Sentences with phrase «from under the loan»

It's like you can't ever get out from under these loans no matter how much you pay extra... its so frustrating I've paid $ 21.6 k toward my loans for the balance to be $ 9k lower than I started.

Not exact matches

For example, if you buy a piece of machinery with a loan that was intended to fill a short - term need like employee payroll, then you risk being saddled with a loan that you can't get out from under.

Jamie Byron, co-founder of 30 Under 30 honoree Grove, says the personal fulfillment from starting his own company after graduating from MIT in 2013 has been worth any amount of student - loan debt.

Under the standard 10 - year repayment plan, the grace period raises the monthly payment from $ 380 to $ 388, and the total cost of the loan by $ 981.

Under the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, borrowers are exempt from taxes on forgiven mortgage debt (short sales, foreclosures or loan modifications) up to $ 2 million on a primary residence.

This news comes against a backdrop, where small business owners are, generally speaking, finding it harder to get loans under $ 1 million from banks — and more specifically to find loans of less than $ 50,000.

In each of the last three years under Mills, the SBA backed about $ 30 billion in loans, up from $ 17.8 billion in 2009.

If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset - Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the lesser of (a) the commitment amount and (b) the borrowing base (including as a result of reductions to the borrowing base that would result from certain non-ordinary course sales of inventory with a value in excess of $ 25 million, if applicable), NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the commitment amount.

The amendment provided for (i) an immediate reduction in the interest rate margin applicable to the loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from (a) 3.50 % to 3.00 % for LIBOR borrowings and (b) 2.50 % to 2.00 % for base rate borrowings, (ii) an immediate lowering of the LIBOR floor for loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from 1.25 % to 1.00 % and (iii) the borrowing of incremental term loans, the proceeds of which were used to repay the outstanding loans of lenders that did not consent to the repricing amendment (the Non-Consenting Lenders) in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 99.6 million, which is the amount of loans held by such Non-Consenting Lenders on February 8, 2013.

If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset - Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the lesser of (a) the commitment amount and (b) the borrowing base (including as a result of reductions to the borrowing base that would result from certain non-ordinary course sales of inventory with a value in excess of $ 25 million, if applicable), we will be required to repay outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the commitment amount.

In that case, if he can deliver the shares to the lender when prices have fallen, and retain no other contractual obligation (either because it is a non-recourse loan, or because he has no other attachable wealth), he has in effect a put option from the lender that substantially matches the put option he has transferred to employees who buy shares under the program.

Loans under the new credit facility bear interest, at our option, at (i) a base rate based on the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50 % and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one - month interest period in each case plus a margin ranging from 0.00 % to 1.00 %, or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00 % to 2.00 %.

Loans under the new credit facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at (i) a base rate based on the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50 % and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one - month interest period in each case plus a margin ranging from 0.00 % to 1.00 %, or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00 % to 2.00 %.

Loans under the credit facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at (i) a base rate based on the highest of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50 % and an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one - month interest period plus 1.00 %, in each case plus a margin ranging from 0.00 % to 0.75 % or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00 % to 1.75 %.

Borrowings under our credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate equal to, at our option, either (a) for LIBOR loans, LIBOR (but not less than 1.0 %) or (b) for ABR loans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans, LIBOR (but not less than 1.0 %) or (b) for ABR loans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeLoans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offering.

• 1/2 of self - employment tax (self - employed individuals are required to pay «payroll» taxes that an employer would otherwise take; these extra taxes can be deducted from AGI, but are included in MAGI) • Student loan interest • Tuition and fees deduction • Qualified tuition expenses • Passive income or loss • Rental losses • IRA contributions and taxable Social Security payments • Exclusion for income from U.S. savings bonds • Exclusion for adoption expenses (under 137)

FedLoan Servicing services FFELP loans that were sold and transferred as a result of legislation known as the Enduring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (ECASLA), under which the U.S. Department of Education offered to purchase FFELP loans from third - party lenloans that were sold and transferred as a result of legislation known as the Enduring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (ECASLA), under which the U.S. Department of Education offered to purchase FFELP loans from third - party lenLoans Act (ECASLA), under which the U.S. Department of Education offered to purchase FFELP loans from third - party lenloans from third - party lenders.

The loan can not be from a relative or made under a qualified employer plan, and the student must be a taxpayer, a spouse, or a dependent; only those enrolled at least half - time in a degree program qualify.

In June, a notice from the Ontario Securities Commission cautioned peer - to - peer lenders that a loan arrangement entered into on their websites «may» constitute a security under provincial regulations, which reinforced the view of players such as Grouplend and Borrowell that they should be sticking with wealthy «prospectus exempt» investors to be on the safe side.

Although made under the Direct Loan Program, Direct PLUS Loans for parents must be consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan in order to benefit from PSLF.

While student loan borrowers may think bankruptcy is an answer to getting out from under the weight of federal or private student loans, rarely is bankruptcy an option to discharge student loan balances.

Borrowings under our credit facility bear interest at a per annum rate equal to, at our option, either (a) for LIBOR loans, LIBOR (but not less than 1.0 % for the term loan only) or (b) for ABR loans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans, LIBOR (but not less than 1.0 % for the term loan only) or (b) for ABR loans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans, the highest of (i) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5 %, (ii) the prime rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.0 %, plus a margin ranging from 3.25 % to 3.75 % for LIBOR loans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeloans and 2.25 % to 2.75 % for ABR Loans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offeLoans, depending on our leverage ratio and on certain factors relating to this offering.

Under the Ability - to - Repay rule announced today, all new mortgages must comply with basic requirements that protect consumers from taking on loans they don't have the financial means to pay back.

The worst companies don't receive enough votes to stay in business, and they ultimately go under (but not before getting a $ 536 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy).

Banks everywhere must take loan provisions upfront from 2018 under new IFRS 9 rules.

Assets under management in loan funds grew to more than $ 156 billion as of the end of 2017, up from $ 110 billion in 2016.

Instead, your payment will be the amount necessary to repay your loan in full by the earlier of (a) 10 years from the date you begin repaying under the alternative repayment plan, or (b) the ending date of your 20 - or 25 - year REPAYE Plan repayment period.

B&G Foods completed the refinancing of its senior secured credit facility, increasing the principal amount of the tranche B term loans by $ 10 million to approximately $ 650 million and the aggregate commitments under its revolving credit facility from $ 500 million to $ 700 million.

The loan can not be from a related person or made under a qualified employer plan.

· Prevent inverted companies from accessing a foreign subsidiary's earnings while deferring U.S. tax through the use of creative loans, which are known as «hopscotch» loans (Action under section 956 (e) of the code)

«Last month, LCD, a unit within S&P Global Market Intelligence, said that assets under management in loan funds had grown to more than $ 156 billion, up from around $ 110 billion two years ago... The big, potentially market - destabilizing problem hidden in bond funds has to do with liquidity.

Student loan servicers have been under fire in recent years, facing lawsuits from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and various state attorneys general.

According to the myth, he'll be lucky if he can dig himself out from under his student loan debt one day and afford an apartment that isn't populated with stoner roommates and cockroaches.

The bill applies only to colleges that receive state funding — but that includes state grants and loans to students, most importantly under the «Cal Grant» program that assists academically promising students from modest - income families.

Furthermore, under the general welfare provision of the Constitution, the Federal Government offers financial assistance to states and local communities for a variety of educational purposes, ranging from subsidies for school lunch programs to salaries for teachers of agriculture and loans for school building construction.

This is according to the Daily Star, who are reporting that Conte's decision to send the 24 - year - old out on loan has come under scrutiny from the player himself, who is currently in fine form for Borussia Dortmund over in the Germany.

Because the loan was made from a company to an individual, the transaction doesn't fall under the «gifting» rules.

American fans might get a glimpse of USMNT Under - 20 star Cameron Carter - Vickers, who is on loan with the Blades from Tottenham Hotspur.

He was snapped up by Arsenal in 2009, but despite some encouraging early months at the club, he faded from the picture under Wenger, and eventually returned to Zenit — first on loan in 2012, and then permanently a year later.

It was not all bad news for the Arsenal players on international duty last night, as our young defender Calum Chambers, who has gone to Middlesborough on loan, started and completed the match for Gareth Southgate's England under 21s in which they hammered Norway by 6 - 1, three of them coming from Man United's Marcus Rashford.

Arsene under pressure from poor performances has stunted the growth of a lot of potential Arsenal developed players lately...... the loans don't necessarily build confidence.......

It may be that, for some of them, a loan move away from Old Trafford would afford an opportunity to play regular first - team football and establish themselves as top - level performers before returning to Manchester to stake a claim for a consistent starting berth under van Gaal.

Arsenal have written off Gnabry from the rank and file of their squad as a reliable Gunner they can reckon with after his failed loan outings at WBA and his unimpressive performances latter for our Under 21 team.

His previous Indy car career was short but prolific, winning 11 times in 21 starts, capturing the 1999 CART Championship while under loan from Williams.

Arsenal fans were sad to see Vermaelen leave, but a potential loan deal in January would make sense for both parties; Vermaelen would be able to get much - needed game time under his belt when he returns from injury, while Arsenal would greatly benefit from having a good quality defender who can lead from example and knows what it takes to play in the Premier League.

The former Ajax central defender joined the Saints on a season - long loan deal from La Liga giants Atletico Madrid last summer and went on to make 26 league appearances under manager Ronald Koeman.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The Belgian international is currently spending the season on loan at St Mary's from La Liga champions Atletico Madrid, and has been impressive under the stewardship of Ronald Koeman so far.

IMO it was the bad loan we got him and playing under Pullis is what drove him away from us, if we rated him so highly then why loan him to Pullis?

Here is my list of players from the 29 that can be sold released or loan, which will bring the over 21 year old first team squad down to just 21 players Szczesney Martinez Macey Debuchy Flamini Arteta Rosicky Sanogo This then gives us space for 4 new signings, personally I think that would be enough if we go with this squad for next season Cech ospina Huddart (under 21) Jenkinson Bellerin (u21) New signining, Mertesacker Koscielny Gabriel Monreal Gibbs New signing Coquelin chambers (u21) Elneny wilshire ramsey New Signing, walcott, chamberlain Ozil, iwobi (u21) toral (u21) Alexis, Campbell, Wellington New signing, Welbeck, giroud