Sentences with phrase «from simple physics»

BH: Some of them are talking about climate sensitivity at 1.2 C, at 1.5 C. I think this is completely implausible because the basic energetics of the climate system responding to the additional greenhouse gas emissions almost from simple physics, has to be at least 1.2 C and possibly more before you begin to take into account any of the feedbacks in the system from water vapour in clouds and so on.

In many cases this is true, but some results (like lapse rate) derive from simple physics built into the models (this doesn't mean it's correct, but means the implications are greater if it is wrong).

Speaking about puzzles, the team got pretty creative with Obduction's puzzles, including a nice variety ranging from simple physics based puzzles to others that take advantage of unique mechanics such as teleportation.

Not exact matches

random is a mathematically sound idea where as god is a simple creation of some MAN from long ago to explain the unexplainable of the day... chaos theory is quantum physics 101 and is also based solely on the notion of random events... not to mention quantum uncertainty which is one of my favorites.

The «assumption of simple location,» upon which classical physics was based, abstracts from an aspect of physical reality that must now be considered fundamental and not just accidental — time.

In the language of physics, the simplest «physical feelings» are units of energy transference; or, rather, the physicist's idea that energy is transmitted according to quantum conditions is an abstraction from the concrete facts of the universe, which are individual occasions of experience connected by their «physical feelings.»

Perhaps he thought that his early graphs for physics did supply the structural design for elementary cases, and that his new humanistic vocabulary in Process and Reality indicated a transferability from the simpler cases to more complex ones.

Ms. Frizzle from The Magic School Bus make understanding physics simple.

But using that argument to deduce the Fermi bubbles» age is more circumstantial, Finkbeiner says, whereas the new estimate comes from dividing the distance by the speed to get the time, something so simple a high school physics student can do it.

«There's nothing simpler in basketball, because you can take all the time you want to make it, and there's nobody waving their arms in front of you trying to block you,» says Peter Brancazio, a physics professor emeritus from Brooklyn College and author of SportsScience: Physical Laws and Optimum Performance.

Using historical data from horizontal wells in the Barnett Shale formation in North Texas, Tad Patzek, professor and chair in the Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering in the Cockrell School of Engineering; Michael Marder, professor of physics in the College of Natural Sciences; and Frank Male, a graduate student in physics, used a simple physics theory to model the rate at which production from the wells declines over time, known as the «decline curve.»

Roman Morgunov from the Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics at the Russian Academy of Sciences and colleagues have now developed a simple additive - based method for ensuring the stability of permanent magnets over time, with no loss to their main magnetic characteristics.

Now, oddly, a pair of physicists has found that the same formula emerges from a routine calculation in the physics of the hydrogen atom — the simplest atom there is.

Now, scientists from the research group of Nir Bar - Gill at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Racah Institute of Physics and Department of Applied Physics, in cooperation with Prof. Eyal Buks of the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, have shown that ultra-high densities of NV centers can be obtained by a simple process of using electron beams to kick carbon atoms out of the lattice.

«There's nothing simpler in basketball, because you can take all the time you want to make it, and there's nobody waving his arms in front of you trying to block you,» says Peter Brancazio, a physics professor emeritus from Brooklyn College and author of SportsScience: Physical Laws and Optimum Performance.

Described this week in the journal Applied Physics Letters, from AIP Publishing, the technology is based on an electronic device known as a coplanar capacitor and detects goose bumps by virtue of a simple, linear relation between the deformation of the sensor and the decrease of the capacitance.

As a whole, now the conceptual transition occurs from proving the inflationary paradigm in general and testing some of its simplest models to applying it for investigation of particle physics at super-high energies and of the actual history of the Universe in the remote past using observational data.

This study, Hot oxygen escape from Mars: Simple scaling with solar EUV irradiance was recently published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

You've got the radiative physics, the measurements of ocean temperature and land temperature, the changes in ocean heat content (Hint — upwards, whereas if if was just a matter of circulation moving heat around you might expect something more simple) and of course observed predictions such as stratospheric cooling which you don't get when warming occurs from oceanic circulation.

Our son was born there and Liam's dad is from Barnsley so I was really pleased Liam chose to buy my ring there as I love sentimental things like this.Liam has a simple cobalt band, he is a physics teacher so he has to wear something hard wearing as he's always coming home having burnt his tie or some such accident so his ring is bound to be in danger at some point!

Its crazy physics, simple controls, stylish look, and cleverly - designed levels are all big reasons why we really dug Badland in our review from back in April.

Questions around the «failed» Apollo 13 mission that cover topics ranging from simple harmonic motion to gravitation to thermal physics and gas laws.

At the 3DO Company in the early and mid 90s, he was very involved in the generational video game transition from games built on simple algorithms with 2D sprite graphics to games with real - time 3D photorealistic graphics and physics engines.

Part of the handling about - face can be attributed to chassis surgery — everything from front spring and damper tuning (softer) to engine mount calibration (stiffer) was tweaked to accommodate the manual gearbox's lighter weight — but most of it is simple physics.

Yes, the situation would be very simple if a car were an ideal solid block from a physics textbook (i.e. a spherical chicken).

Now available for digital download on PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and PC, the platformer focuses on the use of physics to solve puzzles ranging from fairly simple to brain - wrackingly challenging.

simple water physics, which simulate pressure, waves, water flowing from room to another and drag + buoyancy exerted on the game objects (like characters and items)

The abundance of settings allows you to customize a level of car physics realism, from arcade and simple to the most realistic, as in the difficult racing simulator in which you will need to show your driving skills.

-- Online and offline multiplayer game — Simple and fun gameplay — Amazing ball physics — Online tournaments against players from all over the world — Play against your friends — Collect different teams and cups

Hill Racing PvP is the most addictive physics based driving game, you can control your vehicle to climb to face the challenges of unique environments.Online real - time multiplayer game, Play with your friends or get matched with random players from around the world with Google Play.Features: - Simple and smooth...

Oh yeah, you're bristling right now, indignantly clutching that 6.75 - inch Commander Shepard action figure and preparing to unleash interstellar hell on that comments section, but the simple fact is that no matter how many times I admire the unlikely physics of Jack's belt - bra, my memories of immorally wresting Ferelden from the clutches of the darkspawn are that much fonder.

There is still a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the issue of TSI reconstruction, though progress is more likely to come from a better understanding of the physics of the solar cycles than from simple, hard - to - verify assumptions.

Of course, the physics of climate is far more complex than the simple gravitational interaction of two bodies, so our climate predictions are far less sure than locating the position of Neptune 100 years from now.

Ray's answer makes it obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and far from being explainable by simple, hand - made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.

The weakening of the Walker circulation arises in these models from processes that are fundamentally different from those of El Nià ± o — and is present in both mixed - layer and full - ocean coupled models, so is not dependent on the models» ability to represent Kelvin waves (by the way, most of the IPCC - AR4 models have sufficient oceanic resolution to represent Kelvin waves and the physics behind them is quite simple — so of all the model deficiencies to focus on this one seems a little odd).

and there's a lot of basic physics that stem from simple principles (e.g., precipitation is more depleted than the water from which it evaporated, the high latitudes are more depleted than lower latitudes, etc).

That model is, after all, ultimately derived from fairly simple physics and directly measured data.

Was 0.75 C / Wm ^ -2 originally derived from first principle climate physics, or was it built in by a simple division of (total K) / (total forcing)?

Yet the simple radiative physics of the atmosphere are obvious to all but eccentric monomaniacs as we increase anthropogenic emissions from 4 % to 8 %, 16 %, 32 % of natural emissions as economies grow this century.

«A principle that unites every kind of complexity theorist, and they are a richly varied class (see § 3 and § 5, below), is that observable «reality» pertaining to any field, physics, biology, chemistry, applied mathematics, economics, etc., is complex but this complexity emanates from simple building blocks — of concepts, methods and rules of interaction.

If you read through the various posts, and also the responses from others (some) to those posts, it will become apparent that many (too many) of the posters here, are either trolls deliberately trying to muddy the water, or their understanding of the English language is as dismal as their understanding of some simple physics.

Far - from - equilibrium behavior is not a simple extension of equilibrium or near - equilibrium physics.

Originally posted on... and Then There's Physics: Okay, I finally succumbed and actually waded through some of the new paper by Monckton, Soon, Legates & Briggs called Why models run hot: results from an irreducibly simple climate model.

I think the reason «atmospheric scientists», I'm putting this in quotation marks because I think this refers to «climate scientists» whose basic physics I dispute, are resisting this is really quite simple, it includes condensation and as I've gone to some effort to explain, the Water Cycle is missing from the energy budgets and I give the following as examples of their narrative:

It is not clear whether you are intellectually challenged or are suffering from confirmation bias and refuse to accept the simple physics which explains how GHG warming works.

Perhaps this is the source of Dyson's dreadful misjudgment on the climate question: he sees that the possible errors are large, but does not factor in that they are likely to be large in the wrong direction, and does not credit obvious qualitative arguments from simple laws of physics.»

«We've seen, from the tutorial we've been examining [https://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/hafemeister.cfm], that the physics of climate change, regardless of how sound each step in the process might seem, is far too complex to satisfy Occam's Razor — we have no way of knowing whether a simpler explanation might account equally well or better for the known physical interactions.

Tom Murphy from «Do The Math» blog has a great little video titled «Growth Has An Expiration Date» the math and the basic physics behind it are really simple, it doesn't take a PhD in advanced mathematics or physics to understand it.