Sentences with phrase «from taking them to court»

Liability insurance pays for injuries to people who were hurt on or by your property, but the limits of your homeowners liability coverage might fall short of preventing someone from taking you to court and suing your net worth.

Not exact matches

A mandatory arbitration clause in her 11 - year - old employment contract prevented her from taking the matter to court, but her legal team circumvented the matter by suing Ailes personally.

Serena Williams may be taking a break from the court to focus on family, but by no means is she slowing down when it comes to expanding her brand beyond the realm of tennis.

One reason, says Eisinger, is that court rulings have taken away tactics that prosecutors had used to pressure defendants, such as restricting attorney - client privilege and preventing their companies from bankrolling sky - high legal bills.

The law, known as Senate Bill 4, is slated to take effect Sept. 1, but has been challenged in court by rights organizations and localities that say the law infringes on local governments» constitutional rights, and will sow fear through immigrant communities by dissuading people from reporting crimes or testifying as witnesses out of fear they will be deported.

What's more, some states are taking a cue from federal courts and expanding their own sex discrimination laws to cover orientation and identity.

The company fired him last year and has accused him, in federal court in Manhattan, of taking money from Retrophin's coffers to pay back investors in MSMB Capital.

«It is also clear that the government has made the considered decision that it is better off securing such crypto - legislative authority from the courts [than] taking the chance that open legislative debate might produce a result less to its liking.»

When the Toronto Real Estate Board barred him from posting on the MLS, Dale — also a lawyer — took it to court and, three years later, won.

This approach is vastly superior to a Supreme Court ruling that took the decision about the physical presence rule away from Congress.

By July 2014, Carter switched from taking Prozac to Celexa for her anxiety and, according to a court psychiatrist, also shifted in her communications with Roy.

A letter obtained by the Canadian Press from a lawyer representing the Great White North Franchise Association to Tim Hortons parent company Restaurant Brands Inc. said if RBI refuses to meet with franchisees by Friday to discuss «deficient IT practices» and «future IT protocols» they will take the matter to court.

The White House has taken the side of traditional retailers in a Supreme Court case concerning the ability of state and local governments to collect sales taxes from online retailers.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a startup Internet company has to pay broadcasters when it takes television programs from the airwaves and allows subscribers to watch them on smartphones and other portable devices.

Macy's found out about the affair in the worst possible way (a phone call from Stewart), and took both parties to court.

As it turned out, 18 minutes of sworn testimony from Redstone, presented in court Friday, was all it took to resolve the case — but not in Herzer's favor.

Their presidential election — which opposed Norbert Hofer of the Austrian Freedom Party to Alexander van der Bellen from the Greens and was only very narrowly won by van der Bellen — was declared invalid by the Austrian Constitutional Court and will have to take place a second time.

This is a predicament seven years in the making, since Republicans started swearing to repeal Obamacare as soon as they took control of the government, and it is one that the GOP has courted from the start of this year's repeal effort.

Others, including some gun control and mental health advocates, point to the increasing number of states that allow law enforcement officers or, in some cases, family members or others to petition a court to temporarily take guns from people who pose a danger to themselves or others.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page, in his last week on the job, is taking the government to court in a bid to have Ottawa release information about the impacts on federal jobs and services from $ 5.2 billion in cuts announced in last year's budget.Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press / Files

The Financial Planning Coalition — comprising the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, the Financial Planning Association and the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors — filed an amicus brief Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in support of DOL's fiduciary rule and opposing efforts to stop the rule from taking effect.

The couple encountered trouble in August 2009, when Mrs. Healey had to take a medical leave from work and their income dropped by 25 percent, court papers state.

You might even be sued by a debt collector and face a court order to garnish part of your wages — this means that money will be taken directly from your paycheck in order to satisfy your debt.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

They empowered the courts to take guns from people who pose a potential risk.

The lawsuit, filed the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York this week, is fifth legal action taken in an attempt to get relief from the tariffs, though it is the first known action to be filed within the United States itself.

Though there's no comprehensive data that show how often schools are taking graduates to court, defaults grew by 20 % from 2006 to 2011, up to $ 964 million.

If the GOP would quit trying to take away women's rights (as confirmed by the Supreme Court) and concentrate on FREEDOM for all, the party would gain more votes from women than they would lose from evangelicals who must have other concerns that are just as important as taking away a woman's right to chose.

With scant grounding in constitutional text or tradition, court majorities took it upon themselves (usually over strong dissents) to remove a number of matters from legislative and local control.

They continue: «In the short period of our involvement, our highly experienced Standing Counsel Paul Diamond took the case from the High Court to the Court of Appeal, to the Supreme Court, and to the European Court — and then back again to the High Court and to the Court of Appeal.

«The parents have to take responsibility for this child - apart from one case I have not seen any father or mother in court,» he said.»

The Supreme Court has taken his Bible away from the schools and forbidden little children to pray.»

People also take their opinions to social media to debate everything from Supreme Court decisions on abortion to #Brexit and much, much more.

It reminds us that our most pressing constitutional questions (on slavery and secession) were settled out of court; that it took more than a wiser judge to reverse our most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed philosopher - king but a self - taught lawyer from Kentucky by way of Illinois.

Here, from an interview with MTV, is the take on Imus from Snoop Dogg, the day before he pleaded no contest to felony weapons and drug charges in a Los Angeles court:

In sum, the Court has fashioned, in Romer v. Evans, a powerful new instrument for blocking from the academy and the professions people who are «overly serious» about their religion» which is to say, people who take seriously the traditional moral teachings of Christianity and Judaism.

God is not a judge seated apart from man and assigning blame and penalty, like a court judge, who when he has sent a convicted offender to prison goes peacefully home and takes his ease there.

On the morning of that day [April 9] between five and six o'clock the prisoners, among them Admiral Canaris, General Oster, General Thomas and Reichgerichtsrat Sack were taken from their cells, and the verdicts of the court martial read out to them.

Bork's conclusion is nothing if not straightforward: «Unless it takes its law from the original understanding of the Constitution's principles, the Court will continue to be an adversary to democratic government and to the morality of our traditional culture.»

You can go to the Freedom From Religion Foundation website and take a bible quiz, a church state quiz, see what's going on in the court cases against the religious.

The court also heard that the child, who was taken from her mother after police became concerned for her welfare, could still be taken to her grandmother's country of origin if a permanent order was made to grant her care of the girl.

Without taking anything away from the Court's uphill and important effort to bring federal and state authority into better....

We have atheists hanging banners in Times Square, taken prayer out of school, out of the Military, out of gov.. We have seen the 10 Commandments removed from these same places, We have see a simple desert cross taken down and not allowed to be put back up and once the battle had finally been won in courts the O admin would not erect it back.

My home is not thirty minutes away from Dover Area High School and even closer to the Federal District Court in Harrisburg where the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial took place in the fall of 2005.

Planned Parenthood had sued to stop the law from taking effect, and said that they once again plan to appeal — this time to the Supreme Court...

I'm an American and our country was founded on keeping religion separate from state and though I think its taken to extremes, I can understand not hanging crosses in schools or courts or government buildings here.

Had the deceased lady (when she still live) presented to court some circ - u-ms-ta-n-ces and evidence substa - ntial enough to convince the honourable court to take away such right from the heirs, the former could strip such rights from the from the latter and the last will would be deemed legal.

Sure, you can say that, and then get taken to court for stealing work from a hard working citizen you happen to disagree with.

The courts have generally taken a dim view of those who respond to anti-descrimination laws by removing rights from everyone.

Luther was summoned to take his place, and wrote to Katie from Weimar, at the Elector's court, where Melancthon lay seriously ill, an euphoric letter.