It is under fire
from some environmentalists because of its relatively lax targets and low carbon prices, along with its vulnerability to fraud and abuse.
Not exact matches
Labor unions have pushed for approval of the pipeline, saying it would create thousands of construction jobs, while
environmentalists opposed it
because it would increase greenhouse gas emissions
from Canada's oil sands.
Environmentalists and health workers in favor of the CPP will emphasize how the plan would lead to billions of dollars in savings on hospital bills
because it also would slash emissions
from coal plants.
Many scientists and
environmentalists warn that the government's present strategy of simply storing the plutonium could do more harm than good
because it does nothing to reduce the risk of environmental disaster, and, rather than discourage other countries
from developing nuclear weapons, it could provoke them to increase their efforts.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences
from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
Generally speaking,
environmentalists support the idea of putting a price on carbon
because it would help account for the harmful effects of carbon emissions on the climate and encourage the economy to shift away
from fossil fuels.
«Wood pellets are considered carbon neutral
because as forests grow they can retrap carbon, but the designation has drawn criticism
from environmentalist and academics who have questioned the equation.
The draft CES came in for withering criticism
from the solar industry,
environmentalists, and renewable power experts
because it called for capping the kind of solar power known as distributed or behind - the - meter generation — that's what people and businesses put on their roofs — at about 20 megawatts a year.
I hear many
environmentalists arguing that renewables are good economically apart
from the environmental benefits
because the energy is «free».
Now some scientists and
environmentalists are crying foul
because its centerpiece is an article that looks like — but is not — a reprint
from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Despite opposition
from residents and
environmentalists, including the Chair of the local Council and the Scottish Wildlife Trust, it was approved
because the First Minister of Scotland said «In tough economic times, substantial investment of this kind is at a premium.»
The main reason I distrust the «science» is
because it comes mostly
from the UN, and the
environmentalist loony left.