Sadly, results
from standardized test most often tell us more about the family and community economics in which a student lives than how much a student knows or can do.
Not exact matches
It's unknown whether the retreat
from the
most controversial effects of the Common Core standards will quell a boycott movement that led to one fifth of students skipping the third through eighth grade
standardized tests earlier this year.
Haney and others have concluded that this policy change artificially drove up 4th - grade
test scores, because it removed
from the cohort of students
tested those who were retained in 3rd grade, the very students
most likely to score the lowest on
standardized tests.
For the city, Hansen says, the moral of the story was that
most parents don't want to move their children
from their neighborhood school, no matter how miserable its scores on
standardized tests.
On
most measures of student performance, student growth is typically about 1 full standard deviation on
standardized tests between 4th and 8th grade, or about 25 percent of a standard deviation
from one grade to the next.
This partially reflects the fact that
most states had accepted the ideas that schools should be held responsible for student performance and that results
from standardized tests should play a large role in determining consequences (to view the consequences for schools failing to make adequate yearly progress, see Figure 2).
WASHINGTON — In the
most comprehensive study of its kind yet conducted, researchers
from Boston College have found evidence to confirm the widespread view that
standardized and textbook
tests emphasize low - level thinking and knowledge and that they exert a profound, mostly negative, effect on classroom instruction.
In contrast to
standardized assessment items, the assignments and
tests that
most teachers create and then use in their classrooms are often far
from being valid or reliable.
Standardized tests are, by definition,
tests removed
from student engagement and context; they require a particular kind of teaching that is antithetical to what
most of us believe education should be.
The author calls for a debate on
standardized tests led by education leaders instead of politicians and the
testing, tutoring, and textbook industries that benefit the
most from testing.
Perhaps one of
most widely publicized examples of school boards acting courageously to push back on some of these regressive policies comes
from Texas where 520 boards of education and their superintendents fought the implementation of 15 end - of - course high school
standardized tests that were part of a state education reform package.
Oregon doesn't provide statewide statistics on charter school performance, and many of the schools are too new for their
standardized tests scores to show up in the 02 - 03 data, the
most recent available
from the state Education Department.
The
most controversial of them include what is known as value - added models1 that use data
from standardized tests of students as part of the overall measure of the effect that a teacher has on student achievement.
A nuance
from the Chicago study, however, emphasizes the importance of grades in comparison to
standardized test scores — a reverse of how
most lawmakers and public policy experts have traditionally weighted the two indicators.
Despite promises
from achievement school district backers that some of Tennessee's
most troubled schools would be vaulted into the top 25 percent of schools statewide,
standardized testing scores have shown no «statistically significant» difference in the district's schools, according to Henry's research.
Conditional acceptance policies and programs, however, must include supports for remediation and receive approval
from RIDE.104 Rhode Island takes these requirements further than
most states, joining only Delaware in articulating clear state policy that requires higher GPA and
standardized test scores outright.105
Anderson Elementary — a school in Reno, Nevada, that had slipped
from status as a high - achieving school to one in which
most students failed
standardized tests — turned itself around in three years through focusing intensely on literacy and teacher collaboration.
Classroom surveys show
most teachers do not find scores
from standardized tests scores very useful.
Most importantly, Dr. Darling - Hammond states that evaluation should include evidence of student learning but
from sources other than
standardized tests, and she rejects growth measures such as SGPs and Value - Added Models because of the ever increasing research base that says they are unreliable and create poor incentives in education.
Essays, speeches and interviews... come
from students, parents and government officials, providing a comprehensive guide to the pitfalls of
standardized testing, with arguments to win over even the
most skeptical school reformer.
Meanwhile, compared to high - poverty districts, few, if any, Commonwealth charter schools enroll the same percentage of children
from low - income families, children with special needs, or children learning English as a second language — the very students who struggle
most with
standardized MCAS
tests.
Prodded by the Education Department,
most states have set up evaluation systems for teachers built on the gains of their students on
standardized tests, alongside more traditional criteria like evaluations
from principals.»
The nuance
from the Chicago study, however, was that it emphasized the importance of grades and attendance in comparison to
standardized test scores — a reverse of how
most lawmakers, public policy experts and parents have traditionally weighted the three indicators.
I don't know what teachers she is observing, but the teachers I see in the schools today are the best and brightest I've ever seen — and are doing heroic work in spite of the
most difficult conditions we've ever faced as a profession: meager resources; dwindling budgetary support; a narrowing of the curriculum leading to cuts to music, art and PE; withering attacks
from Rhee, Kopp, Gates and Duncan and friends; an obsession with
standardized testing; and much more.
And if teachers are undermining accountability they must be doing a pretty poor job of it — we live in a time of unbelievable obsession with
standardized testing, and teacher evaluation systems based on
test scores of subjects that
most teachers don't even teach — and
from students they don't even know.
The need for benchmarking exists because
testing methods employed by researchers in the solar - fuels research field are far
from standardized (different light sources, electrolyte solutions, pH ranges, etc.), making it difficult to cross-compare the performance of different materials, and more difficult still to determine which materials are truly the
most promising.