The Canadians have also had success in obtaining liquid fuels
from the tar sands which accompany the shales.
Not exact matches
Add in stolid First Nations resistance to a proposed pipeline
from the
tar sands to Kitimat, and all these powerful pressures converge on the aptly named Second Narrows,
which already has seen its oil tanker traffic rise precipitously in the past decade.
Refiners don't particularly want
tar sands oil,
which is tougher to make into usable transportation fuel, so it sells for about $ 20 to $ 30 less per barrel than crude
from Texas or the Dakotas.
At the same time, we draw inspiration and lessons
from the victory against Enbridge for the ongoing fight against Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain pipeline expansion,
which would see a sevenfold increase in
tar sands tanker traffic in Burrard Inlet and the Salish Sea.
TransCanada announced on Thursday a two - year delay in the completion of its proposed Energy East pipeline,
which would transport
tar sands oil across Canada
from Alberta to New Brunswick.
House Speaker John Boehner, R - Ohio, appealed to Obama to approve the $ 8 billion project,
which would pipe oil
from the Canadian
tar sands to U.S. refineries on the Gulf Coast.
Regarding Keystone, I myself think it is clear that Obama should say no to Keystone, because it is something in his power to do,
which would have some effect on retarding development of the
tar sands (despite what the flawed State Department EIS [Environmental Impact Statement] said), and because we really wouldn't get any significant benefit
from saying yes; no real oil security, few permanent jobs, and most of the money goes to Canada and to refiners in free - trade zones.
We still don't know enough about
tar sand oil, or bitumen,
which takes longer to break down due to its high viscosity, but doesn't spread, we also don't know much about the behavior of oil
from a blowout, such as the Deepwater Horizon BP blowout, and we know little of how crude oil behaves in the Arctic Ocean, where there is ice, or how to remediate it,» said Michel Boufadel, director of NJIT's Center for Natural Resources Development and Protection and a member of the panel of experts charged with evaluating the impact of spills in Northern waters.
The draft law was kept on ice during trade talks between the European Union and Canada, the world's biggest producer of oil
from tar sands,
which culminated in a multi-million-dollar pact signed earlier this year.
The United States has become deeply reliant on extreme extraction
from Canada's
tar sands,
which this year are expected to become this country's top source of imported crude, surpassing our purchases
from the vast oil fields of Saudi Arabia.
Other key decisions include the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline,
which would pump oil
from Canada's
tar sands to refineries in Texas.
Reject Greenhouse Gas emissions reductions schemes that come
from high - risk technologies
which create irreversible damage to human and planetary health including
tar sands, shale gas, nuclear energy, and geo - engineering;
Gasoline
from traditional sources, including these harebrained schemes to go offshore and onto ANWR, is inseparable
from tar sands and oil shale,
which are far more abundant and destructive (as Raypierre pointed out).
Dubbed by some as the «most destructive project on Earth» - scarring it visibly
from space - there's no doubt that the
tar sands extraction industry has a huge environmental footprint,
which even President Obama could not help but acknowledge during his visit to Ottawa last week, to the chagrin of some Canadian officials.
But on the Keystone XL pipeline —
which, if not blocked by President Obama, would carry the crudest form of oil
from Canadian
tar sand deposits to Gulf Coast fuel refineries — it seems there's little room for varied stances, at least according to some protesters.
The bill,
which was prompted by an application
from Enbridge Oil to pipe oil
from Alberta's
tar sands region to Montreal refineries, and then through Vermont's Northeast Kingdom on its way to Portland, Maine, is now on its way through the Vermont House, where it is expected to be passed with flying colours.
We know
which oil refineries process
tar sands, and ForestEthics has already convinced 19 companies to stop buying
from them.
According to Salon.com,
which obtained over 300 emails of personal messages between lobbyists and Canadian officials, the CEA is part of a sophisticated public affairs strategy designed to manipulate the U.S. political system by deluging the media with messaging favorable to the
tar -
sands industry; to persuade key state and federal legislators to act in the extractive industries» favor; and to defeat any attempt to regulate the carbon emissions emanating
from gasoline and diesel used by U.S. vehicles.
The multi-billion dollar refinery,
which processes
tar sands imported
from Alberta, Canada, into crude oil, is located in Southwest Detroit bordering the neighboring communities of River Rouge, and Melvindale.
The National Transportation Safety Board released its findings
from a two year investigation of the 2010 Enbridge
tar sands crude pipeline spill (
which DeSmogBlog has covered in depth) that dumped over a million gallons of toxic diluted bitumen (or DilBit) into the Kalamazoo River and its watershed.
This briefing finds that the transport of
tar sands oil through pipelines in the United States is exempt
from payments into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund,
which creates a free ride worth over $ 375 million to
tar sands oil producers between 2010 and 2017.
Organizers are concerned about Canada's relentless lobbying against a key piece of EU climate policy, the Fuel Quality Directive,
which aims to reduce imports of highly polluting fuels such as
tar sands and synthetic oil
from coal into Europe.
The proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline,
which would transport the
tar sands oil to Canada's west coast, would likely face opposition
from environmentalists in Canada in addition to possible legal challenges
from more than 100 First Nations in Western Canada.
Fracking has expanded to the majority of the Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara nations, (Ft. Berthold) and a new pipeline for the Bakken fracked oil is proposed to go
from North Dakota into Minnesota, adjacent to the Enbridge pipeline
which is seeking expansion
from 440,000 barrels to 800,000 barrels per day of dilbit, or
tar sands oil.
That last one's particularly important, as the Obama administration is still considering the approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline,
which will run
from the
tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to the Texas Gulf Coast.
On the contrary, Figure 1 is a conservative estimate of potential emissions
from tar sands because: the economically extractable amount grows with technology development and oil price; the total
tar sands resource is larger than the known resource, possibly much larger; extraction of
tar sands oil uses conventional oil and gas,
which will show up as additions to the purple bars in Figure 1; development of
tar sands will destroy overlying forest and prairie ecology, emitting biospheric CO2 to the atmosphere.
The spill,
which leaked heavy, viscous
tar sands oil, emanates
from the Pegasus Pipeline,
which was built in the 1940's.
The project is the Northern Gateway pipeline that would bring oil
from the
tar sands of Alberta to a proposed tanker terminal at the coast - an initiative supported by China,
which could end up the main beneficiary of the oil.
We have two main concerns: the risk of oil spills along the pipeline,
which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, and the fact that the extraction of petroleum
from the
tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions than conventional production does.
«Unconventional» is almost a code - word for dirty... such as the Canadian
tar sands — as you saw the 60 Minutes special —
which increase the total greenhouse gas emissions
from gasoline substantially.
Suncor,
which leaked 350,000 litres of toxic
tar sands wastewater into the Athabasca River for 10 hours last month (for the second time in two years, it turns out), also spilled 225 barrels of soybean - based diesel fuel into Burrard Inlet
from its Port Moody, BC facility, but didn't bother to tell anyone about it.
Another Scandinavian country is also cutting ties to coal as six Danish pension funds —
which combined manage $ 36.3 billion in assets — decided in April to divest
from coal,
tar sands and deepwater and Arctic oil exploration.
The communities along this corridor have long faced health impacts and pollution
from these refineries, and the pollution is only getting worse as the refineries accept and process
tar sands crude,
which exposes residents to even greater levels of toxic chemicals, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, lead, carbon dioxide, and other harmful pollutants.
As to the controversial Keystone Pipeline,
which would carry
tar sands oil
from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast, Obama said that the pipeline would not be approved if it worsens climate change: «our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution.»
No matter the new pipeline capacity added, or the
tar sands projects cancelled, every June since 2012 CAPP has warned that
tar sands producers are about to run out of pipeline capacity — as you can see
from the graphs CAPP publishes,
which look the same every year, only adjusting the base year.
Victories were seen on four continents: in Bolivia a draconian response to protestors embarrassed the government, causing them to drop plans to build a road through Tipnis, an indigenous Amazonian reserve; in Myanmar, a nation not known for bowing to public demands, large protests pushed the government to cancel a massive Chinese hydroelectric project; in Borneo a three - year struggle to stop the construction of a coal plant on the coast of the Coral Triangle ended in victory for activists; in Britain plans to privatize forests created such a public outcry that the government not only pulled back but also apologized; and in the U.S. civil disobedience and massive marches pressured the Obama Administration to delay a decision on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline,
which would bring
tar sands from Canada to a global market.
«This letter puts the biggest corporate consumers of oil on notice that there's no excuse not to invest in cleaner, more efficient fleets, and that it's simply wrong to source oil
from the
tar sands,
which is fouling the land and water in communities across the country,
from Maine to Kalamazoo to Utah.»
In Calgary, the Joint Review Panel today (December 19) recommended that the federal government approve the $ 6.5 - billion project,
which would transport oil
from the Alberta
tar sands across British Columbia to Asia, subject to 209 conditions.
Bitumen, or asphalt, is the feedstock
which tar sands and oil
sands producers remove
from the ground, thick enough to require mining, not pumping.
For example, Froman apparently has already been successful in challenging an EU fuel quality directive that would limit shipments to Europe of dirty
tar sands oil, including that
which would flow through pipelines like the proposed Keystone XL system for export
from U.S. ports.
Such fires across the northern U.S. and Canada —
which last month forced the evacuation of 80,000
from the Alberta
tar sands town of Fort McMurray — were projected to increase over the coming decades as the climate continues to warm.
The Desmarais family and their Belgian partner, Albert Frere, are the largest shareholders in oil company Total,
which hopes to take three billion barrels of oil
from the Alberta
tar sands over the next 30 years.
The objections to Keystone XL stem at least in part
from widespread concern over the production of oil
from tar sands,
which ravages the landscape, pollutes rivers and emits high concentrations of greenhouse gases.
The wind might finally be at the back of the landowners and environmentalists who for years have warned that the pipeline,
which will carry bitumen
from Canada's carbon bomb known as the
tar sands, is a threat to fresh water supplies and the climate.
Another critic argues that the studies fail to consider no - till cultivation of biofuel crops,
which actually increase soil carbon storage, and that corn ethanol plants are converting to renewable energy, thus decreasing their emissions - meanwhile they are competing against fossil fuels like oil
from tar sands that have an increased carbon footprint even compared to conventional gasoline.
The incident is refueling calls for the Obama administration to reject the controversial Keystone XL pipeline,
which would deliver
tar sands oil
from Canada to refineries in Texas.
Hansen was taking part in a civil disobedience action at the White House organized to halt the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline,
which will bring dirty oil
from the Canadian
tar sands down to US refineries in the Gulf.
Today, President Obama is expected to veto a bill authorizing the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline,
which would transport crude oil
from Canada's
tar sands through the United States to oil refineries on the Gulf Coast.
The government and Enbridge Inc. are stepping up their game to push through what is largely seen as an alternative to Keystone XL: the Northern Gateway pipeline project,
which would carry oil
from the Alberta
tar sands to the Canadian west coast for export to China.
This Monday, White House spokesperson Josh Earnest said that President Obama would make a finial decision before the end of his term on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline,
which would transport oil
from Canada's
tar sands into the U.S. and beyond if approved.