The U.S. economy faces significant risks
from unabated climate change.
Not exact matches
The U.N. report gets two things right: 1) there is a risk of serious damages
from climate change if left
unabated for a century and 2) poor countries in the low latitudes are likely to bear the greatest share of that risk.
As the tit - for - tat attacks
from the tail ends of the spectrum on
climate change continue
unabated, what was once presumed influence on the part of these scientists will likely become real influence on public opinion and political decision - making, and these scientists will be partly responsible.
Worldwide,
from 1980 to 2009, floods caused more than 500,000 deaths and affected more than 2.8 billion people.18 In the United States, floods caused 4,586 deaths
from 1959 to 200519 while property and crop damage averaged nearly 8 billion dollars per year (in 2011 dollars) over 1981 through 2011.17 The risks
from future floods are significant, given expanded development in coastal areas and floodplains,
unabated urbanization, land - use
changes, and human - induced
climate change.18
In the absence of a regulatory framework and global standards of conservation tied to
climate change value of blue carbon, will allow the gap to continue with
unabated transformation, conversion and release of carbon
from blue carbon zones.
from Mann et al: Esoteric and academic arguments about the response of the atmosphere to a doubling of CO2 may be interesting for those steeped in the peer - reviewed literature, but for the public and policy makers the important and unfortunate fact is that
climate change is continuing
unabated.
In addition to concealing the known risks, Exxon and Suncor... directed, participated in, and benefited
from efforts to misleadingly cast doubt about the causes and consequences of
climate change, including: (1) making affirmative and misleading statements suggesting that continued and
unabated fossil fuel use was safe (in spite of internal knowledge to the contrary); and (2) attacking
climate science and scientists that tried to report truthfully about the dangers of
climate change.
The plaintiffs also employ wild leaps of logic divorced
from reality: «By hiding what they knew about, and affirmatively misrepresenting the dangers of
unabated fossil fuel use, the Defendants protected fossil fuel demand, and obstructed the
changes needed to prevent or at least minimize the impacts of
climate change.»
Additionally, the researchers» detailed field data make clear that the land sinking around Washington is not primarily driven by human influence, such as groundwater withdrawals, but instead is a long - term geological process that will continue
unabated for tens of thousands of years, independent
from human land use or
climate change.
[10] While many companies appear to believe that
climate targets will not be met, we are unaware of any company (save Statoil) that endeavors to incorporate the physical and economic impacts of largely
unabated climate change on the macroeconomic forecasts that drive their modeling, though that flows, ipso facto,
from the suggestion that the world is likely to use far more fossil fuels than could safely be combusted whilst still achieving those targets.