gradually stripping away at prokaryotic cells to see how stripped down they have to become for life to «stop,» while others continue to build up from coacervates and protobionts.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

We can see others not as foes and enemies, but as people who are on the other side of the galaxy from where we are at.

And this is why the issue will never go away — because people like George want to equate abortion with ra.pe — some people will obviously never see the argument from the other side and thus will not compromise.

ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?

Hi Paul, I come from the other side, but agree with your comments... rare to see a rational statement in the comment section

We'll all be watching from the sidelines, splitting our sides laughing as the Baptists vs. the Catholics vs. the Methodists vs. the Mormons vs. the Charismatics vs. the Muslims vs. the Lutherans times 50 + other denominations all fight to see whose fantasy and superst.itions will rule the place.

By the way, see my eBook on Amazon / Kindle, «Visitations from the Other Side.»

Yes Gary; Jesus is in you as your savour as He is the savour of the world: In Adam all die even so in Christ is All made alive: But I have seen in the past couple days your words and they are not my Lords at all: Christ is not divided or Bi-Polar: He does not cuss like a sailor one day and then minister to the masses the next: No; Christ is consistent, He is Grounded in His word; those that waver are not stable in anything, even as is written: I truly know now the you truly do have a mocking spirit in you, because again Christ is not Bi-polar: Go re-read you other post and see if they are the words of my Lord, then ask if anyone will be willing to follow you even as you are of Christ: The false Christ comes up along side of the truth Christ to pervert everything that is of God: That is how all these sects are again formed, many started of in the truth, but went out from the Word of our Lord even through Paul now to become their own god: You are now an example of what I speak: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

I expected that some people would not understand or would disagree with my argument, but I did not expect the warm and genuinely excited reactions from those whose own experience has led them to see Christ on the other side of the long border between contemporary Catholic and evangelical religious experiences.

One's emotions, such as unwillingness to be wrong, the comfort of old beliefs, the fear of stepping out from the familiar into the unknown, keep Christians and Athiests alike from seeing what might be true in the other side's beliefs, or what might be false in their own.

On one side you have Tolstoi saying, «Where love is, there God is also»; and on the other side is Joseph Wood Krutch, one of the finest nontheistic humanists of our time, who, seeing in goodness no revelation of the Eternal, says about man, «There is no reason to suppose that his own life has any more meaning than the life of the humblest insect that crawls from one annihilation to another.»

And I can see my kids drooling over it from the other side of the room.

«If I'm controlling everything from one side to the other, customers could see our suppliers at any time and we remain totally transparent and traceable.»

You can see other healthy recipes over on Food Fanatic by clicking here or browse side dish recipes from my fellow contributors by clicking here.

the other problem i often see is in our last 2 games, when someone create attack from wing / wide side and then passing the ball to mid he rarely watching other player position player before passing (like ox) so its just waste & only 1or 2 player who's hard tryin to get the ball, when arrived to mid like sanchez / giroud, the other i think are just watching and waiting (if lucky) the ball come near him.

On the other hand, I did think that Ozil played better today than the previous few times I've seen him — he made some comment mid-week to the effect that he's there to provide the artistic side of the game and not to do battle, so maybe that's all we can expect from him.

Then they can either slip a running back out to the flat to that side or have someone run a crossing route from the other side that ends up in that flat to see if Philly has fixed that issue.

but its a bit sad to see that i as i know more about arsenal fans than other fans, to say from the bottom of my heart, that the fans on here are as worse as the worst if not the worst fans out there... arsenal being on a run, with özil scoring one of the best goals i have ever seen on tuesday, draws against the best defensive side in the league and no they arent stoke city or something they are SPURS equally title challenger as any of arsenal man city, man united, chelsea, liverpool, a team that sent man city home when they (city) looked unbeatable..

Ronald Koeman did well to keep hold of the strong tackling midfielder last summer, having seen a host of other talents leave St Mary's, but his side's recent wobble may be indicative of the club's likely fall from the top four picture.

First dunk, he points left, so I move to the other side of the basket, from where I can see his face.

But perhaps the most direct and true way is to see and smell and feel it through one person — one girl who ran both from it and straight at it; one girl sucked into its eye and then set down on its other side; one girl, now a woman, who has had time to sort out what it did to her life.

He is the safety from the other side who came over after he saw the other guy get beat.

Goals from Jack Wilshere, Martín Demichelis and one each by Alexis Sánchez and Sergio Agüero saw the two sides match each other blow for blow.

The full - back has done enough to earn the attention of United, but Louis van Gaal's side may have to see off competition from other Premier League sides if they want to secure their man.

Carlo Ancelotti's apparent preference to play Sergio Ramos and Pepe at centre - back has seen the talented Frenchman's performances limited to 20 starts in La Liga this season, with another five games coming from the bench, largely due to the other two spending time out of the side injured.

Just because you get a thumb down or someone doesn't agree with you, or perhaps even calls you an idiot or retard (both not nice, but see my post above from the other side of the fence) we shouldn't take notice of it.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There is also of course the link with his agent Mino Raiola, who represents Pogba, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and others, and so perhaps there is a strong chance of seeing him being prised away from Juventus with the Daily Star adding he has already been offered to the Premier League side.

On the other side of things, we are seeing the public push both the Packers and 49ers lines moving from even to -3 and -1.5 -3 respectively.

From one internet rando to another: I sincerely hope you choose to see the other side of «seeing the other side.»

with the way chelsea play expect alot of those side passes trying to build up before us losing the ball and yes them counter attacking in the speed of light especially when bellerin and saed are bombing forward and the pass gets intercepted and they have to run from one end of the field to the other i have seen it to many times!!

By utilizing our public betting data from seven contributing sportsbooks, we're able to see which teams the public is loading up on and then take the other side.

I'm really disappointed to see that some Arsenal fans display the arrogance that I would normally expect from the other north London side (who I hate with a passion!).

Arsene Wenger appears keen to see off interest from other prospective suitors with his north London side to hold talks with Palermo's president Maurizio Zamparini in London this week in a bid to «thrash out» a deal to sign the # 29.5 m rated South American.