Sentences with phrase «from the justice court»

Two weeks after a Southold Town court clerk was charged with stealing more than $ 50,000 in bail money over several years from the justice court's funds, town and state authorities say liability for any stolen funds falls on the elected justices who run the courts.

You might also be able to obtain forms directly from the justice court in which you are filing your case.

You might also be able to obtain information directly from the justice court in which you are filing your case.

If you'd like to try to appeal a conviction, file a Notice of Appeal from Justice Court (Rev. 2016) with the UT justice court handling your case.

In order to receive this benefit, however, you must first receive permission from the Justice Court PCT2 - Burleson County Burleson court handling your violation when you call in or appear in court.

Not exact matches

In trying to recover Snowden's unencrypted mail from the company, which did not keep Snowden's cryptographic key, the Justice Department got a court order forcing the company to turn over another key instead, one that would allow officials to impersonate the company's website and intercept all interactions with its users.

The text also suggested that any dispute settlement arising from the future U.K. - EU relationship should be overseen by the European Court of Justice.

«Thus, in a preliminary analysis, the chief justice... suspended what he saw as an act apparently little reasonable and proportionate, which, in addition to generating legal uncertainty, would leave millions of Brazilians without this communication tool,» a statement from the supreme court read.

The Justice Department revealed in a cryptic court filing that it had successfully unlocked the iPhone with help from an unidentified third - party.

The Justice Department urged the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond to lift a stay imposed by a Maryland federal judge March 16th blocking the administration from carrying out the executive order.

At a hearing on Thursday in state court in Manhattan, New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club Colleccourt in Manhattan, New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club CollecCourt Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club Collection.

From 2006 to 2009, after the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and before the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Ginsburg was the lone woman on the court, a situation she found isolating and disturbing, as she told The New York Times.

Also cited on the DOJ's explanation of the statute is a decision from former Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft, who wrote, «To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money.»

The agency said the clauses prevent consumers who have been wronged from receiving justice and compensation through the courts.

It requires states and local governments with a history of racial and ethnic discrimination, mainly in the South, to get advance approval either from the Justice Department or the federal court in Washington before making any changes that affect elections.

The episode is one detail in the long and colourful story of Justice Sotomayor's rise from an impoverished neighbourhood in the Bronx to becoming America's first Hispanic Supreme Court jJustice Sotomayor's rise from an impoverished neighbourhood in the Bronx to becoming America's first Hispanic Supreme Court justicejustice.

That's because Penraat «has been profiteering from a rent - controlled apartment partially subsidized by another government program,» wrote Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead in her injunction.

In a recent court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijcourt case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijCourt of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.

U.S. President Donald Trump will replace his executive order suspending travel from seven Muslim - majority countries «in the near future,» according to a Justice Department court filing on Thursday.

Korean leaders to meet at North - South border on Friday: BBC Chinese geologists say N. Korea's main nuclear test site has likely collapsed: WaPo China air force intimidates Taiwan with military flights around island: Reuters Conservative Supreme Court justices appear to back Trump's travel ban: The Hill French president expects Trump will withdraw from Iranian nuclear deal: BBC Rising interest rates keep Wall Street on edge: CBS Investors will focus on various inflation numbers in days ahead: Bloomberg A closer look at the 10 - year Treasury yield's rise to 3 %: Calafia Beach Pundit T. Rowe Price's assets under mgt top $ 1 trillion — a sign of active mgt growth: P&I World trade volume slumped 0.4 % in Feb, first monthly loss since Oct: CPB

The legal basis for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in Justice Douglas classic opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut.5 In the Griswold case, the United States Supreme Court struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraception.

Not one executive of any major Wall Street firm that caused the financial crash in 2008 through fraudulent activities was prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department — which was headed at the time by law partners from Covington & Burling — the Big Tobacco law firm that was singled out in a Federal Court decision for hiding the deadly effects of cigarette smoke for decades.

The announcement came a day after Trump fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates, a holdover from the Obama administration, after she announced she had directed Justice Department attorneys not to defend the president's temporary travel ban on seven majority - Muslim countries in court.

Interestingly, the biggest move here wasn't from customers themselves but from the European Union Court of Justice, which upheld the Right to be Forgotten principle in a May ruling against Google.

WASHINGTON (AP)-- The Supreme Court says Justice Sonia Sotomayor (SOHN» - ya soh - toh - my - YOR») has been released from the hospital following shoulder replacement surgery.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

A spokeswoman declined to answer a series of direct questions from CNBC about his case, instead providing a statement from Acting Assistant Attorney General Caroline D. Ciraolo of the Justice Department's Tax Division: «Bradley Birkenfeld was afforded due process of law and sentenced by a federal district court after full consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, including his admission that he advised wealthy UBS clients on how to conceal their assets from the U.S. government,» she said.

The Law Society of Upper Canada («LSUC») has filed a motion to have the application of law professor Dr. Ryan Alford challenging the new «Statement of Principles» requirement transferred to Divisional Court from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Critics in the U.S. charge that the Department of Justice is able to cook up «secret deals» to extract large fines from major companies for wrongdoing, without ever having to submit its actions to the authority of a court.

Comparable treatment can be found in Europe, where EU member states exempt virtual currencies from taxation as a result of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling on October 22, 2015 stating that the exchange of traditional currency for Bitcoin virtual currency (and vice versa) is exempt from value added tax in the EU.

To try and re-elect an Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice who has proven in the past that he thinks his opinion is above the laws of the state and has already been removed from the office once for his actions is disgraceful.

Attackers gunned down an elderly Christian couple late Sunday inside their Baghdad home, the latest in a string of religious - rooted violence that has spurred international outcry and a full - court press for justice from Iraqi authorities.

Dissenting from the Championruling, Chief Justice Melville Fuller issued a prescient warning that, having adopted the notion that the nation's «fundamental law is flexible,» the court would be met with constant demands to «ease the shoe where it pinches» until nothing resembling the vision of the Constitution remained.

We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.

Regardless of points of view, the Wall Street Journal reports that the Justice Department is already «pursuing court orders to force Apple Inc. to help investigators extract data from iPhones in about a dozen undisclosed cases around the country, in disputes similar to the current battle over a terrorist's locked phone...»

Bob Wilson from the Free Churches group told Premier's News Hour: «There's loads of factors... There are justice factors for example: the policing, the courts, prisons, probation.

Conservatives, angry that the key Supreme Court votes for abortion and gay rights came from Republican - appointed justices, have vowed to ensure that Bush's nominees will be solid conservatives like Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarencejustices, have vowed to ensure that Bush's nominees will be solid conservatives like Justices Antonin Scalia and ClarenceJustices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

The attorney for Saeed Abedini also was kept from appearing in the Iranian court, said the American Center for Law and Justice.

Those words from Hamlet seem appropriate on the death of US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, a man on the opposite side of the political fence from Eisenhower, said much the same thing in a 1952 Supreme Court decision when he wrote, «We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being.

1) The purpose of punishment in secular courts is fourfold: the rehabilitation of the criminal, the protection of society from the criminal, the deterrence of other potential criminals, and retributive justice.

It reminds us that our most pressing constitutional questions (on slavery and secession) were settled out of court; that it took more than a wiser judge to reverse our most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed philosopher - king but a self - taught lawyer from Kentucky by way of Illinois.

David Robertson explains why he believes today's ruling by the European Court of Justice that employers can ban workers from wearing religious... More

That celebration is a bit premature — though as Justice Scalia feared in his dissent from the Court's invalidation of the Defense of Marriage Act's definition of marriage, the second shoe may indeed drop shortly.

Olson also invoked «fundamental rights» and was queried by Justice Scalia as to just exactly when it became unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage: 1791 with the Bill of Rights, 1868 with the 14th Amendment, or some other date, perhaps after the Court declined in 1971 to review a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding opposite - sex marriage requirements?

Our selfish isolationism, our refusal to participate in the effort to build a world order of peace and justice through the League of Nations, our aloofness from the World court, our scuttling of the London Economic Conference, our interference with the free flow of goods by high tariffs, our Oriental Exclusion Act, our arming of Japan for her war upon China, are a few of the counts in the indictment which the God and Father of all mankind must bring against us.

If the argument here is correct, the two developments result from some of the same causes: The American kind of church - state separation meant no church monopolized religious symbols; courts were called upon to articulate ultimate purpose and justice; and judges felt little ambivalence in doing so.

As for the conclusion of Aidan O'Neill QC, that schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who refuse to use stories or textbooks promoting same - sex marriage and that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their children from lessons, does that sound at all unlikely, given the cases of the Strasbourg four, which were considered by the European Court of Justice in September?

In Abuse of Discretion, the latest book lobbed at the unsteady edifice of Roe v. Wade, Clarke D. Forsythe turns to the Supreme Court justices» private notes and memos from 1971 to 1973 in order to «solve the puzzle» of the court's legalization of abortion on deCourt justices» private notes and memos from 1971 to 1973 in order to «solve the puzzle» of the court's legalization of abortion on decourt's legalization of abortion on demand.

«Just as the ruling from the Supreme Court held, access to justice in the United Kingdom must be available and affordable to all.