Sentences with phrase «from valid evidence»

Not exact matches

From Answers in Genesis:» ■ By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

When presented with the statement of account which is already in evidence as ASO 14 (1 - 19) to confirm transaction of December 17, 2014, Ekuwem said that, «there was a valid inflow into their account on the date, which was narrated as transfer in favour of Teledon International Limited from One Plus Holdings Limited».

The FDA's demand for scientific evidence from clinical trials «is a valid position.

And there is considerable work still to be done in spreading evidence - based programs: Only 3 percent of children with problems ranging from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to disruptive behavior to suicidality receive evidence - based services, he said, partly because scientifically valid programs often have a high price tag.

However, when 50 children were evaluated with the Autism Diagnostic Interview — Revised 35 and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule — Generic, 36 94 % met criteria for ASD on both instruments, and 100 % met criteria on at least 1 instrument.37 Record - review validation studies conducted by the investigators demonstrate that the predictors of valid ASD diagnoses were having more than 2 diagnoses in the medical record.38 Most influenza infections in our study were determined from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes rather than serologic evidence.

It is the very beginning of a possible story, opening opportunities for students to make valid predictions, based on evidence from the text or to continue the story by keeping the theme alive throughout.

CORE selected its measures of social - emotional learning based on evidence from other settings that they were valid predictors of academic success.

Validity, or rather evidencing that something from which inferences are drawn is in fact valid, is MUCH more complicated than simply running these types of correlations.

It is important to note, however, that even if the conclusions from these studies are right, they provide evidence about whether value - added measures are valid on the average across large numbers of teachers.

Indisputable evidence from the frontlines of teaching took center stage today at a CEA news conference in Hartford as teachers urged lawmakers to examine the needs of students and reject a test that is not valid, reliable, or fair.

i. Assurance of the technical quality of assessment used for state reporting so that the evidence of learning derived from the classroom, school or district performance assessments is accurate, valid and reliable for the purposes for which it will be used; ii.

Vermont's state board also resolved that until Vermont has more experience with evidence from the SBACs, «the results of the SBAC assessment will not support reliable and valid inferences about student performance, and thus should not be used as the basis for any consequential purpose.»

Anecdotal evidence is just as valid as data generated from research studies.

Their research explored whether there was evidence of this kind of bias by conducting what researchers call a «sensitivity analysis» to test whether the results from the L.A. Times model were valid and reliable.

(iii) If a negative test result is required and the medical explanation concerns a situation in which the employee has a permanent or long - term medical condition that precludes him or her from providing a valid specimen, as the MRO, you must follow the procedures outlined at § 40.160 for determining if there is clinical evidence that the individual is an illicit drug user.

Your statements and opinions must be backed up by valid scientific evidence and data from recognized field experts, and your conclusions must point to additional work that might be warranted or new questions and issues that may arise as technology does.

Once again, the authors are applying methods developed by others in ways different from their original intent without acknowledging as much, and without providing evidence that such an application is valid.

Any pet store that sells dogs must provide purchasers of dogs with the following information at the time of sale: • A certificate of medical health completed by a veterinarian stating that the dog has been examined and there is no evidence of disease, illness, or injury at the time of the examination; • The name, complete address, and telephone number of the breeder that bred the dog, the regulated dog breeding kennel where the dog was kept, housed, and maintained, and the regulated dog intermediary from whom the pet store acquired the dog, as applicable; and • A money - back guarantee that is valid for up to 21 days after the date of purchase of the dog.

Given the evidence that words may be relatively worthless in propelling change on energy and climate, other kinds of communication, from cartoons to folk songs to YouTube videos on geo - engineering, have as valid a place in the discourse as articles or, yes, blogs.

It appears from your uninformative reason why my comment didn't «comport» to your very dodgy Comments Policy, that in your mind, when you say; «a paper from years ago», that you are now saying that valid scientific evidence backed up by the Earth Sciences department at Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, The American Geophysical Union & Harvard University has a shelf life and if it exceeds a certain time frame it is deemed invalid.

Based on the evidence as it currently exists, it just is not a valid scientific position to assert with certainty that human emissions have caused recent changes to the climate, and therefore the policy implications that stem from that.

Although his comment suggested such, I doubt that he really believes that individual commenters here were responding because something had been «deemed urgent» by some unspecified «deemers,» and, (2) it seems to me that you might be drawing conclusions from Lewandowsky's research that (assuming you find his research methodology to be valid — which some seem to question) are not supported by the evidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raquevidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist&raquEvidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist» side.

It is about study and evaluation of evidence, or lack thereof, and if it is evidence the skeptic seeks to find valid testing that theory was derived from.

Bottom line: from this analysis, there's no valid evidence that the warming rate (the trend, not the fluctuations) has changed at all.

The measurements taken in the 1800's were acceptable but not as reliable and valid as the wiki article potrays, as evidenced by the still significantly off measurements and predictions made in the 1950's, although these facts do not undo past measurements completely, I take issue with the brief and under stated remarks about the 1800's and shying away from calibration issues.

If so, the decision is valid because there is no miscarriage of justice; because it is the decision that ought to have been made on the valid findings of facts; because appeals are from the evidence not from the reasons.

(i) Whether the applicant has provided evidence sufficient to raise a valid, bona fide or reasonable claim; (ii) Whether the applicant has established a relationship with the third party from whom the information is sought such that it establishes that the third party is somehow involved in the acts complained of; (iii) Whether the third party is the only practicable source of the information available; (iv) Whether the third party can be indemnified for costs to which the third party may be exposed because of the disclosure, some [authorities] refer to the associated expenses of complying with the orders, while others speak of damages; and (v) Whether the interests of justice favour the obtaining of disclosure.

Due to the risk of missing out on valid clicks, blocking IP addresses from your Adwords account should be done as a last resort when you have compelling evidence that you're receiving invalid clicks.

To our knowledge, there is no evidence to suggest that self - report measures of CU traits are less valid than parent - report or teacher - report measures, although we acknowledge that collecting data from multiple informants would have strengthened the study.